Dressing for the ball - NYPL Digital Collections
Clothes in Books roams
all over the place – nearly always books, often clothes, but I never feel
constrained by the name. (Compass
directions anyone? – two
posts and more comments than any other topic ever)
But – one of the key purposes of the blog is to discuss clothes
with examples and illustrations from books.
Today we are going after crinolines, in the full hope that
many of my readers will enjoy, and have something to add…
A forgotten book I am very fond of is Arnold Bennett’s The
Old Wives’ Tale (one of the first posts on the blog, to be followed by several
more on the same book). The author wanted to show how young women
become old wives, but he also said he was fascinated to have overheard a
comment from a woman who had lived through a busy time of history, including
the Paris Commune and siege, apparently without noticing much. He put it straight
into the book:
Sophia…noticed how much easier it was for
attired women to sit in a carriage now that crinolines had gone. That was the
sole impression made upon her by this glimpse of the last fete of the
Napoleonic Empire.
Crinolines feature a lot in the book – they arrive at the
beginning and are gone at the end. Early on, Aunt Harriet climbing into a small
carriage is described as being “an operation like threading a needle with
cotton too thick.” But once in, “her hoops distended in sudden release, filling
the waggonette.”
The underpinning that we call a crinoline arrived in the
mid1850s – the metal hoops were patented then though the silhouette already
existed - and lasted well into the 1870s,
though changing its shape along the way.
Anthony Trollope’s
novels cover a long period, but he is very prolific in peak crinoline time, and
apparently did not like them.
The very distinguished artist John Everett Millais
illustrated many of his books, and the only time Trollope was less than happy
was this one – Lucy being very upset in Framley
Parsonage, throwing herself on her bed to cry. He considered that the very exaggerated skirt
dominated the picture, because of the crinoline, and that Lucy looked as though
she was sleeping rather than weeping dramatically.
In The
Small House at Allington, the
crinoline acts as a barricade:
Cradell looked half afraid of
his fortunes as he took the proffered seat; but he did take it, and was soon
secured from any positive physical attack by the strength and breadth of Miss
Roper’s crinoline.
In his The Three Clerks, one of the young men has
invented a Lady Crinoline (honestly, not worth pursuing). In Rachel Ray
we see them at the beginning of a small dance:
Now the room was partially
cleared, the non-dancers being pressed back into a border round the walls, and
the music began. Rachel, with her heart in her mouth, was claimed by her
partner…she would have preferred to be left in obscurity behind the wall of
crinoline.
A Trollope biographer, Victoria Glendinning, says
the author was conflicted – he was quite rude about them, but she thinks he
also found them ‘exciting’ in certain circumstances (and on younger
good-looking women).
I did a post on crinolines last year, brought on by Sylvia
Townsend Warner’s The Flint Anchor – written in the 1950s but set
100 years earlier and carefully researched:
Women had begun to wear crinolines, and Mary prided herself on having the most imposing crinoline in Loseby. Every year more yards of silk and velvet were required to drape the structure, and a more elaborate system of flounces and outworks was festooned about it. With her stiffly corseted body, her necklaces, bracelets, and earrings, she seemed to be an idol rising from some peculiar dome-shaped altar, and looking calmly and negligently down on the offerings that had been laid around her...
Gwen
Raverat’s Period Piece is a gorgeous book and a fine resource
for fashion info. There is this
I once asked Aunt Etty what it
had been like to wear a crinoline. “Oh it was delightful” she said, “I’ve never
been so comfortable since they went out. It kept your petticoats away from your
legs, and made walking so light and easy.”
In a recent comment section we were talking about people writing
about experiences they had never had: men and women writing about each other
are a particular feature. Roughly
speaking, men assume that crinolines were ridiculously uncomfortable and
awkward but that doesn’t seem to have been the case. Men also felt that they
got in their – men’s – way and enabled women to take up too much space. We look at that differently
these days.
Punch the comic magazine was apparently obsessed with
crinolines: the attention they paid, and the number of cartoons on the topic, are quite extraordinary. The men of Punch just couldn’t get over the idea of crinolines…
Jerome K Jerome has a ‘funny’ story in his collection Evergreens,
about a dog getting trapped inside his aunt’s crinoline. It’s obviously meant
to be a tall story and amusing, but it doesn’t make the slightest sense. The
conclusion would be that JKJ had no idea what a crinoline really consisted of,
or how it operated. Or – of course – what it was like to wear one.
My aunt thinks that it--the
crinoline--must have got caught up in something, and an opening thus left
between it and the ground. However this may be, certain it is that an absurdly
large and powerful bull-dog, who was fooling round about there at the time,
managed, somehow or other, to squirm in under my aunt's crinoline, and
effectually imprison himself beneath it.
Great hilarity ensues, but I don’t think so.
How to wear them: I recently mentioned Irene Thomas,
in relation to astrakhan
collars, and she also came up with helpful
input into keeping your tights up on stage – a topic that gave us one of our
most popular blogposts a good many years ago.
And now we will bring in this fascinating insight from her
days in the chorus of the Royal Opera House:
[Verdi opera] La Traviata
is a great favourite with choruses, it’s one of the few operas where no
designer can make you look awful, because all the women are supposed to be
high-class Parisian tarts, and all the men rich and sophisticated…
The girls were taught how to
walk in the vast crinolines of the 1860s. I wince now whenever I see an actress
lift the skirt by one of the hoops…. The proper way is to press the hoop
inwards towards your knees and glide.
In Dodie Smith’s I Capture The Castle (which I mentioned
recently as an almost-perfect book, and is in general all over the
blog) Rose needs a new dress for an evening out. Family friend Miss Marcy has
an idea:
‘It should be pink,’ she said,
‘a crinoline effect – there’s the very thing here in this week’s Home Chat.’
She dived into her satchel for it.
‘Oh, dear, that would be
perfect for her,’ sighed Topaz.
The two women are conspiring to find a good match for Rose
and know that an old-fashioned look will suit her.
Rose had a real crinoline to
wear under the dress; only a small one but it made all the difference. We
borrowed it from Mr Stebbins’s grandmother, who is ninety-two. When the dress
was finished, he brought her over to see Rose in it and she told us she had
worn the crinoline at her wedding in Godsend Church, when she was sixteen.
I thought of Waller’s ‘Go, lovely Rose’ –
How small a part of time they share
That are so wondrous sweet and fair!
– though I refrained from mentioning it; the poor old lady was crying
enough without that. But she said she had enjoyed the outing.
[After the big night]
I saw Rose going along the
lane with Mrs Stebbins’s crinoline: Stephen had brought word that the old lady
was fretting for it... Rose had it over her shoulder; she did look peculiar.
The book, first published in the 1949, is set in the 1930s. If we guessed at 1934, that would mean Mrs S was born in 1842 and married in 1858 – exactly correct for the crinoline.
There's probably a lot more to say on this topic, and I am relying on some reader input, and I still have oa few more examples ready...
Rose in her pink dress – an illo from 1921 NYPL






They must have been comfortable if they kept all the material away from the legs. It's noticeable today that very young women, by which I mean secondary school aged teenagers, absolutely loathe the feel of material flapping around their legs - hence the very short skirts that barely clear the bum area and the skin tight legging type trousers. It's only as people get older that they choose to wear the baggy or loose styles of trouser, or long skirts.
ReplyDeleteThat's a fascinating theory Ann! Hard to argue, though it's never occurred to me before.
DeleteWith my Socialist hat on, I would assume crinolines were very much a class/status thing. Only the rich would have been able to afford the frame and the many yards of fabric and trimming required to cover it. And you would need servants to clean the skirts. Poor, working women would not have had the money, and in any case, crinolines would have been thoroughly impractical for them. When crinolines were most popular, there was a lot of new money about and newly rich industrialists were keen to flaunt their wealth and establish their position in society, distancing themselves from those “beneath’ them.
ReplyDeleteThere's a claim that crinolines existed throughout society, all classes - I suppose some of them trickeled down, donated by the poshos.
DeleteCertainly the criminal classes liked them because crinolines could be used to advantage in both smuggling and stealing/shoplifting
Not necessarily. The crinoline was one of the first truly open to all fashions. There were studies made at the time to survey people's possessions and almost every woman, even poor women, in the Westernised world, had at least one hoop in their wardrobe, even if they just wore it for Sunday best. There are photos of Australian expat working women living in slab huts wearing their Sunday best - crinoline and all - for the photo.
DeleteThis was part of the problem, because the universality of the crinoline meant that you had servants defying their mistresses by wearing a hoop, and if Madam tried to prevent it, the maids quit and went elsewhere and Madam couldn't employ new servants because they refused to have their dress policed. Factory workers wore them, which led to some really nasty accidents. If anything, the crinoline was hated by men because it forced them to contemplate a world in which women could crowd them out and exclude them by taking up space enough for five men. That's why Punch was so obsessed with making fun of crinolinemania, it was fuelled by misogyny and fear that their masculinities would drop off if women continued taking up so much space.
The narrative that crinolines (or any kind of nice clothing/possessions) are/were only for the wealthy and superior classes is anti-socialist propaganda. A modern day equivalent would be saying that benefits claimants shouldn't have mobile phones or flat screen TVs or even soft furnishings.
Thank you Daniel, a very thorough look at the situation, and very much as I suspected.
DeleteI haven't read the books, but I remember an episode of Cranford in which ladies want to order a birdcage and the young lady of the manor, hearing that they want a cage, orders them a crinoline. And they rig it up into a very large birdcage.
ReplyDeleteThe Cage at Cranford. The chronology doesn't fit in at all because I think Cranford is supposed to be set in the 1840s so the existence of the cage itself is rather anachronistic, but it's a fun story
DeleteThanks both, nice story. As Daniel says (implies) the history of crinolines is very specfic and very well-documented, and the timeline is clear.
DeleteI think Cage at Cranford was written as a short story some time after the original books.
DeleteThat's interesting about Trollope. I must confess that I still can't think of the huge crinolines as a good thing, although Aunt Etty's remarks make sense. They bring to mind Mother Ginger in the Nutcracker, although sometimes panniers are used I guess. Surely panniers are cousins to crinolines? They both seem too bulky to me.
ReplyDeletePanniers are 18th century and mainly side hoops. They and crinolines are both descended from the Tudor/Renaissance period farthingale, which itself originates from a hooped/corded conical petticoat called the verguada. While it was popularly believed for a while that Ancient Minoan women wore a sort of hooped skirt due to the bell shaped silhouette of the famous figurines, this is no longer taken seriously.
DeleteI love the idea of us all walking round like Mother Ginger!
Deletethere have been frequent fashions for dresses that change the wearer's shape. The point about the crinoline was that in 1856 someone patented a lightweight steel hoop structure, and that changed the whole experience: no longer heavy chunks of material with horsehair padding to make a shape. Crinolines gave you the shape but were easy(ish) to wear
Verdugado is the correct spelling
DeleteThanks again Daniel for sharing your expertise!
DeleteThis website goes into the "Crinoline paradox" in some detail: https://pastfashionsite.wordpress.com/2017/11/21/crinoline-the-paradox-of-the-cage-part-1/
ReplyDeleteNice details, and full history of shape-changing going back a long way.
DeleteAnother site with old photos, some mocking, emphasizing the dangerous side of crinolines: https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/crinoline-historical-photos/
ReplyDeleteYes there are a lot of such pictures and I would suggest that nearly all of them were staged for the photographers!
DeleteOne of the best images of servants in crinoline: it was such an issue that lots of housekeeping manuals and advice specifically addressed the question of what to do with servants who insisted on dressing fashionably.
ReplyDeletehttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Finnie._Maids_of_All_Work,_1864-65.jpg
What a lovely picture! Am saving that to my files.
DeleteThe number of 'warnings' that the lower classes would burn to death, couldn't do their work properly etc I am quite certain far exceeded the number of women who did burn to death because of their crinolines...
Unfortunately crinoline fires are pretty well documented in a number of newspaper accounts. Oscar Wilde's two half-sisters died as a result of their dresses catching fire, and one of the worst mass deaths by fire was in Santiago, Chile, in 1863 when between 2000 and 3000 people died in a fire at a church. The fire spread swiftly amongst the women's massed dresses and in the crowds, it was impossible to escape the flames. The event is called Chile's Titanic.
DeleteI think the reports collected from the time suggest that at least 3000 women in the UK alone were killed as a result of dress fires during the crinoline's heyday. Florence Nightingale estimated that there were about 630 fatalities in 1863-64 alone. While there were flame-retardant fabrics available, these weren't considered beautiful so they didn't tend to be worn.
DeleteWould Lucy’s skirt have draped decorously like that if she’d thrown herself dramatically down on her bed wearing a cage crinoline? One of the disadvantages was said to be that if pressure was put on one point on the circumference of the hoop, the opposite side would rise up in the air, revealing whatever was underneath.
ReplyDeleteSovay
I wore a crinoline under a bridesmaid's dress in the 1980s, and I remember this disadvantage! Perhaps 1980s wedding crinolines, and the dresses worn over them, were flimsier than Victorian versions. Looking at the pictures referenced by Marty, it seems that it would be difficult to dress yourself in a very large crinoline. Could this have been a status symbol, telling the world that you could afford a lady's maid?
DeleteNerys
There's a novel by (?) Charlotte M. Yonge that has a character whose legs have been so badly burned that she can't walk - it sounds like a crinoline fire.
ReplyDeleteI once had a cotton maxi dress with a lining, and hated the feeling of it wrapping around my legs as I moved, so can understand the feeling of freedom.