Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke
published 2026
In my recent piece for the i newspaper on a new
Netflix series
Little
House on the Prairie: Laura had me at the hat
I mentioned the concept of the tradwife – an online
definition is as follows:
The tradwife movement is a social media-driven
subculture where women embrace traditional gender roles, focusing on
homemaking, child-rearing, and supporting their husbands, often sparking debate
over feminism, gender equality, and political ideology.
Yesteryear is the current book
of the tradwife, a novel looking at the whole idea in an unusual manner. It’s
been a huge bestseller in the US, where it is set, and provoked endless
discussions.
The chief character, Natalie, is a top influencer, with
millions of followers checking into her Instagram account. She lives on a farm/ranch
in Idaho, following a Christian and simple lifestyle, home-schooling her many
children, making a ton of money.
We know straightaway that much of this is faked: Natalie
has huge amounts of paid help, and a very shaky relationship with her husband
Caleb, who is being a cowboy.
Next thing, she wakes up one morning and she is apparently stuck
in pioneer times, 1855, living the life she has chosen to emulate. Naturally
this is not good news at all: life is dirty, exhausting, difficult – and she
doesn’t understand what she’s doing there. Is it time travel, a dream, a
reality show, a message from God?
The novel proceeds with alternate sections telling the
story of what led her to the ranch, and then the story of her trying to adapt
to olden times, work out what is going on, find out what happened to her.
The book starts wonderfully well: it was funny, bitchy and thought-provoking. Natalie is a woman on the make, selfish and whole-hearted and clever – her view of the world is hilarious. There is absolutely no fake sisterhood in her story, she brings a cold eye to other women. Honestly, it made a change. (I’ve said before how much I like a Becky Sharp scenario). For example her judgement on her college roommate: ‘It was clear Reena was dreading not just the internship but the rest of her own life.’
She comes from a very Christian single-parent family, and
makes it out of her community to Harvard. There she meets Caleb, who is part of
a very wealthy political family, with a father with presidential ambitions. They
marry, and have the first baby.
Natalie is increasingly uneasy about her husband’s lack of
ambition….and he is an awful fellow, but still the author and Natalie have room
to consider why he is like that. He hates gong to his parents’ house: ‘I could
practically see Caleb wilting… he looked like a houseplant getting tortured
with a hair dryer’.
The ranch is their way out, and the description of how
Natalie starts her social media presence is very interesting. Her private
thoughts behind her soulful smile are hilarious, and her attitude to her
children is both shocking and kind of refreshing. She is an awful person, but
her honesty and straightforwardness are still appealing. There is a lot of
discussion of ‘likeability’ and ‘relatability’ in the context of social media
world, just exactly as there is in the world of novels. Natalie is not
relatable or likeable at all, looked at through most lenses, but I loved
reading about her. (Pretty much none of the other characters pass the likeable
test either.) Some readers have hated that aspect of her – the book is
divisive.
In truth I had heard about this book, and was expecting
something quite different: I thought it would be a slapstick time-travel book
where this woman realizes the truth of a lifestyle she claimed to want, and
learns her lesson. But that is a wildly over-simplistic view, and not what the
book is about – and although very funny at times it was not the light-hearted
laugh riot I was expecting.
The first third I found wholly compelling, and at times I
was reminded of Curtis
Sittenfeld (a huge compliment from me), though I thought it trailed off
somewhat after that, and could have done with sharper editing. The ending, with
some explanation of what has been going on, didn’t seem very well-worked out, I
thought she needed to have another pass at it. Thinking about it afterwards
there were endless objections and impossibilities. And there’s a rather trite
comment from Natalie’s mother which seems to be trying to make an overarching
point but is completely inadequate to the situation and to Natalie’s problems. (Though
the mother is one of the few likeable characters in the book).
My #spoilernotspoiler system is going to come
into play here: the book has an unlikely strand similar to one in this
post.
But don’t look if you don’t want to know… (it’s not given away in the post, but
if you know the book well you would be able to guess something about Yesteryear).
There was also a strange echo of a recent long-running blog
discussion on the trend between the wars for people to move to the country to try
out eg chicken farming to try to make money Here
with links and comments, and
here with a relevant Punch cartoon. The SPOILER-not-really there is that it
will never work, exactly as in Yesteryear.
As stated above, there are endless discussions online about
what the book means, and who is to blame for what. Readers even look for clues
in the listing for the book. (‘it is not categorized as X, so therefore….’) It
certainly has provoked discussion about tradwives, fundamentalism, parenting,
social media…
What about Little House on the Prairie? The Old Time-y
sections did remind me of LHOTP, and actually showed the dark side of pioneer
times – Burke does not hold back on, for example, just how horrible it is to
wash everything by hand. I’m not sure there’s much else to say about any
comparison: tradwife is an idea that modern women choose, while Carrie Ingalls
had no real choices about her lifestyle, but did not become a tradwife by most
standards.
My final verdict is that Yesteryear was very entertaining
and thought-provoking, an astonishing debut, and wholly original. I can quite
see why it has been snapped up for a major Hollywood film.
Where else to look for pictures than in the
Old
Ralph Lauren Adverts: Archive
- Mr Lauren famed and loved for his prairie looks
The picture of the settlers with wolf and ax/e does not directly reflect anything from the book, yet somehow seemed the one to choose. NYPL 1859
Deadly
attack of a wolf upon a man, and heroic conduct of the man's wife - NYPL
Digital Collections
Online discussions of LHOTP get very tied up with the
role of wolves in frontier life.







It does seem a very different sort of book, Moira. I find it interesting to have that tradwife phenomenon explored, and I think it's clever to 'pull back the curtains on it' like this. And of course, I always enjoy some wit in a story (and I do like Becky Sharp...). Hmm..... Quite an interesting take on this sort of life, and I can see why you found it entertaining and thought-provoking at the same time.
ReplyDeleteI can understand that it is not for everyone, and it's not perfect, but I found a lot to like
DeleteWell, indeed, I was agog to get it from my library (which ordered HUNDREDS of copies !!?? in all formats) because, based on what I'd read, I expected it would go in a very satisfactory direction for a misguided but potentially redeemable woman.
ReplyDeleteBut no.
I got it and began to read, and found after a bunch of chapters that Natalie isn't misguided. She's an out and out self-obsessed horror show and I had no interest in any redemption for her. Checking Goodreads reviews, I found I was not alone in my expectations and letdown, so that was that.
But hey, I think I'll check into Curtis Sittenfeld now, who I have, until recently, assumed to be a male-type athlete. (Though maybe not Eligible.)
Oh well - different books for different people! Natalie was an awful woman, but I thought the character was well-constructed and there were some very interesting ideas and moments.
DeleteCurtis Sittenfeld I think is a marvellous writer - her books are very varied. I very much liked American Wife, and her recent book Romantic Comedy is very different and very entertaining
This is such a great idea - and very timely. Hasn't there been something in the news recently about a woman whose wonderful online family turned out to be a sham and she was actually abusing her children. Not read anything by Curtis Sittenfield, so she in on my radar now. Though, surely, yes, Curtis is a male name ... Chrissie
ReplyDeleteI think there's been a few cases like that, and it's hardly surprising. I thought this was a clever and interesting response to this specific current world - though others do not feel the same.
DeleteCurtis S is a marvellous writer, you should definitely try her. And in the US there are very few first names that are strictly male or female! I have lists of my children's classmates' names in the USA 25 yers ago, and you would have a hard time dividing them by gender. Names like 'Taylor' were evenly divided....
The tradwife "choice" is full of irony, given that not-so-long-ago there wouldn't have been much possibility of any choice (as noted about Ma Ingalls). It's not a new subculture, some religious groups have never really given up traditional gender roles, or even supported equal rights for women. I'm fine with women wanting to live that kind of life as long as they don't try to force it onto other women--which, they often try to do, unfortunately. And the fact that they can "choose" a way of life is due to the efforts of the feminists they apparently despise....
ReplyDeletethere is also the concern that some women are not choosing this, but having it pushed onto them.
DeleteGood point about the work of feminists in giving us choices
(Anonymous was Marty, again. I'll get the hang of this someday.) I'm wondering how Natalie can be honest and straightforward while she's hoodwinking her followers with a phony image of herself. Now if she shared her true feelings with them, that would be straightforward!
ReplyDeleteshe is honest to herself about her own motives - not 100% but most of the time. She wants to achieve certain things and does the best she can, but she does not tell herself that she is doing this for other people, or for her children, or for the good of mankind. Obviously she isn't being straightforward with her followers. She is honest (in the text) about the fact that on the whole she despises them...
DeleteIt sounds intriguing, and I'm going to look for it at the library. A friend of mine is very 'trad' and always has been, I think maybe influenced by her mother. For instance, she was appalled that her son was going to have to do some grocery shopping on the way home, thinking that his wife should have been doing it :-)
ReplyDeleteMothers-in-law often feel their sons aren't getting a good deal from their wives - sometimes without considering modern ways and that things have changed...
DeleteI plan to read this book but not sure how soon... I want to get it at a reasonable price. I have a lot of books I want to purchase between September and the end of December. At one time I thought my husband was interested in Yesteryear also, but not sure about that now.
ReplyDeleteIf and when I read I will come back and read your post and comment again.
It's a very interesting book - and people have very varied reactions to it, it's not for everyone. I probably would have waited to read it except for just having done Little House on the Prairie
DeleteSounds like a broadly similar concept to Outlander, but much more readable, quite clearly.
ReplyDeleteYes, I kept thinking of Outlander, and I certainly liked it better, though I know others will disagree!
DeleteI have just added my name to the Library waiting list. I am number 61 and there are 6 copies in use so very popular.
DeleteMy grandmother believed that it was undignified for any able-bodied adult not to be able to look after themselves properly, if need be. She had 4 daughters and pretty much vetted their boyfriends based on this principle and my brothers were brought up the same way, as were my nephews. It is about practical life skills but more important, perhaps, an attitude of mind...
She sounds a sensible woman - and that's exactly the attitude I'd have. Whom does it help not to be able to do things?
DeleteMy dear late mother-in-law was proud that she had raised her boys to be able to cook and look after themselves - 'nothing fancy mind, but don't be running round after him.'
I forget which post it was, but we had a discussion about wanting to live in a time other than your own--sounds as if this book would be a good antidote to a romanticized view of the past. I suppose Natalie wasn't a person who would care much about "better" values, but did she find any positive aspects in her life in "the good old days"?
ReplyDeleteI think it was probably Amerlia Tait's time travel book for YA, Lily Tripp.
DeleteDo you know, I don't think she found anything positive at all, another way in which this was quite original. It was pretty much unmitigated hardship for her
I wasn’t going to put this one on my list but now I’m curious about the spoilernotspoiler reference …
ReplyDeleteSovay
Aha! I could see the first line before I saw who posted this comment, and I thought 'Oh gosh I hope they are not disappointed if they read a whole book to get a tangential connection'. But then I saw it was you, and I thought 'oh she won't mind....' 😀😀😀
DeleteI was in two minds anyway – and the indications in the comments that there’s no hugging and no learning (was it Seinfeldthat had that rule for its writers?) also piqued my interest. On the other hand the TBRs are through the roof - perhaps literally, if I put them all in a single stack. One for the Library list, rather than Purchase, I think.
DeleteGood to see the two jolly Ralph Lauren girls again (pic 2, left), standing out against the prevailing sulky moodiness – though from the sound of it, the sulky moodiness is appropriate this time round.
Sovay
I very much enjoyed it, am very glad I read it - but it's not one where I'm saying, everyone will love.
DeleteYes, I love my Ralph Lauren girls and their varying moods. I thought the fifth picture down, the couple, really looked like Natalie and Caleb not gettng on, and the top picture was quite surprising, even among moody advertising, because she looks despairing. So - good for the book, though she wouldn't have worn denim dungarees I don't think.