The Mind of Mr JG Reeder by Edgar Wallace

The Mind of Mr JG Reeder by Edgar Wallace

collection of short stories, published 1925

 


Margaret hardly knew what to expect when she came into the flamboyant foyer of the Orpheum. What was the evening equivalent to the square-topped derby and the tightly-buttoned frock-coat of ancient design which [Mr Reeder] favoured in the hours of business? She would have passed the somewhat elegantly dressed gentleman in the correct pique waistcoat and the perfectly tied butterfly bow, only he claimed her attention.

‘Mr Reeder!’ she gasped.

It was indeed Mr Reeder: with not so much as a shirt-stud wrong; with a suit of the latest  mode, and shoes glossy and V-toed. For Mr Reeder, like many other men, dressed according to his inclination in business hours, but accepted blindly the instructions of his tailor in the matter of fancy raiment

He took her cloak. He had previously purchased programmes and a large box of chocolates, which he carried by a satin ribbon.


comments: Mr JG Reeder was mentioned in the comments on this recent post:

King of Tosh: E Phillips Oppenheim

And he has popped up a few times before btl, with great enthusiasm from readers, and I knew I should look at the stories again.  I first read them in the early 1970s, when there was a hugely enjoyable TV series based on them.

Wallace and Oppenheim seem to go together – dashing writers, very productive, giving the impression of enjoying their own lives, and the lives of their characters.

Mr JG Reeder is great fun: he looks and acts like a dull dusty senior civil servant, but actually has an investigative connection with the Public Prosecutor’s office, and has ‘the mind of a criminal’.

This means that despite his uninspiring appearance and manner, he has deep knowledge  of criminal history, and an unerring instinct for what the bad guys will do next. Many of the stories consist of a crook thinking he has got the better of Mr JGR, while we know that he will be one step ahead of them.

The tales can be somewhat gruesome, and with a very casual attitude to the death of criminals.

The collection I have has eight stories, and that’s about right for one sitting – I don’t know if there are more, and I would read them, but after a gap. During the course of them, Mr JGR embarks on a slow-moving romance, which we hope will end happily. However a certain kind of modern reader will disapprove, as there is a large age-gap, he is much older than his young lady. [people objecting to age-gaps in fiction, particularly old school novels, is a thing that annoys me very much. The author made it up, it didn’t happen, and who are you to object?]

There are some intriguing moments – a young man is worried about the ‘boudoir atmosphere’ in the office where his girlfriend works, a phrase I liked very much.

There is a lot of what you might call scampering around, weird ideas in people’s heads, and out-and-out melodrama. Some of it reminded me of Agatha Christie’s Parker Pyne mysteries – no bad thing. In one of those, The Case of the Discontented Soldier, there is talk of  a traditional fictional trope of people being trapped in a cellar with water rising and threatening to drown them. Mr Parker Pyne suggets to Ariadne Oliver (an early appearance) that it is a cliched, unoriginal idea, but she is not having it: “People are used to reading about such things as water rising in a cellar….Knowing about it beforehand gives it an extra thrill….The public is conservative, Mr Pyne, it likes the old well-worn gadgets.” On first reading that I literally thought ‘but I’ve never come across that at all’. And here it is! In a Wallace/Reeder story called The Investors.

It’s possible Wallace was better at short stories than novels – he gets slapdash and careless details in long form, more chance of staying on track with short stories.

But even in these stories author or reader can get lost. Mr Reeder and a villainess are on either side of a closed door. This section took ages to parse:

In a second there was a jagged gap [in the door] through which the black muzzle of an automatic was thrust.

‘Put down that jug or I will blow your features into comparative chaos!’ said Mr Reeder pedantically.

I didn’t know which party was holding the automatic, and I wondered how Mr R could see the jug, but also wondered if this was some esoteric slang. ‘Put down that jug…’ has a certain ring.

He sees the woman concerned: ‘in her hand was a huge enamelled iron jug’. Not a metaphor then. I will not trouble you with the means by which the jug becomes a deadly weapon, which must be dropped.

All great fun.



Not much in the way of clothes, I think Wallace didn’t have time to put long descriptions. But there is a Russian Princess, Pauline Dimitroff, small dark and beautiful. But is she a real princess?

And a certain amount of general high life, Mayfair clubs, and the trip to theatre. So some random well-dressed women as well as the 1923 theatre foyer picture.

Comments

  1. Thanks, Moira. I had a good laugh when I read this. 'Put down that jug' could become a catchphrase. I remember enjoying these ages ago. Wallace could be sloppy as you say but I feel he makes up for that with the verve with which he writes. Now I want to read them again. Chrissie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly - it was enjoyable in all kinds of different ways

      Delete
  2. I am pretty sure I have encountered the "water rising in a" idea in a Paul Temple story. Francis Durbridge was not shy about using clichés.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes he had an eye for what appealed to people, and that would have been much later.
      Actually I've just had a flashback to the early puppet drama Stingray (precursor to Thunderbirds on children's TV) and pretty sure there was an epi with rising wate threatening the heroes.

      Delete
    2. I remember a Paul Temple film with the water-rising situation, too, maybe the same story? In a whole 'nother kind of story, I have a vague memory of Lucy and Ethel being in that predicament?

      Delete
    3. I think you are overestimating how much UK readers know about US TV Marty! After considerable thought I decided that you might be talking about Lucille Ball?

      Delete
    4. Marty, I think they were trapped in a shower cubicle. Of course we are speaking of the marvelous Lucille Ball and Vivian Vance.
      Nerys

      Delete
    5. thanks Nerys, I'm glad you all know this reference!

      Delete
  3. Reeder's apparent age may be as misleading as his apparent inoffensiveness. He actually is "a ...senior civil servant", who chooses to present himself as "dull and dusty" when he is actually lethal and bloodthirsty. Ss I said, the most important aspect of his clothes is: how does he conceal the varied and lethal armoury he carries in them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed you did, and he has a lot packed away in his frock coat. Of course his umbrella hides a sword-point-style object, but there's still a lot to be packed away in his pockets. It must spoil the line...

      Delete
    2. Shades of that tight-fitting dress in Murder at the Vicarage. Wouldn't any bad guys at the theatre be suspicious of strange lumps in Mr Reeder's clothes? Like the cliche of the gangster with the sinister bulge in his jacket.

      Delete
    3. Easier to hide in mens' formal clothes than in that notorious light summer dress!
      Perhaps his clever tailor has ways of smoothing out the bumps 😉

      Delete
  4. There are Reeder novels but they are variable. One is a real melodrama involving tunnels in a cliff that emerge thru a cupboard in a manor house. Margaret swims to safety along many miles of coast and... I won't spoil it for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will definitely have to find that the next time I have a need for Reeder...

      Delete
  5. It's interesting that Wallace would be better at short stories than novels, Moira. I actually think many writers are better at one or the other. As I was reading your post, I was thinking of Mr. Parker Pyne, so I nodded my head when you mentioned him. I do see some similarities. There may not be very much about clothes in this collection, but I could clearly see that outfit you described at the beginning of your post. Wallace could write vivid descriptions, in my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Margot, and yes I am always intrigued by the question of who is better at short stories and who at novels - it seems to me quite a useful distinction

      Delete
  6. What strikes me is that Mr Wallace actually divorced his first wife to marry his secretary about this time. Just had to cut off his side whiskers and prove himself an action hero.
    Chris Wallace

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great perception!
      Are you related?

      Delete
    2. No, he adopted Wallace as his surname I believe. I have a biography but can’t get at it at the moment. Very interesting life. An illegitimate child, he treated illegitimacy unusually for the time. Reared in poor circumstances, he loved life in a big way.
      Chris Wallace

      Delete
    3. He does sound like a fascinating character, and one who achieved a lot

      Delete
  7. I'm aware that Love blossoms any-old-where, and for all I know Mr Reeder is dev'lishly attractive. But yes, I am one of Those Readers. I might not stop reading a book if I came across a May/September-or-later romance, but I'd definitely groan and say "Not again!" because it's one of the hoariest of cliches, and is still going strong. Not to mention the potential Ick factor. It annoys me at least as much as my attitude annoys CiB. (And somehow the May party is almost always female, or if male then the romance will probably fail.) The reasoning that "it's only a story" doesn't convince me because that could be said of any aspect of a book, such as racism or "casual anti-Semiticism" or cruelty. As a reader, I have every right to object to something that's distasteful to me, as long as I don't try to ban a book or otherwise force my opinions on other readers. End of rant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, all (almost all) views welcome here, and people can of course read what they want.
      But - more of a cliche than all the other romantic tropes?
      And I just don't think it's intrinsically wrong. Of course it's wrong if there are power/control issues, but isn't it insulting to women to say that they are not able to make their own decisions and choose their true loves?
      I think arranged marriages for the aristocracy/royals weren't a great idea - but they happened, and sometimes they were successful, and it doesn't offend me to read about them....

      Delete

Post a Comment