She died Dancing by Kelley Roos
published 1956 or 1957
Did I wish this book into existence? No, I weirdly don’t
have that power, but consider this: there was a ballroom dancing school in a
book I featured last year, and I literally said in the post on Dead
Wrong by Stewart Sterling
I felt I could happily have
had a whole other book based round the dance salon.
And here it is!
She Died Dancing gets
going quickly and doesn’t slacken off. We are in 1950s New York, and narrator Connie
is concerned about her husband Steve: he is sneaking off for secret appointments,
is he having an affair? She follows him one day, and discovers him with a tall,
willowy, ravishing female. Of course it turns out that he is having dancing
lessons in order to please his wife. All well and good, but then, during the
spying/stalking/foxtrotting session, his dancing teacher, Anita, is murdered.
Connie was there outside the studio, and would in fact be an excellent witness
to the fact that Steve must have done it, but obviously she believes in her man.
The police haven’t tracked him down yet so the young couple set out to find the
real killer. This involves Connie taking over the dead Anita’s job – ie she is
suddenly teaching dancing – while she tries to establish who might have had a
motive and an opportunity, as the studio seems to have been inaccessible. It
turns out, surprise surprise, that everyone within a 50-yard radius is inter-connected,
and not just as work colleagues or pupils.
There is a lot of visiting bars, and racing round New York
and breaking into apartments and climbing on roofs, and there is a slightly
forced deadline whereby if they don’t solve the crime ‘by 4 o’clock Saturday’,
Steve will be arrested. The crime is featured prominently in the tabloid press
and the whole of Manhattan is apparently involved in the manhunt – the missing
murderer is excellently known as The Waltzer: ‘any news about the Waltzer?...He
should be shot on sight.’ And there is even some lipstick detection.
The book is – of course – very much of its time.
The women are all competing for men, and the main thing that
matters is looks, but – to win the prize you have to be sexy and beautiful, but
also look as though you will make a good wife and mother later. It must have
been exhausting. Connie has to dye her hair blonde to try to hang on to her
husband.
Anita and then Connie are teaching the men of New York
ballroom dances, so the men in turn can deal with women in nightclubs and restaurants –
waltzes, foxtrots, rhumba, samba, (all very Strictly Come Dancing), and
these are individual lessons. There are group lessons at the school, but those
are obviously of no interest in terms of romance, suspicion, blackmail, murder
opportunities. One of the other dance teachers has the splendid name of Hooray
Rose.
Was there really so much demand for dance schools as
implied in these two books?
The owner of the school, Mr Bell, tells Connie that his
three sons are at Harvard, Yale and Princeton.
“Well!” she replies “And where
did you go to school?”
“Arthur Murray’s” Mr Bell said.
Arthur Murray’s was a very famous nationwide chain of dance schools, as featured in the advert here (making no bones about why you would want to learn to dance). There is a remark about how it was cheaper for Mr Bell to start the school than to pay for lessons for those three sons, and though this is a joke, there is the clear implication - along with the fancy expensive colleges - that there was a lot of money to be made in the business.
And then what else should pop up but a
‘smart receptionist with
bejewelled glasses… A brunette with glamorous eyeglasses – a smoothie with
hopped-up spectacles… She made me wonder if I shouldn’t invest in a pair of
those gold-bedecked, odd-shaped glasses.’
Such fancy spectacles were the subject of much discussion
in another blogpost last year, on The
Wife of Ronald Sheldon by Patrick Quentin. So I’m calling it
that these were the new and very fashionable harlequin frames – read more about
their history in the blogpost (original research by CiB you see).
And yet another connection:
Steve is being chatted up by a flirtatious woman, and says
he is married. ‘What’s she like?’ says the flirty one.
‘About five-five, weighs 122.
She’s right-handed.’
Now, this is meant to be a bit weird (flirty girl was
expecting, presumably, ‘she’s a beautiful brunette’) but even so bears out my
contention – in a recent
post on Ross Macdonald – that characters in American fiction are
all too ready to estimate each other’s weight, in a manner unfamiliar in the
UK.
I read about Kelley Roos over at Jim Noy’s The
Invisible Event blog: not a writer I was familiar with but I
am, as ever, grateful for the tipoff. (Apparently there is a series with
regular sleuths Jeff & Haila Troy, but this is a standalone.) The book is action-packed,
fast-moving, amusing, entertaining
Couple with a definite air of the sleuthing pair – from Vivat tumbler.
Three girls in their summer dresses, with a definite air of
the dancing teachers, Queensland
State Library.
Arthur Murray dance school advert File:1953 - Arthur Murray Dance - 12 Jul MC - Allentown PA.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
This is one of the Roos that I have not read, but the setting sounds ideal for Clothes in Books!!
ReplyDeleteI have mostly read series books by the Roos - maybe the first couple are the best. I think I've tried two non-series, but for me I felt the puzzle/plot factor was best in the earlier books.
Very helpful, I will definitely try the series books, thanks
DeleteNever heard of this author but the book sounds worth adding to the search list - affordable copies of their work on Abe all seem to be in French or German though ...
ReplyDeleteSovay
Interesting that they were popular in those countries. I certainly enjoyed this one.
Delete‘About five-five, weighs 122. She’s right-handed.’ Boxing estimate? Stay out of her way? Don't annoy her? (Lucy)
ReplyDeleteYes indeed. Martial arts maybe....
Delete"My baby wrestles in the ring
DeleteMy baby she's the sweetest thing
She's as pretty as a rose
If you disagree she'll smash your nose
"She's a backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
A buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
uUH buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
uUH buh-backbreaker, she's a backbreaker
...
"Five-foot-two
Knows Kung-Fu
SHE'LL TEAR THE HEART RIGHT OUT OF YOU!"
This does sound fun, Moira, if of its time. Trust you to find a book that focuses on dance studios and teaching dancing. And I haven't heard of Arthur Murray in years!
ReplyDeleteI know - I knew the name and then it all came back to me. It was interesting to look him up and see that his dance school empire reached all over the world - and is still going!
DeleteIn that era, I would have been called Connie but I really don't like that nickname! I have been on quite a few New York rooftops but for parties, not chases!
ReplyDeleteMy father had a big legal win early in his career as a lawyer against Arthur Murray's when a Boston instructor was persuading lonely widows to give him money as well as pay for dancing lessons! The lawyer representing Arthur Murray's lost the case but became very rich defending corporations - and they remained cordial.
It sounds to me like you have the beginnings of a novel plot right there in your father's story!
DeleteThis sounds a lot of fun. I suppose it was only a few years after this was published that young people didn't need to learn to dance. A different world ...
ReplyDeleteAnd that was Chrissie.
ReplyDeleteYes very much another time - and it was seen as very important I think
DeleteThe title reminds me of the spoof titles in Richard Hoggart's The Uses of Literacy (was one of them Death Cab For Cutie?)!
ReplyDeleteOne of my teachers also ran a dance school, I found out a lot later, though it was common knowledge at the time.
Yes it does sound like the archetypal title. and I would always be tempted by any such book...
DeleteYes, it was Richard Hoggart and then the title was used for a song by the Bonzo Dog Do-Dah band in the sixties and then in the 1990s I think it inspired the name of a rather good American band. I know you like these kinds of connection, Moira ... Chrissie
DeleteWhat a disappointment! I knew that Death Cab for Cutie was named after a pulp thriller, but did not know that it was an invented one. I must find my copy and see what other things he invented - he obviously had an eye for it.
DeleteMaybe it was Fred & Ginger's fault that there was such a demand for dancing schools....They really did make dancing synonymous with romancing! I think I may have started this book but gave up on it, probably at the point where Connie goes blonde in order to "compete" with hubby's supposed lady-friend. I guess it was too much of-its-time for me.
ReplyDeleteGood point - there was always that feeling that Fred and Ginger cheered everyone up during the depression with their remote-from-real-life scenarios, and dancing is very good for taking you out of yourself.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe book sounds like fun, but difficult to find ad probably very expensive. However, I’ve had a lovely meander following your links here, and the links in those posts and so on. I got lost returning, because I was so fascinated by Venetian carnival masks, and glasses (spectacles, not drinking receptacles) and had to look them up, along with silk (I’ve always been fascinated by the Silk Road) and herring fishing - my Norwegian great grandfather had a fishing fleet, so I’ve taken in a bit of family history as well. Christine Harding.
ReplyDeleteOh how nice - thank you, it makes my day when someone can do that. I like to think we are eclectic here, and as Chrissie (another Christine!) says above, I do love to link things up...
DeleteThis is an author I have not read at all, and I thought I did not even have any of her books, but I found one. The Frightened Stiff, published in 1942, and my copy is from the Rue Morgue Press, with a skeleton on the cover.
ReplyDeleteI haven't been that interested in books by Roos because of the emphasis on humor but I am more open to humor in mysteries now.
Chrissie's comment about young people not needing to learn to dance was interesting. I did take ballroom dancing lessons for a while when I was in 7th or 8th grade (so about 1960), but never ever used them.
Please read it and let me know how it goes Tracy! I am the same re humour in mysteries - I was very against it in earlier days, but will cautious try those books now. This one I did enjoy.
DeleteI think ballroom dancing never disappears altogether, it comes and goes. Young people once were told they HAD to know how to do those dances - that wouldn't happen now, but people do it for fun. The British show Strictly is so popular that I think it must have had a positive effect on people taking it up.
I know two people who met their life partner at ballroom dancing lessons!
"Of course it turns out that he is having dancing lessons in order to please his wife." Sounds like the plot of that Richard Gere movie from about twenty years ago ("Shall We Dance").
ReplyDeleteIn 1963 I was fitted for my first pair of glasses; they were harlequin, with tiny little sparkles set into the frame. I hated them.
"We've found the glasses for you. Now, let's test your eyesight."
DeleteI very much enjoyed that movie, and the soundtrack is exceptional - I listen to it regularly, it has wonderful music on it.
DeleteI think it was based on a Japanese film, which I sought out at one point...
I think things are better for children who need glasses these days, I hope so.
I don't remember what my first pair of glasses looked like, but I remember the feeling of "who washed the world?"
Delete