She died Dancing by Kelley Roos

She died Dancing by Kelley Roos

 aka The Blonde Died Dancing

published 1956 or 1957




 

Did I wish this book into existence? No, I weirdly don’t have that power, but consider this: there was a ballroom dancing school in a book I featured last year, and I literally said in the post on Dead Wrong by Stewart Sterling

I felt I could happily have had a whole other book based round the dance salon.

And here it is!

She Died Dancing gets going quickly and doesn’t slacken off. We are in 1950s New York, and narrator Connie is concerned about her husband Steve: he is sneaking off for secret appointments, is he having an affair? She follows him one day, and discovers him with a tall, willowy, ravishing female. Of course it turns out that he is having dancing lessons in order to please his wife. All well and good, but then, during the spying/stalking/foxtrotting session, his dancing teacher, Anita, is murdered. Connie was there outside the studio, and would in fact be an excellent witness to the fact that Steve must have done it, but obviously she believes in her man. The police haven’t tracked him down yet so the young couple set out to find the real killer. This involves Connie taking over the dead Anita’s job – ie she is suddenly teaching dancing – while she tries to establish who might have had a motive and an opportunity, as the studio seems to have been inaccessible. It turns out, surprise surprise, that everyone within a 50-yard radius is inter-connected, and not just as work colleagues or pupils.

There is a lot of visiting bars, and racing round New York and breaking into apartments and climbing on roofs, and there is a slightly forced deadline whereby if they don’t solve the crime ‘by 4 o’clock Saturday’, Steve will be arrested. The crime is featured prominently in the tabloid press and the whole of Manhattan is apparently involved in the manhunt – the missing murderer is excellently known as The Waltzer: ‘any news about the Waltzer?...He should be shot on sight.’ And there is even some lipstick detection.

The book is – of course – very much of its time.

The women are all competing for men, and the main thing that matters is looks, but – to win the prize you have to be sexy and beautiful, but also look as though you will make a good wife and mother later. It must have been exhausting. Connie has to dye her hair blonde to try to hang on to her husband.



Anita and then Connie are teaching the men of New York ballroom dances, so the men in turn can deal with women in nightclubs and restaurants – waltzes, foxtrots, rhumba, samba, (all very Strictly Come Dancing), and these are individual lessons. There are group lessons at the school, but those are obviously of no interest in terms of romance, suspicion, blackmail, murder opportunities. One of the other dance teachers has the splendid name of Hooray Rose.

Was there really so much demand for dance schools as implied in these two books?

The owner of the school, Mr Bell, tells Connie that his three sons are at Harvard, Yale and Princeton.

“Well!” she replies “And where did you go to school?”

“Arthur Murray’s” Mr Bell said.

Arthur Murray’s was a very famous nationwide chain of dance schools, as featured in the advert here (making no bones about why you would want to learn to dance). There is a remark about how it was cheaper for Mr Bell to start the school than to pay for lessons for those three sons, and though this is a joke, there is the clear implication -  along with the fancy expensive colleges - that there was a lot of money to be made in the business.



And then what else should pop up but a

‘smart receptionist with bejewelled glasses… A brunette with glamorous eyeglasses – a smoothie with hopped-up spectacles… She made me wonder if I shouldn’t invest in a pair of those gold-bedecked, odd-shaped glasses.’

Such fancy spectacles were the subject of much discussion in another blogpost last year, on The Wife of Ronald Sheldon by Patrick Quentin. So I’m calling it that these were the new and very fashionable harlequin frames – read more about their history in the blogpost (original research by CiB you see).

And yet another connection:

Steve is being chatted up by a flirtatious woman, and says he is married. ‘What’s she like?’ says the flirty one.

‘About five-five, weighs 122. She’s right-handed.’

Now, this is meant to be a bit weird (flirty girl was expecting, presumably, ‘she’s a beautiful brunette’) but even so bears out my contention – in a recent post on Ross Macdonald – that characters in American fiction are all too ready to estimate each other’s weight, in a manner unfamiliar in the UK.

I read about Kelley Roos over at Jim Noy’s The Invisible Event blog: not a writer I was familiar with but I am, as ever, grateful for the tipoff. (Apparently there is a series with regular sleuths Jeff & Haila Troy, but this is a standalone.) The book is action-packed, fast-moving, amusing, entertaining

Couple with a definite air of the sleuthing pair – from Vivat tumbler.

Three girls in their summer dresses, with a definite air of the dancing teachers, Queensland State Library.

Arthur Murray dance school advert File:1953 - Arthur Murray Dance - 12 Jul MC - Allentown PA.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Comments

  1. This is one of the Roos that I have not read, but the setting sounds ideal for Clothes in Books!!
    I have mostly read series books by the Roos - maybe the first couple are the best. I think I've tried two non-series, but for me I felt the puzzle/plot factor was best in the earlier books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very helpful, I will definitely try the series books, thanks

      Delete
  2. Never heard of this author but the book sounds worth adding to the search list - affordable copies of their work on Abe all seem to be in French or German though ...

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting that they were popular in those countries. I certainly enjoyed this one.

      Delete
  3. ‘About five-five, weighs 122. She’s right-handed.’ Boxing estimate? Stay out of her way? Don't annoy her? (Lucy)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed. Martial arts maybe....

      Delete
    2. "My baby wrestles in the ring
      My baby she's the sweetest thing
      She's as pretty as a rose
      If you disagree she'll smash your nose

      "She's a backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
      A buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
      uUH buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
      uUH buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
      ...
      "Five-foot-two
      Knows Kung-Fu
      SHE'LL TEAR THE HEART RIGHT OUT OF YOU!"

      Delete
  4. This does sound fun, Moira, if of its time. Trust you to find a book that focuses on dance studios and teaching dancing. And I haven't heard of Arthur Murray in years!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know - I knew the name and then it all came back to me. It was interesting to look him up and see that his dance school empire reached all over the world - and is still going!

      Delete
  5. In that era, I would have been called Connie but I really don't like that nickname! I have been on quite a few New York rooftops but for parties, not chases!

    My father had a big legal win early in his career as a lawyer against Arthur Murray's when a Boston instructor was persuading lonely widows to give him money as well as pay for dancing lessons! The lawyer representing Arthur Murray's lost the case but became very rich defending corporations - and they remained cordial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It sounds to me like you have the beginnings of a novel plot right there in your father's story!

      Delete
  6. This sounds a lot of fun. I suppose it was only a few years after this was published that young people didn't need to learn to dance. A different world ...

    ReplyDelete
  7. And that was Chrissie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes very much another time - and it was seen as very important I think

      Delete
  8. The title reminds me of the spoof titles in Richard Hoggart's The Uses of Literacy (was one of them Death Cab For Cutie?)!

    One of my teachers also ran a dance school, I found out a lot later, though it was common knowledge at the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it does sound like the archetypal title. and I would always be tempted by any such book...

      Delete
    2. Yes, it was Richard Hoggart and then the title was used for a song by the Bonzo Dog Do-Dah band in the sixties and then in the 1990s I think it inspired the name of a rather good American band. I know you like these kinds of connection, Moira ... Chrissie

      Delete
    3. What a disappointment! I knew that Death Cab for Cutie was named after a pulp thriller, but did not know that it was an invented one. I must find my copy and see what other things he invented - he obviously had an eye for it.

      Delete
  9. Maybe it was Fred & Ginger's fault that there was such a demand for dancing schools....They really did make dancing synonymous with romancing! I think I may have started this book but gave up on it, probably at the point where Connie goes blonde in order to "compete" with hubby's supposed lady-friend. I guess it was too much of-its-time for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point - there was always that feeling that Fred and Ginger cheered everyone up during the depression with their remote-from-real-life scenarios, and dancing is very good for taking you out of yourself.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The book sounds like fun, but difficult to find ad probably very expensive. However, I’ve had a lovely meander following your links here, and the links in those posts and so on. I got lost returning, because I was so fascinated by Venetian carnival masks, and glasses (spectacles, not drinking receptacles) and had to look them up, along with silk (I’ve always been fascinated by the Silk Road) and herring fishing - my Norwegian great grandfather had a fishing fleet, so I’ve taken in a bit of family history as well. Christine Harding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh how nice - thank you, it makes my day when someone can do that. I like to think we are eclectic here, and as Chrissie (another Christine!) says above, I do love to link things up...

      Delete
  12. This is an author I have not read at all, and I thought I did not even have any of her books, but I found one. The Frightened Stiff, published in 1942, and my copy is from the Rue Morgue Press, with a skeleton on the cover.

    I haven't been that interested in books by Roos because of the emphasis on humor but I am more open to humor in mysteries now.

    Chrissie's comment about young people not needing to learn to dance was interesting. I did take ballroom dancing lessons for a while when I was in 7th or 8th grade (so about 1960), but never ever used them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please read it and let me know how it goes Tracy! I am the same re humour in mysteries - I was very against it in earlier days, but will cautious try those books now. This one I did enjoy.

      I think ballroom dancing never disappears altogether, it comes and goes. Young people once were told they HAD to know how to do those dances - that wouldn't happen now, but people do it for fun. The British show Strictly is so popular that I think it must have had a positive effect on people taking it up.
      I know two people who met their life partner at ballroom dancing lessons!

      Delete
  13. "Of course it turns out that he is having dancing lessons in order to please his wife." Sounds like the plot of that Richard Gere movie from about twenty years ago ("Shall We Dance").

    In 1963 I was fitted for my first pair of glasses; they were harlequin, with tiny little sparkles set into the frame. I hated them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "We've found the glasses for you. Now, let's test your eyesight."

      Delete
    2. I very much enjoyed that movie, and the soundtrack is exceptional - I listen to it regularly, it has wonderful music on it.
      I think it was based on a Japanese film, which I sought out at one point...
      I think things are better for children who need glasses these days, I hope so.

      Delete
    3. I don't remember what my first pair of glasses looked like, but I remember the feeling of "who washed the world?"

      Delete

Post a Comment