Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke
published 2026
In my recent piece for the i newspaper on a new
Netflix series
Little
House on the Prairie: Laura had me at the hat
I mentioned the concept of the tradwife – an online
definition is as follows:
The tradwife movement is a social media-driven
subculture where women embrace traditional gender roles, focusing on
homemaking, child-rearing, and supporting their husbands, often sparking debate
over feminism, gender equality, and political ideology.
Yesteryear is the current book
of the tradwife, a novel looking at the whole idea in an unusual manner. It’s
been a huge bestseller in the US, where it is set, and provoked endless
discussions.
The chief character, Natalie, is a top influencer, with
millions of followers checking into her Instagram account. She lives on a farm/ranch
in Idaho, following a Christian and simple lifestyle, home-schooling her many
children, making a ton of money.
We know straightaway that much of this is faked: Natalie
has huge amounts of paid help, and a very shaky relationship with her husband
Caleb, who is being a cowboy.
Next thing, she wakes up one morning and she is apparently stuck
in pioneer times, 1855, living the life she has chosen to emulate. Naturally
this is not good news at all: life is dirty, exhausting, difficult – and she
doesn’t understand what she’s doing there. Is it time travel, a dream, a
reality show, a message from God?
The novel proceeds with alternate sections telling the
story of what led her to the ranch, and then the story of her trying to adapt
to olden times, work out what is going on, find out what happened to her.
The book starts wonderfully well: it was funny, bitchy and thought-provoking. Natalie is a woman on the make, selfish and whole-hearted and clever – her view of the world is hilarious. There is absolutely no fake sisterhood in her story, she brings a cold eye to other women. Honestly, it made a change. (I’ve said before how much I like a Becky Sharp scenario). For example her judgement on her college roommate: ‘It was clear Reena was dreading not just the internship but the rest of her own life.’
She comes from a very Christian single-parent family, and
makes it out of her community to Harvard. There she meets Caleb, who is part of
a very wealthy political family, with a father with presidential ambitions. They
marry, and have the first baby.
Natalie is increasingly uneasy about her husband’s lack of
ambition….and he is an awful fellow, but still the author and Natalie have room
to consider why he is like that. He hates gong to his parents’ house: ‘I could
practically see Caleb wilting… he looked like a houseplant getting tortured
with a hair dryer’.
The ranch is their way out, and the description of how
Natalie starts her social media presence is very interesting. Her private
thoughts behind her soulful smile are hilarious, and her attitude to her
children is both shocking and kind of refreshing. She is an awful person, but
her honesty and straightforwardness are still appealing. There is a lot of
discussion of ‘likeability’ and ‘relatability’ in the context of social media
world, just exactly as there is in the world of novels. Natalie is not
relatable or likeable at all, looked at through most lenses, but I loved
reading about her. (Pretty much none of the other characters pass the likeable
test either.) Some readers have hated that aspect of her – the book is
divisive.
In truth I had heard about this book, and was expecting
something quite different: I thought it would be a slapstick time-travel book
where this woman realizes the truth of a lifestyle she claimed to want, and
learns her lesson. But that is a wildly over-simplistic view, and not what the
book is about – and although very funny at times it was not the light-hearted
laugh riot I was expecting.
The first third I found wholly compelling, and at times I
was reminded of Curtis
Sittenfeld (a huge compliment from me), though I thought it trailed off
somewhat after that, and could have done with sharper editing. The ending, with
some explanation of what has been going on, didn’t seem very well-worked out, I
thought she needed to have another pass at it. Thinking about it afterwards
there were endless objections and impossibilities. And there’s a rather trite
comment from Natalie’s mother which seems to be trying to make an overarching
point but is completely inadequate to the situation and to Natalie’s problems. (Though
the mother is one of the few likeable characters in the book).
My #spoilernotspoiler system is going to come
into play here: the book has an unlikely strand similar to one in this
post.
But don’t look if you don’t want to know… (it’s not given away in the post, but
if you know the book well you would be able to guess something about Yesteryear).
There was also a strange echo of a recent long-running blog
discussion on the trend between the wars for people to move to the country to try
out eg chicken farming to try to make money Here
with links and comments, and
here with a relevant Punch cartoon. The SPOILER-not-really there is that it
will never work, exactly as in Yesteryear.
As stated above, there are endless discussions online about
what the book means, and who is to blame for what. Readers even look for clues
in the listing for the book. (‘it is not categorized as X, so therefore….’) It
certainly has provoked discussion about tradwives, fundamentalism, parenting,
social media…
What about Little House on the Prairie? The Old Time-y
sections did remind me of LHOTP, and actually showed the dark side of pioneer
times – Burke does not hold back on, for example, just how horrible it is to
wash everything by hand. I’m not sure there’s much else to say about any
comparison: tradwife is an idea that modern women choose, while Carrie Ingalls
had no real choices about her lifestyle, but did not become a tradwife by most
standards.
My final verdict is that Yesteryear was very entertaining
and thought-provoking, an astonishing debut, and wholly original. I can quite
see why it has been snapped up for a major Hollywood film.
Where else to look for pictures than in the
Old
Ralph Lauren Adverts: Archive
- Mr Lauren famed and loved for his prairie looks
The picture of the settlers with wolf and ax/e does not directly reflect anything from the book, yet somehow seemed the one to choose. NYPL 1859
Deadly
attack of a wolf upon a man, and heroic conduct of the man's wife - NYPL
Digital Collections
Online discussions of LHOTP get very tied up with the
role of wolves in frontier life.







Comments
Post a Comment