How to be a Heroine: the works of O Douglas

The Setons  

published 1917

Pink Sugar 

published 1924

both by O Douglas/ Anna Buchan

 



Blogfriend Shay FORCED me to read these books – see this post – and I may not have read everything Douglas wrote, but I have tackled all the ones found in a most unwieldy collection on Kindle, including a memoir of her life. (I had already read Penny Plain, on the blog here). O Douglas was the penname of Anna Buchan: she was the sister of John Buchan, author of Thirty Nine Steps and also the Governor General of Canada (if only that was an ambiguous sentence – in the 1930s it has to have been John with the important job).

She wrote best-selling books in her day – I think now less well-known than her brother, but perhaps I’m wrong. She had a happy and satisfying life, travelled a lot, was very close to her mother (as so many of her heroines are), never married or had children, but was deeply involved in the lives, and offspring, of the friends and family around her. All this seems reflected in her books, which are largely set in the borders area of Scotland.

The works varied a lot in how readable I found them, but most of them had some points of interest, so I will speed through brief descriptions of those I liked…

 

The Setons – is about a family in Glasgow: the widowed father is the minister, his daughter Elizabeth is the heroine. She is bringing up her much younger brother. (this is a common theme in the books: a young boy who is semi-adopted by a single woman). Douglas says, and you would believe her, that people loved this book’s portrayal of the city – she says ‘Some wrote from distant parts of the Empire saying they could never hope to see the "blessed, beastly place" again, but when the longing for it came over them, they could sit down with The Setons and smell the rain in the Glasgow streets.’

There are moments to surprise – Elizabeth is a classic Douglas heroine, wholly wonderful, but her friend says to her: "Ay, Elizabeth," she said, "you sound very humble, but I wouldn't like to buy you at your own valuation, my dear" ie - you are a good person, but you know it and are somewhat full of yourself.

There is a lovely touching moment when a solid, rather difficult young woman suddenly describes her fiance: “he liked me, he wanted to talk to me, he looked at me first when he came into the room. He's three years younger than me, and he's not at all good-looking, but he's mine, and when he looks at me I feel like a queen crowned."

And then – two thirds of the way through, O Douglas tackles the date head on. The book was published in 1917. This is what she says:

You know, of course, Gentle Reader, that there can be no end to this little chronicle? You know that when a story begins in 1913, 1914 will follow, and that in that year certainty came to an end, plans ceased to come to fruition—that, in fact, the lives of all of us cracked across. Personally, I detest tales that end in the air. I like all the strings gathered up tidily in the last chapter and tied neatly into nuptial knots….

… but, she says, she would have liked to be able to give everyone happy endings, but it is 1917 and she can’t say what will happen. Brave and unexpected.

 



Pink Sugar is as light as the name suggests, and deals with a set of people in a small Scottish town. Kirsty  has had a strange unsatisfactory life travelling the world with her stepmother and now wants to settle down and do good works.

This is 1924.

I was intrigued by this description:

‘you don’t look thirty, child. You can stand in that glare of revealing sun and work with spring flowers and fear nothing. You’re rather like a daffodil yourself, now that I come to think of it, with that green frock and cloud of pale yellow hair—your eyes are green too. Did you know that?’

‘Of course,’ said Kirsty, attempting to make a weak-kneed daffodil stand upright, ‘that’s why I’m so fond of jade. . . .’

Because it reminded me of a description from Clemence Dane’s Regiment of Women, from 1917:

 

Alwynne had certainly looked out of place at the mistresses' table, on the day of her arrival, with her yellow hair and green gown—"like a daffodil stuck into a bunch of everlastings," as an early adorer had described her. The phrase had appealed and spread, and within a week she was "Daffy" to the school…

Two books could hardly be more different than these two…



Green dress, not very yellow hair but the best I could do, NYPL.

Green dress at the top of the post, also NYPL – this distinctive style of illo from the 1910s

(Green dresses harder to find in pictures than other colours – was it less popular?)

Here is a judgement – in O-Douglas-world you are never in doubt as to which characters are nice and which aren’t. Where do you think someone who thinks books are messy comes…?

Mrs. M’Candlish did not care for many books lying about—nothing, she thought, gave a room such a littered look; so such volumes as the house contained were confined strictly to the study, where smoking was also allowed. The drawing-room was seldom used, except to impress visitors.

 

This same character later:

Mrs. M’Candlish looked at her watch—a quarter to seven. There would just be time to finish a story she was reading in The People’s Friend. She took the paper from a satin-lined work-basket (she did not care to leave it lying about in case any one thought the Friend, as she called it familiarly to herself, frivolous reading for a minister’s wife), and in a second she was absorbed.

Nothing wrong with The People’s Friend – ‘the world’s longest-running women’s weekly magazine’ – of course, and we managed to link it with the French Revolution in this post.

But THIS below is what a heroine should be like, in every respect. This is O Douglas Woman, with the correct surroundings, thoughts and lack of vanity despite being very beautiful:

 


All the windows stood wide open, and the chintz curtains swayed gently in the warm wind. The room was dainty with spotless muslin covers and cushions. A great bowl of roses stood on the dressing-table. Kirsty herself was a vision of delight in a soft white dress and a shady hat trimmed with roses. She was not thinking of what she looked like as she stood there before the mirror. She was smiling reminiscently at something Bill had said, and thinking of the hundred little pleasant things that went to make up her day.

Picture is A Young Woman with Roses by Alexandre-Jacques Chantron  from Wikimedia Commons.

 

In the comments on the bridge coat post, blogfriend Sovay mentioned this description from Carola Oman’s 1940 book Nothing to Report:

She was attired in a well-worn leather jacket, a crocus-coloured head-handkerchief tied under the chin, a brief tweed skirt of startling green and yellow checks, silk stockings, woollen socks, and brogues.

 

So I was intrigued to find this in Pink Sugar – surely they could have been best friends:

In the country Lady Carruthers affected somewhat bizarre raiment. This afternoon she wore a very short skirt of many colours, a jumper of a single violent hue, checked stockings and shoes so exaggerated in the way of tongues and heavy soles that they made her seem feather-footed. As she never walked a step if she could help it, there seemed little reason for such sporting attire.

Deep regrets that I can’t find illos for either of these…

So that’s ticked some O Douglas boxes – there will be more to come…

Comments

  1. My mother used to wear those jumpers...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Short puff sleeves seem 'in' at the moment (in shops, anyway) and they look irritating somehow, but I like the ones on the white frock. Startling green and yellow checks I'm not quite sure about!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't go for puff sleeves myself, but can never see them without thinking of Anne of Green Gables, who so wanted puff sleeves on a dress, and the lovely Matthew going to all that trouble to get such a garment for her...

      Delete
  3. Christine Harding24 April 2025 at 10:39

    I’ve read a lot of O Douglas books, and generally enjoyed them (especially Pink Sugar). They are nice, pleasant, easy reading with happy endings, but no great depth - and sometimes that is just what one wants. Occasionally, as you’ve shown, she surprises with more reflective observations, and she can be quite sharp about characters with pretensions. Have you read any Molly Clavering? Another Scottish author, younger than Anna Buchan, but their writing years overlap. I always think their lives and writing styles were similar. Her novels tend to be about nice, happy people, with nice happy endings, but she can be surprisingly sharp, and sometimes moves away from her usual format and comes up with something unexpected and slightly outside the box. As well as her novels she wrote short stories for People’s Friend - the kind of tales an O Douglas woman would enjoy! I find both authors enjoyable, if a little cloyingly sweet, and I have to counteract the effects of that by turning to the grimmer, bleaker world of Jean Rhys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jean Rhys a very different kind of writer!
      Writing this post made me think of Molly Clavering - I read Because of Sam https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2023/12/xmas-book-scenes-village-carol-service.html
      and enjoyed it very much, and I was thinking I must read more by her. I believe Clavering was a great friend of DE Stevenson, another in similar mode.
      Do you have any particular Molly Clavering recommendations?

      Delete
  4. "a young boy who is semi-adopted by a single woman"
    Not always a boy, and sometimes officially adopted in real life. Professional women - teachers. academics, civil servants etc - were often not allowed to marry or have children and they sometimes came back from holidays with unexpectedly "adopted" children. Maud Gonne is the best-known example, but Kipling's short story The Gardener has another example.

    "when a story begins in 1913, 1914 will follow..."
    It's an interesting aspect to literature then: two of my favourite novels -The Unbearable Bassington and The Good Soldier - were written and set just before WWI, and while their authors build up to tragic suicidal ends I can't help but think the heoes only needed to hang on a bit and their troubles would be ended anyway.
    Shaw's Heartbreak House is a superb example: begun before WWI as a Chekhovian tragicomedy, it ends with several of the characters being killed by bombs and the others happily looking forward to tomorrow's air raid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The unofficial nature of adoption covered a lot of things. Dorothy L Sayers child was sent off to live with a cousin, a single woman who looked after some other children too. Sayers was forever saying 'oh he will come and live with us soon' when she did get married (not to the father of the child) but that never happened. It all seemed rather sad and loveless. Rebecca West had a child by HG Wells - I don't know how widely that was known, but again, her son was very bitter about the arrangements for his upbringing.
      Where I grew up, there were families with a wide range of age among the children. It was not at all unknown for the youngest sibling to actually be the child of the oldest daughter. Someone was once telling me about her husband's family, a slightly involved tale, and I said 'Oh I see - that late adopted son was the child of X's big sister?' Oh no, was the response not at all. And it couldnt have been anyway, because the big sister was away doing a nursing course when this happened. Yes, well...

      Loving your perception on those two novels, great favourites of mine too, though I think I've said before that I find UB too sad for words and can't reread. Sadder than TGS... The image of him out in the colonies looking out over his domain lives with me.

      Delete
    2. Anthony West, Rebecca West's son, wrote a novel about his childhood, Heritage, in which he gave the hero the name Richard Savage, taken from Samuel Johson's friend who maintained he was the illegitimate son of the Cpintess of Macclesfield and that his mother tried to have him murdered.

      Delete
    3. I haven't read it, and I think I had assumed it was a memoir! But pretty clear it was a most unhappy relationship. Rebecca West tried to stop publication didn't she?

      Delete
    4. I don't think it could be published in the UK until after West had died.

      Delete
    5. I think I became aware of it then, around 1984, and perhaps read an excerpt. My memory is that I thought it would be some scandalous and gossipy tome, very shocking, and went no further when I realized that it was not...

      Delete
  5. I can see why you liked these, Moira. I do like Scotland/Borders settings for them, and I do love that description of Kirsty. I can see how the characters in these novels could be really interesting. Funny, isn't it, how one Buchan became more famous than the other - or did that happen...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They seemed like a very happy family, but I wonder if brother and sister had arguments over who had sold the most copies! It was a very gender-defined division - he writing what would be seen as very male novels, hers appealing more to women.

      Delete
  6. Thumbs down to Mrs M'Candlish on grounds of both bibliophobia and snobbery!

    I had never heard of O Douglas until she was highlighted on this blog; mind you I'm not that familiar with John Buchan, though I have read a few of his books and was aware of his Governor-Generalship of Canada. Adding "The Setons" to my list ...

    There's some superstition around green clothing - it's the colour of the Little People / Fair Folk / People of Peace (ie fairies) and wearing it may bring you to their notice, which is seldom a good thing. It's a particularly unlucky colour for a wedding dress.

    Is Lady Carruthers a golfer, by any chance? That description reminded me of the garment Wallace Chesney is hustled into buying in the PG Wodehouse story "The Magic Plus-Fours": "What might be termed the main motif of the fabric was a curious vivid pink, and with this to work on the architect had let his imagination run free, and had produced so much variety in the way of chessboard squares of white, yellow, violet, and green that the eye swam as it looked upon them."

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I've just registered that "she never walked a step if she could help it" - so presumably NOT a golfer.

      Sovay

      Delete
    2. Yes, green a difficul colour for various reasons. I remember reading once that it is difficult to 'layer' - so one could wear different shades of blue in an outfit, but this tends not to work with green. there was an explanation, but I can't remember what it was.
      That is a lovely bit of PGW! I think Lady Carruthers wanted to look sporty and active without actually doing anything.

      Delete
    3. It’s a pity Lady C lived in the days before the golf buggy - these days she could justify the sporty clothes with minimal movement.

      Sovay

      Delete
    4. Yes, excellent point, it would have been perfect for her.

      Delete
    5. Personally I love green for clothing (I have green eyes) and think that the only difficulty is finding it. Living in a country populated with lots of blond and blue-eyed people there are any number of blue things out there, but green? Not really, so if I spot a green dress in a shop I will pounce on it. (Just checked my wardrobe. Present number of dresses which are entirely green or have green as the dominating colour: fourteen.) I haven't thought of layering different greens, but I can see that it probably wouldn't work. I think the problem is that green can be either a warm or a cold colour, depending on how much yellow there is in it, but blue is always a cold colour. If you add yellow it ceases to be blue and becomes - green.

      Delete
    6. Very impressive, I can see you take your greens seriously. Your wardrobe and look sound wonderful...

      Delete
  7. Green could also kill you from arsenic poisoning. Arsenical green was a popular dye in the 1800s before people realized how dangerous it was. And still is, museums have to keep their green costume collections in special storage areas just to be on the safe side.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And unsafe in wallpaper too. There's a crime novel I read that involves green and arsenic, I must see if I can identify and reread it.

      Delete
    2. Isn’t there a theory that Napoleon died from the effects of arsenical green wallpaper? I didn’t know it was used in fabric dying though.

      Sovay

      Delete
    3. Yes, I remember hearing that about Napoleon, though some people doubt it?
      It does all put you off the colour....

      Delete
    4. Various books were removed from national libraries because they had arsenical green covers a few years ago. https://sites.udel.edu/poisonbookproject/ has information.
      You can see where Victorian poisoners got their poisons!

      Delete
    5. If the tale of the poisons were in a book we would condemn it as improbable fiction....

      Delete
    6. I've been reading D E Stevenson, and in one book a character is thinking about wearing green "next to the skin"--which seemed odd to me until I saw this thread!

      Delete
    7. Gosh - things we didn't even know we should be worried about!

      Delete
    8. "But Poirot, how did you know the victim was poisoned by arsenic from a book cover?"
      "Look at the paleness of the green dye on that volume. Some had obviously been removed."

      Pity Mrs Christie's dead, or I could charge her for the idea!

      Delete
    9. I think he could do one of his double clues/hints: 'but why is this book more worn than those around it?', leading you to wonder about the content, has it been more often read, what does it contain? - then springing on us that it was the dye in the cover...

      Delete
    10. Honestly, I have to say that the threats from arsenical greens have been GREATLY exaggerated. Yes, it was a thing, but it is very specific greens in very specific contexts from very specific dates, and somehow you never see as much hysteria and doomngloomery over arsenic PINKS or arsenic REDS or even arsenic BLACKS - all of which were a thing too. No, it's only green that gets everyone panicking, but the facts are that arsenic traces are virtually everywhere and at the same time, nowhere near as lethally ubiquitous as popular narratives would have it. Its a long, long complicated subject, but in a nutshell: arsenic greens are the metallic, true greens that DON'T turn blue or yellow under different lights, they have to be fixed as a paste or a pigment so green paint and pulps (like paper/card) are more likely to be arsenical than a wet-dyed fabric (arsenic isn't water soluble), so the dangerous pigment would need to be fixed on using starch or dressing or size (hence a heavily starched black mourning crape is much, much more likely to be dangerously arsenical than a green velvet), and there's also a very compelling theory that a lot of things that test positive for arsenic traces are actually contaminated by historic pest-control techniques in museums etc, where arsenic-containing powders were commonly used to tackle pest invasions which contaminated the exhibits - AND because green dresses are more likely to be colour-profiled, the dresses in other colours that were hanging next to the green dress at the time of the historic pest treatment are equally positive for traces of arsenic, but they're not getting tested because "only green dresses" right?

      Delete
    11. That is absolutely fascinating - thanks for giving us all such useful information, I certainly didn't know most of that.

      Delete
  8. The top picture is one of C Coles Phillips' "Fadeaway Girls" (who have also been used on the covers of Moray Dalton reprints).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the extra info - I literally was rereading the post and thought 'oh I didn't really say about that picture', so much appreciated!

      Delete
  9. And most of her books available as free downloads from the Canadian website Faded Page.

    (Must put in a plug for one of my favorite sites).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely! It's always so useful when you tell us how to find books

      Delete
  10. I think I did try one of her novels and it wasn't really for me. I prefer John Buchan actually!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sorry, that was Chrissie!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must try a John Buchan again - I loved them when I was a teenager but haven't done any re-reading since then, i'm intrigued to know what I'd make of them now.

      Delete
    2. Well, the 'of its time' factor does come into play rather often, but they are rattling good yarns, as Dick Hannah himself might out it. Would you like me to recommend one? xx

      Delete
    3. Well, there's The Thirty-Nine Steps, of course. However, The Three Hostages might be a good choice. It's a gripping read and Hannah's wife Mary plays an interesting part in it.

      Delete
    4. I remember 39 steps quite well, so might try another. I will look up The 3 Hostages.

      Delete
    5. You have to be prepared for some racial prejudice, really par for the course at this date, I think.

      Delete
  12. Graham Greene admired Buchan's last book, Sick Heart River. Of the books I've read, Witch Wood stands out, but it's historical, has a lot of Scottish dialogue and involves Calvinist theology, which aren't everybody's cups of tea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not even heard of Sick Heart River. Of the 3 x features you mention of Witch Wood, only the Scottish dialogue would put me off, I do find that difficult.

      Delete
  13. I am lucky enough to still have my wonderful mother and aunt, aged 97 and 95, and they would never wear green clothing or decorate their homes using green. I recently wore what I thought was a lovely shade of green to a wedding, and they did not approve. I didn't know about the use of arsenic in green dye, and I wonder if this dislike of green was a holdover from their mother's generation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lucky you, they sound great! and I think strong opinions keep you going...
      It's so interesting about - I know that the generation above me had superstitions about it's being unlucky, and that you couldn't wear it with blue 'blue and green, never should be seen' - but it didn't occur to me that there was a basis for it....

      Delete

Post a Comment