The Matchmaker by Stella Gibbons

The Matchmaker by Stella Gibbons

published 1949 or 1950



“Oh, I suddenly couldn’t bear [the furniture] another minute, so I moved it into the woodshed,” said Alda cheerfully.

“Into the woodshed? …Quite nice pieces, as I remember them,” said Mr. Waite, reprovingly.

“Oh no, definitely nasty,” said Alda, who was beginning to feel slightly hysterical.

“‘Something nasty in the woodshed,’” said Jean. “Alda darling, shall I go and make the tea? The children will be in any minute.”

 

Well, get you. Stella Gibbons the one person entitled to make this joke. (for those not in the know: the phrase something nasty in the woodshed originates in her earlier book Cold Comfort Farm, and became common currency)

Later someone does the washing up ‘vigorously yet carefully… with a little mop’ – clettering the dishes! Though sadly this turns into a ‘miserable little dishcloth’ a few pages later.

This book came up in the comments when we were discussing poultry farming – a miserable way to lose all your money, much featured in the fiction and lives of the 1930s. So then I found this excellent Punch cartoon, for another mention.


I did not like The Matchmaker very much, but somehow am finding a lot to say about it – there is an earlier post here:

A Matchmaking Christmas

--I think I just kept finding good illos.

The plot: Alda is the heroine, mother of three girls, husband still away most of the time, house bombed. She moves into a fairly horrible cottage in the country while she waits for new accommodation and to get her husband back.

An old friend, Jean, comes to stay with them, helping out practically and financially. Alda determines that Jean – unlucky in love – must find a husband. Meanwhile, at the nearby farm there are two Italian POWs coming every day to work, and then a landgirl, Sylvia.

She is the focus of much of Gibbons’ apparent dislike. As I said recently about a quite different book,

she appears to create a lot of characters whom she actively dislikes, pouring scorn on their clothes, décor, weight, life choices. Is it naïve to say it seems slightly unfair to give people these attributes and then lay into them for exactly those features?… but this is widespread among many people writing about British provincial life.

It happens a lot, and it annoys me. Martin Amis (in a wider discussion) talks about authors putting a ‘thumb on the scales’, ie pushing readers into opinions on the characters the author has created, and that’s a good description.

Alda strikes the modern reader as complacent, stupid, unthinking and rather ridiculous. Very occasionally the author gently mocks her, but I think it’s clear that she is the wise woman Mary Sue – even though her attempts at matchmaking are about as successful as those of JaneAusten’s Emma (and if Emma annoys you, as some of my readers revealed, then I wouldn’t try this book). In the comments mentioned above, and in other reviews, there is a common reaction of people wanting to slap her, and that seems about right.

Another trope that annoys me is feisty quirky character who are very critical of other people as being ill-mannered, difficult or boring, while sounding exactly like that themselves. (Mary Wesley was the queen of this feature. Christianna Brand does it all the time but somehow gets away with it)

This is typical:

Alda slightly despised her, of course, for her lack of education and her wrong values…

Education has got Alda nowhere, and her values are not admirable.

So – anything good? I believe the country and weather descriptions are well-written  for people who like that kind of thing. The description of harvesting took me back to a childhood family memory, I even realized via the book how little help we children actually must have been with the stooking, which was an entertaining revelation all these years later. I think we were convinced we were vital to the production.



The odd funny moment: “….of course, I’m a Communist——” Here Mr. Waite gave a sardonic nod. I knew it, said the nod; I was expecting it. Necromancy and the Black Mass to follow.

Occasional scenes overcame her prejudices, and that’s the best I can say.

Sylvia the landgirl, reminiscing about VE night in fact, says

I had an awful old Lana Turner, too, miles too tight it was, it looked simply awful, so I pinched one of the boys’ coats…

-I am going to tentatively suggest that she means a sweater? That is the garment Lana Turner is most famous for (‘The Sweater Girl’) and I can’t find any slang reference to any other clothes associated with her name.




I like to notice items to show attitudes to children don’t change:

“Children aren’t brought up nowadays to be respectful to grown-ups. It’s an old-fashioned idea, and so long as they aren’t rude it doesn’t matter.”

The book that provoked all this – Ember Lane – is forgotten now, but I would say was a better book. I would never want to read The Matchmaker again, that’s for sure. It is snobbish, racist, & the Italians talk in a ludicrous way in English

“Yes. Good-a. You-a bambina?”

And a parallel ludicrous way when they are said to be talking in Italian:

“thou canst imagine!... Thou knowest!

Top picture shows Italian POWs working the land, IWM, an oil painting by Michael Ford

Gorgeous harvest photo from the Imperial War Museum, taken during WW2 by Wildman Shaw –colour photos still not common then. And the harvest scenes in the book is notable for being full of people.


Comments

  1. Yes, that is a good description by Martin Amis. I agree and I think novelists should not do it. It is mean-spirited. Your comment that the country and weather description are well-written for people who like that kind of thing brought to mind Miss Jean Brodie ... No need to read this now, as you have picked out the best bits. I do like her better for the sly references to Cold Comfort Farm, which I imagine was something she never better. Chrissie

    ReplyDelete
  2. I mean 'bettered'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes CCF is a classic in the way her other books aren't - and the others are so different.
      I have come across a lovely description of the way Trollope was the opposite of that mean-spiritedness- he thought it was important to see that even very good people have faults, and very bad people have good points. He demonstrates that so well in his books, and it is what is missing in some others...

      Delete
    2. So much agree! That is one of the reasons I love him. Chrissie

      Delete
  3. The Punch cartoon is perfect!

    I, and my mother before me, have happy memories of haymaking time in our childhoods – the cut grass had to be turned and shaken regularly to help it dry, and the most labour-saving way to do that was to encourage all the village children into the hayfields to kick it about and throw it at each other. So we were genuinely helping whilst playing! Not sure how we’d have got on with stooking though. I suspect these days there is a lot less playing in hayfields and a lot more silage.

    You must be right about the Lana Turner – I always think of the Sweater Girl image as a 1950s thing but Wikipedia says she got the nickname from her appearance in a very tight sweater in a 1937 film, “They Won’t Forget”.

    I’d forgotten the dreadful dialogue of the Italian POWs …

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was so happy to find that cartoon! It could've been made for our discussion.
      I'm glad you were a help with harvest! I must ask my siblings if their memories match mine.

      Delete
    2. My husband swears that his family started him "walking beans" when he was two (weeding soybean rows). He was expected to be able to complete two rows a day by the time he was five.

      Delete
    3. In the past I imagine most of us would have had to be good at stooking, or weeding, from an early age, though the classic first paid jobs for British country children of around five (in the days before compulsory education) were picking stones out of the fields after ploughing and then throwing them at birds to scare them away from the seeds after sowing.

      Sovay

      Delete
    4. Very impressed (if that's the word) by your husband Shay. Terrifying
      And yes Sovay certainly in rural families the children were expected to pitch in from an early age. Stooking did require some upper body strangth though, even Shay's husband probably couldn't have done that at age 2 😀

      Delete
    5. My father in law did not own his land - he worked it on shares as a tenant farmer. All of the family were, as you mentioned, expected to pitch in while still very young and it was a hard life (which may explain why three of the boys ran off and joined the Marines after they finished school).

      Delete
    6. Yes - a hard life, and very similar in Ireland. Sweeping generalisation - men who emigrated (because the family farm couldn't support all the sons) all talked dreamliy and sentimentally about the farm and the beauty and the un-city-ness of it. But they would never in a million years have gone back to it.

      Delete
  4. I don't know if education not doing someone any good was a real consideration back then (and even now). It seemed to me that the important thing was the simple fact of having the education, which other people couldn't get because of money or class differences. Especially for women, who were expected to get married anyway! I don't think a lot of women in Alda's class shared Dorothy Sayers' feelings about scholarship, and quite possibly not many men did, either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All the more reason for Alda not to despise others.
      In many upmarket families, girls' education was seen as pointless, and attention and money lavished on schools for sons not daughters.

      Delete
    2. It wasn't only upper-class women who were regarded as damaged by education:
      "the spirit of Antichrist is abroad:—the people read!—nay, they think!! The people read and think!!! The public, the public in general, the swinish multitude, the many-headed monster, actually reads and thinks!!!! Horrible in thought, but in fact most horrible! Science classifies flowers. Can it make them bloom where it has placed them in its classification! No. Therefore flowers ought not to be classified. This is transcendental logic. Ha! in that cylindrical mirror I see three shadowy forms:—dimly I see them through the smoked glass of my spectacles. Who art thou?—Mystery!—I hail thee! Who art thou?—Jargon—I love thee! Who art thou?—Superstition!—I worship thee! Hail, transcendental TRIAD!"
      - Peacock in Melincourt, satirising (and quoting) Coleridge

      -Roger

      Delete
    3. Thanks! Another post you needn't have signed. Peacock a sure sign its you.

      Delete
  5. I’m with you all the way on this one. The Bairamians in The Bachelor speak in that peculiar, patronising, fake archaic, fake formal way, which is intensely annoying. But fortunately this only really happens at the beginning and end. The rest of the book is very enjoyable (unlike tThe Matchmaker). I’ve come to the conclusion Stella Gibbons is like the little girl who had a little curl right in the middle of her forehead - when she is good, she’s very, very good, but when she is bad she is horrid!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Christine Harding21 January 2026 at 12:05

      That was me

      Delete
    2. Yes, that is what she is like! It is strange though.

      Delete
    3. I missed those bits in the Bachelor - I knew what they'd be like. Loved the book. (Lucy)

      Delete
    4. It's funny because I loved the Bahelor (with a few small reservations) and this book could seem very similar, but had a quite different effect on me

      Delete
  6. "Alda slightly despised her, of course, for her lack of education and her wrong values…"
    Er, isn't the "of course" an ironic instance of the "thumb in the balance" here? It's too crude to be sincere, surely.

    -Roger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But I think there's another layer: Gibbons pretends to take a cool view of Alda but actually doesn't. And honestly, the whole book is full of her unchallenged disdain for others.

      Delete
    2. I find that Caroline Graham is very harsh toward many of the characters in her mystery novels, mocking personal appearance and character traits. This includes Sgt. Troy, and Inspector Barnaby to a lesser extent. However, she treats Barnaby’s daughter, Cully, very sweetly, which is perhaps why I don’t like Cully.
      Nerys

      Delete
    3. Yes, I agree, one of the reasons I don't love those books. She's done well out of them!

      Delete
  7. Is Mr Waite the chicken farmer? What does he think Necromancy and the Black Mass have to do with Communism???

    In the hope of distracting myself from the ever more alarming international situation I have sent for a copy of "Ember Lane" (may have to skip Jess’s chapters for now) and a job lot of O Douglas …

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sovay: (I can't ge this to feature as a reply). I don't think we expect Mr Waite to make sense. He has strong opinions on many things.
    That's exactly why I embarked on O Douglas.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought the inability to Reply was just me, but it looks like Blogger is having an issue. Based on today's headlines I think I'm going to have to supplement O Douglas with at least half a dozen more crime-solving cats.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
  10. My 2 cents - Alda is horrible, like the soul of kindness in Elizabeth Taylor's book of that name. So are her children, apart from Meg. "Stop saying you were 'thrown' off the horse!" Mr Waite is OK, though a theosophist. And what about Stella/Alda's contempt of the farmer's wife? So glad Jean sees sense, tho we get a fascinating glimpse into her fiancé's world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes to all. I can't remember reading many books that I disliked as roundly (when it's an author I usually like and not someone intrinsically hateable!)

      Delete
  11. Oh, and the sentimental patronisation of the Italians is nauseating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment