The Trial by Charlotte M Yonge
published 1864
(set in 1860 in part)
Last week's post looking at Graham Greene and a charity fete also had a strong Charlotte M Yonge connection
Graham Greene: The Man for a White Elephant Stall
so it seemed time for another look at her - I have been fascinated by her for a while.
Charlotte M Yonge’s first huge success was called The Daisy Chain. When I read it and wrote about it in 2020 I said this:
The chain is supposedly the family, but quite surprisingly that is scarcely mentioned: at the beginning one of the children says that Dr May thinks of his family as his Daisy Chain, and that’s about it. (TBH I had been fully expecting that the heroine would be called Daisy, rather than Ethel.)
One of the younger children, Gertrude, is called Daisy some of the time, because she is a key part of the chain, apparently. The title of this book – which is a sequel to The Daisy Chain – is equally surprising, in a completely different way. Having read several Yonge books by now, I assumed that the trial would be metaphorical or perhaps religious – troubles and challenges for Ethel and her siblings. Those difficulties and spiritual troubles abound…
But to my astonishment it is not a metaphor: someone dies –
is murdered – in the book and someone is brought to trial for the murder and
there is a mystery about what happened.
Could I have BEEN
more surprised? Of course as an Agatha Christie afficionado the crime
didn’t hold me up much – but then I have also (and I think uniquely) identified
a mistake in Agatha Christie about Charlotte M Yonge – do
consult this post.
But the trial and various related horrors and injustices
are only a part of the long eventful book.
Reading Yonge reminds you of the death rate then – too many
people wiped out by illnesses. Families ravaged: scarlet fever, typhus and we
assume consumption. Yonge doesn’t hold back. And so unsurprisingly there are
various descriptions of mourning (sometimes it seems surprising anyone was
ever out of it).
But we are of a lighter heart here, so we are going to
consider crinolines, a favourite topic of the moment.
Crinolines and their Comfort Zone
A bereaved young woman is being helped by a friend:
Mary then begged to remove her
tight heavy dress, and make her comfortable.
'Oh, I can't! Then I could not
go back.'
'Yes, you could; this is quite
a dress; besides, one can move so much more quietly without crinoline.'…
She stood up, and unfastened
her hooks. A mountain of mohair and scarlet petticoat remained on the floor,
upborne by an over-grown steel mouse-trap.
The date of 1860 is mentioned, which is very much peak
crinoline time.
Later, a group of them are in the local church and the
opportunity arises to climb the tower and get out onto the roof – ‘The ascent
of the tower was a feat performed two or three times in a lifetime at
Stoneborough.’ Up they go:
At last, Aubrey, who was
foremost, pushed up the trap-door, and emerged; but, as Dickie followed him,
exclaimed, 'Here we are; but you ladies in crinolines will never follow! You'll
stick fast for ever, and Leonard can't pass, so there you'll all have to stay.'
'Aunt Daisy will sail away
like a balloon,' added Dickie, roguishly, looking back at her, and holding on
his cap. But Gertrude vigorously compressed her hoop, and squeezed through,
followed by Ethel and Leonard.
As is only natural in a Yonge book, the expedition almost
ends in disaster – someone falling over the battlements – and Gertrude is ‘confused and distressed… by
the puffs of wind at her hoop’ ie her crinoline, which is quite hard to
imagine.
Elsewhere – one family heads off for America (to escape
disgrace and shame), while a child, a young relative, is sent from New Zealand
to England to stay with the core family..
Yonge always good for a weird Victorian health issue:
Averil had been subject to
distressing attacks of gasping and rigidity, often passing into faintness; and
though at the moment of emotion she often showed composure and self-command,
yet that nature always thus revenged herself.
There is a romance going wrong with people misunderstanding
each other. (No wonder Patricia Wentworth’s Miss Silver liked Charlotte
M Yonge so much)
The weirdness to modern eyes of not telling members of a
family what else is going on, so in one case a child literally doesn’t know if
her brother is alive or dead.
Yonge doesn’t hold back on who is facing not much future…
Life, for the last five years,
had been mournful work; there had been one year of blind self-will, discord,
and bitterness, then a crushing stroke, and the rest exhausted submission and
hopeless bending to sorrow after sorrow, with self-reproach running through
all. Wearied out, she was glad to lay down the burthen, and accept the evening
gleam as sunset radiance, without energy to believe it as the dawn of a
brighter day.
It gets a bit much – but then, Yonge is not exaggerating
the dangers and deaths. A visit to any UK graveyard of the era will show you
stones with too many child deaths, families half-wiped out, women dying in
childbirth.
Meanwhile the tougher members of the families in the book
are out converting the heathen in a way that does not suit modern eyes. Religion
plays a major, and unabashed, part in the books, and presumably that was part
of their attraction for many.
Caroline and Annie Cheviot were ladylike, nice-looking girls; but when they found no croquet mallets in the garden, they seemed at a loss what life had to offer...
'I used to garden once, but we have no flower-beds now, they spoilt the lawn for croquet.'
Tom...observed that he had seen the Andersons knocking about the balls in the new gardens by the river; and proposed to go down and try to get up a match.
It is clear that Ethel and Charlotte do not think much of the idea of turning the garden into a croquet lawn, but equally don't think much of the idea of playing it in a public place.
More about Yonge in other posts – including this one listing her famous (and frankly astonishing) fans.
And, here's a shoutout for her modern fans:
Charlotte M. Yonge – The Charlotte M. Yonge Fellowship
is the website to go to - see comment below
File:Winslow Homer - Croquet Scene - Google Art Project.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
October
20, 1865 | Dillon family group including Lord Clonbr… | Flickr


This is really interesting, Moira. Among so many other things that got my attention, there's so much here about the real risks to life and health at the time. We take some things so much for granted in these times, and although I know that's not the main point of the story, really, it struck me as I read your post. It's little wonder so many books of the time feature mourning clothes and funerals and so on.
ReplyDeleteI know, exactly. And sometimes the reader can feel a little impatient with 19th C character worrying about various health issues, and then we have to remind ourselves - there weren't the fixes we are lucky enough to have.
DeleteWhen I was doing research on stepfamilies in 19th century literature, I realised that one reason why there were so many both in fiction and in real life was that consumption was a disease that killed off so many young people, including young mothers. And something we have forgotten now is that having a miscarriage could kill as infection could follow. Life was precarious in a way that we have entirely forgotten with the advent of antibiotics. Chrissie
ReplyDeleteIndeed! Strep throat, when not treated with antibiotics, can lead to rheumatic fever, which was probably responsible for many of the "declines" that were not TB. Even past the middle of the 19th century, as germ theory began to take hold, I'm sure there were many local doctors who still didn't believe it or didn't manage to get patients to follow hand-washing etc techniques that could prevent or slow the transfer of disease. And of course to wash hands and anything else, you need a good water supply, so it helps to be at least middle class.
DeleteIndeed Chrissie, it's always worth remembering that there were so many broken families then - not caused by divorce but death.
DeleteAnd yes Dame E, for us in the west things have changed so dramatcially with medicines and running water, we can be endlessly grateful.
I think consumption was used by some authors as just a plot device, and became something of a cliche. (Remember Ali McGraw's character in Love Story? Something like that.) In reality it must have been pretty bad, a nasty way to go.
Deleteit was a horrendous disease (despite my callous comment below). People called it the white plague, which sounds calm, but far from it - drowning in your own blood. A couple of years ago I read a shed-load of books about 20th c TB, those set in sanatoria, and the whole idea has haunted me since.
DeleteI wonder if Yonge tried out the hoop compressing, to see if it would work getting through a narrow space? I do like the painting.
ReplyDeletePerhaps Averil had low blood pressure, which would account for the faintness, but not for the rigidity. Either way, in real life it would probably be put down to hysteria.
It's a great picture isnt it? I think she knew how to manoeuvre a hoop, although not wholly in favour of them. The scene at the tower has the air of something that actually happened
DeleteA seizure disorder?
DeleteI love these knowledgeable medical diagnoses! It never occurs to me that they might be anything other than Random Victorian Disease. Count the coughs to see who'll be dead by the end of the book.
DeletePerhaps Avril had epilepsy? Chrissie
ReplyDeleteVery possible, or blood pressure as above.... but I think just generalized Victorian feebleness
DeleteI'm intrigued by the red over garment ( I can't think what else to call it) in the picture. It appears to be draped around and tied over one shoulder which would hinder playing croquet, I think?
ReplyDeleteI hadn't looked at it that closely but now i do see what you mean. Perhaps it was the latest fashion, and more important than winning!
DeleteNow I can’t stop looking at the red garment - some sort of maternity wear? I don’t know what that would have looked like at that time. Or 1860s athleisure?
DeleteNerys
Once it's pointed out you can't see anything else, can you?
DeleteMaybe it's a sort of pinafore, to keep her frock clean--but I would think it would be more necessary to protect the frills at the hemline!
DeleteOr some kind of two-piece addition? the woman on the left has two fitted matching pieces, maybe the red is a looser version of that?
DeleteIt's a red hooded cloak worn off one shoulder and tucked under the arm closest to us, with the hood hanging down her back
Deletethanks Daniel, excellent! We should have just gone straight to you and asked you
DeleteI'm glad you enjoyed The Trial, Moira. What to read next? There are some good bits about clothes and accessories in Clever Woman of the Family and The Three Brides. CWF is perhaps the better book. And for those who are interested in CMY, here is an unashamed plug for the CMY Fellowship - find out more by following the link under my name above.
ReplyDeleteHere is the website address https://charlottemyonge.org.uk/cmy/
ReplyDeleteThanks Alys, I think I have CWF next on my list! And I will put the details in the main body of the post.
DeleteCWF also has croquet (including croquet accident), childbirth complications and a diphtheria scare, as well as the crinoline accident and thoughts on the restrictions in women's lives.
DeleteA lot to look forward to!
Delete