More Mourning, and O Douglas

Taken by the Hand  by O Douglas

published 1935

 

 


The new black lace dress that Beatrice wore did not fit. It was part of the “mourning order” she had given to the shop where she and her mother had been in the habit of getting most of their clothes. The head dressmaker had come herself—tightly encased in black satin, and sniffing mournfully, for she had sincerely liked the cheerful, considerate customer who had been so easy to dress—and advised Beatrice as to what she would need.

“Just a nice morning frock, and mebbe a coat and skirt, and something for the evening is all you need to begin with. Black is not worn as it used to be. I remember when it was a year’s deep black for a parent, but now it’s black and white or grey from the very start, and every vestige off before the year’s out. But I’m sure, Miss Be’trice, you’ll want to wear real mourning for your Mamma, for she was a dear soul.”

She slipped a frock over the girl’s head. “…Ucha, that’s not bad, Miss Be’trice. You’re stock size and that’s a great help at a time like this. . . . Look in the glass. D’you like it yourself? You can wear black with your hair and skin, and you should be thankful, for some people look awful! Though it’s wonderful, too, what you can do with a touch of white, and there’s this about black, I always say it subdues ladies who are too what you might call rash in their colours. You’d be surprised at the trouble I have, to keep high-coloured, full figures away from puce, and even bright red. Some of them seem to have no control over themselves with regard to colour—just like some people with drink—so it’s a mercy in a way, though of course it’s a pity for the reason, when they’re compelled to wear black. Yes, I don’t think you could do better than that. Will you try this lace dress? I thought it would be nice and soft for you and younger than satin or crepe de chine. You suit the cape at the back. Isn’t it awful graceful?”

 

comments: Mourning featured a lot on the blog last year, and it was wonderful to find so many people shared my fascination with it. So when I came across this passage at the beginning of Taken by the Hand I had to do another post for old times’ sake.

Our heroine Beatrice has just lost her mother, who was a well-to-do widow in Glasgow. The young woman has been cast adrift – although she has plenty of money, she now has no home. (It is very like the opening of Stella Gibbons’ Cold Comfort Farm, 1932, though Beatrice couldn’t be more different from Flora Poste.) Although annoyingly timid, Beatrice does get up enough courage eventually to ignore her dead mother and the dressmaker, and make her own decisions about another black dress, from That London:

Beatrice got herself into the new black velvet dress and decided that, expensive as it was, it was well worth the money. She had never looked so well in her life, and she wished, childishly, that her mother could see her… it made her look so slim and supple, and so dazzlingly fair. So she peacocked in front of the mirror, very well pleased with her own appearance

…first signs of life and backbone from a rather dim character.



Staunch blogfriend Shay recommended O Douglas books to me when we were considering the state of the world, as calming comfort reads. For me they are more distractions – I can spend my time being annoyed with the Douglas snobberies and smugness, which is preferable to being annoyed about the aforesaid state of the world.

This one was as weird as usual, but not as predictable as some – Beatrice has an unhappy time with her (much older) step-brother and his family in London, but then in a rather random way hooks up with a family in a small village in the Cotswolds, and goes to live with them, initially just for Christmas.

Most of the books are set in Scotland, so this one is an exception. It is strictly a cameo appearance by the dressmaker, who will be left behind in Glasgow: and FYI ‘ucha’ seems to be an all-purpose Glaswegian filler sound, one that features frequently in O Douglas’s books. ‘An exclamation indicating attentiveness or agreement’ apparently.

Beatrice makes a new family amongst her new friends, and eventually finds even more happiness. So no surprises there. There are village events, amateur theatricals, clothes to be thought about, romances to be encouraged. It is very readable, even for curmudgeonly me, though quite often annoying. I ended up reading ten O Douglas books one after another – Shay wholly to blame. And the world is still in a state. Oh well.

For anyone who read the very popular entry on bridge coats last week: no bridge coats in the work of O Douglas so far as I can tell, which is quite surprising. The books are full of genteel ladies come down in the world, and clothes descriptions, and evening parties, and bridge-playing, and Scottish cold weather – natural home of the bridge coat, you might think, but no. I got excited when I saw the words ‘Tweed bridge…’ together. A new departure I thought, expecting ‘coat’ to come next: tweed instead of black velvet, a Scottish variation perhaps, but it was an actual bridge, over the river. Tchah.

O Douglas was the pseudonym of Anna Buchan (sister of John...) and the books appear under both names. 

Top pictures, from an American catalogue, show black dresses of the era.

Black velvet dress, 1930s, from the State Library of Queensland.

Comments

  1. I know what you mean, Moira, about needing a certain sort of reading considering the current state of the world... It's interesting about wearing mourning. There used to be so many 'rules' about it, but except, perhaps, for the actual funeral, there aren't 'rules' now in that specified way. I wonder how that happened. I'm glad you enjoyed this read, even if there were annoying things about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps being annoyed by an author is better than being annoyed about the world! It can help to get lost in a place where mourning and its rules are very important.

      Delete
    2. I know just how you feel, I've been binge-reading almost non-stop since November. I appreciate being introduced to new authors on this blog!

      Delete
    3. ah now that is one thing I can say I can very much offer, though now you are making me wonder how many differe authors have featured - 2500+ posts, 2000+ different books. But how many authors... I must count up.

      Delete
  2. "....tweed instead of black velvet, a Scottish variation perhaps"--if that were so, it would say a lot about Scottish ideas of luxury!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wouldn't surprise me at all! They are practical people. I'm sure a good designer could make something fancy of a tweed bridge coat.

      Delete
  3. I’m trying to keep the state of the world at bay with Barbara Pym and EF Benson - I hadn’t really considered a counter-irritant, though if I do decide to give it a try Angela Thirkell (anything later than The Brandons) would probably be my choice.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good choices in the first place and then I hard agree on Thirkell. but she so has her moments!

      Delete
    2. That’s what I thought - no point throwing myself into eg Dan Brown as I won’t get past the first three sentences, whereas in the case of Angela Thirkell I know there’ll be much to amuse as well as much to annoy.

      These days I try to avoid new authors when in low spirits in case I don’t do them justice - I think the reason I never really took to Elly Griffiths’ Ruth Galloway series is that I started on them when at a low ebb and not enjoying anything, and they’ve had that association for me ever since. But if an old favourite fails to hit the spot I know it’s me not them.

      Sovay

      Delete
    3. Good points, all. At one time I kept a small shelf in my bedroom with a dozen fail-safers: if I couldn't sleep, woke in the night or couldn't face the latest prize-winner - they were there. I dismantled when life got better, but maybe should re-introduce.

      Delete
    4. I was looking at some of your blog posts from last year and someone mentioned Dornford Yates. Now HE would definitely be an irritant, although the annoying things about his books maybe come a little too close to the stuff that got the world into a terrible state!

      Delete
    5. On a brighter note, how about Wodehouse as a comfort read? There are some awful people in his books but he manages to make them funny.

      Delete
    6. Wodehouse (particularly Jeeves and Wooster) is very much a comfort read for me, but would be a counter-irritant for a friend of mine who finds his writing style too mannered and artificial; for the same reason she’s not amused by Sarah Caudwell’s books, the first three of which would be on my comfort reading shelf (not that I don’t like the last one, “The Sybil in her Grave” but I find it sad).

      Dornford Yates came to my mind too - maybe because he’s the same era as John Buchan - but definitely too irritating for the job!

      Sovay

      Delete
    7. All good suggestions, and everyone must find their own, but Dornford Yates too irritating for me. Wodenhouse and Caudwell would work very well though. Buchan I enjoyed very much as a young person, I should read something by him again. Much less annoying than Yates IIRC.

      Delete
  4. I like the sound of this, and also the velvet dress. The subject has reminded me of a time when I worked at a day centre for people with dementia, and arrived one morning to be told that I was the person to go to the funeral of one of our ladies who had recently died. I used to wear very colourful skirts, partly because the clients used to respond to the colours, and that day had on an extremely bright one. I said I wasn't dressed appropriately, but had to go all the same, and it felt very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had a friend who in similar circs went in to a charity shop near the church and bought a cheap dark skirt, which I think she donated back afterwards!
      Although the mourning rules have relaxed so much, I can understand your feeling awkward, even though surely no-one else noticed or minded.
      Sometimes there is a specific instruction that the dead person wanted colours at the funeral, but in the absence of such a clause, we still go dark-ish, or at least sober, don't we?

      Delete
  5. I haven't read it, but I wonder if Trollope's "He Knew He Was Right" would be effective as a counter-irritant. I saw a mini-series but it may not have followed the book closely. The plot made me think of Lady Laura's story in the Phineas Finn books which was not pleasant. The husband sounds nicer than Mr Kennedy but still could be very exasperating, and the wife's actions don't help matters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a good title, I always think. The BBC did a very good adaptation of it 20 years ago - I think I remember correctly that they played Suspicious Minds over the trailer which worked surprisingly well.
      I defiitely feel the need for more Trollope coming on.

      Delete
  6. "And the world is still in a state. Oh well."

    You were supposed to fix it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I clearly remember that YOU are going to fix it. Please.

      Delete
  7. Interesting that lace is “younger” than satin or crepe de Chine - certainly the model in the lace tunic in the top picture looks younger than the other two but that’s down to cut more than anything else - those gathers over the bosom always make for a matronly effect.

    I’m trying to work out what the woman in the velvet dress is wearing on the front of it; it looks suspiciously like Susan Wyse’s pet budgie that she accidentally sat on, and then had stuffed and wore as a brooch …

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well the state of the world is still terrible, but the budgie made me spit out my coffee laughing this morning. thank you!

      Delete
  8. Christine Harding8 April 2025 at 18:12

    I am intrigued by the outfit on the left of the top picture. Is it actually one garment? A top and a skirt? Or perhaps it’s two separate dresses (short over long), so when you arrive at your destination you can whip off the least appropriate!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you perhaps mean top right? a kind of lace over-tunic? Because I was intrigued by that one. In the bridge-coat entry there is a woman who cannibalizes 2 x garments to make a new dress (wartime make do and mend) and I have to say this dress looks something like that...

      Delete
    2. Christine Harding9 April 2025 at 14:29

      Thank you. And yes, I did mean top right. I always did get them muddled up!

      Delete
  9. I love the dressmaker's comment on colour-incontinent customers. What a pity she did not get to say and do more in the book. Disappointed that she sold poor Beatrice an ill-fitting frock, though...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, she was an excellent character. I was puzzled myself: Beatrice and her mother were meant to be well-dressed, and the dressmaker was meant to be very good, so what went wrong? I think Beatrice says she needed her mother to fiddle with the clothes to make them look right, there were some flappy bits! And I suppose there was an implication that this was all rather dated, and what suited her older widowed mother in Glasgow wasn't right for a young woman headed for London. But, honestly, I think Douglas didn't quite work it out, hadn't settled on the exact status of clothes and people!
      - and if she knew we were discussing it in detail 90 years later, would she be pleased, surprised...?

      Delete

Post a Comment