The Origin of Evil by Ellery Queen
published 1951
Someone recommended this book to me, as usual I can’t
remember who.
I have read and blogged on a few EQ books, always jumping
around in the oeuvre, not trying to read them in order. For those in the know
(ie not me) this is a Period 3 book in the list. Curtis Evans (of
course) explains all this in an
excellent post on this book at his Passing Tramp blog.
(Fascinating comments too, though containing spoilers, which the post itself
obviously doesn’t contain).
This one has Ellery Queen (who is both author and protagonist) in Hollywood, writing a novel,
and getting involved in a strange case involving a pair of business partners,
jewellers: they received a mysterious message, and now one is dead and the
other is under threat.
Ellery is pulled into the case by Laurel, the daughter of
the dead man, and Delia, the wife of the survivor. Laurel is young and naïve,
Delia is older and a woman of the world. Their clothes are much-described,
which is part of the reason for my taking on this book. Here is young Laurel:
She was dressed
in zebra-striped culottes and bolero over a bra-like doodad of bright
green suede. Green open-toed sandals on her tiny feet. A matching suede jockey
cap on her cinnamon hair.
A most unlikely outfit and impossible to find, but I liked
this zebra-striped top.
Queen is attracted and repelled by the sexy Delia - top picture:
Delia Priam was big game; one
glance told him that. His doorway framed the most superbly proportioned woman
he had ever seen. She was dressed in a tawny peasant blouse of some sheer
material and a California print skirt of bold colours. Her heavy black hair was
massed to one side of her head, sleekly, in the Polynesian fashion;
she wore plain broad hoops of gold in her ears. Head, shoulders, bust, hips —
he could not decide which pleased him more. She stood there not so much in an
attitude as in an atmosphere — an atmosphere of intense repose, watchful and
disquieting.
The picture is from the NYPL
collection, fashion of the 1940s.
Now, when I posted on
The
Mirror Crack’d From Side to Side by Agatha Christie
I said this:
As usual, there are limited but sometimes odd details of
clothes and appearances. One visiting filmstar has Fiji Islander hair – I feel
this was cultural appropriation and perhaps not a real thing.
But maybe it is. This photo is I think shows Rihanna, (who
is of course from Barbados, not Polynesia) but has been perhaps photoshopped,
it is not real.
The story rattles along, with setpiece scenes about eg a
man living up a tree in a loincloth. The threats keep arriving, staged
as physical events: a plague of frogs, a burnt book, some worthless stock
certificates. Everyone tries to work out the meaning behind these clues, and to
track down how they were obtained.
Then there is a massive dump of previously wholly-unknown
information, and then a couple of reversals.
It is completely impossible to believe in anyone’s motives
in this, let alone their ways of accomplishing their objectives, but once you
let that go, it does rattle along.
Ellery Queen is unnecessarily vile about Delia, obviously
because he is having trouble resisting her wiles.
There she was in the doorway.
She had changed to a hostess gown of golden silk which clung as if it loved
her. It was slit to the knee. She was glancing coolly from her
husband to Ellery.
Slit to the knee! That
one was older than the pyramids. And how old was his stupidity? It probably
went back to the primordial slime.
This dress if modern and not a hostess gown, more of a
cheongsam, but I thought it had the look.
On another occasion: She was in brief tight shorts and a
strip of sun halter. Her thighs were long and heavy and swelled to her
trunk; her breasts spilled over the halter.
You don’t have to be Freud to think this is all telling us
more about Ellery Queen than about Delia.
One more feature of this femme fatale:
Seating himself beside her, he took one of her hands. It was cool and secretive.
I think I’m going to aim for secretive hands myself #squadgoals
[Though perhaps I am wrong to mock: in Alistair MacLean's seminal work, Where Eagles Dare, a not-very-good secret agent is caught out after chatting with a German officer in the bar: "She doesn’t know enough not to let people hold her hand when she’s telling lies—as she does most of the time.”’ He released the girl and half-turned her round, smiling down at her. “A delightful hand, my dear—but what a fascinating variation of pulse rates.”]
I also liked Laurel ‘smoking with energy’.
The Korean War unexpectedly intrudes into the book, and two
characters end up joining up.
The man living up a tree has the remarkable name of Crowe MacGowan,
from which I assume you are meant to take Cro-Magnon man. In general names can
be important.
Here is one of my patent #spoilernotspoiler links: there is a key (and
just guessable early on for an odd reason) connection with this
author – but don’t look if you want to read Origin of Evil soon.
Delia possesses a white duvetyne coat – I had to look this
up on Wiki:
Duvetyne, or duvetyn is
a twill fabric with a velvet-like nap on one side.
Duvetyne has a matte finish and its high opacity makes it ideal for blocking
light.
Although it is most commonly used in the motion
picture industry, early sources list duvetyne as a common fabric for dresses,
suits, and coats. By the 1930s, however, it was widely noted for its use in
constructing theatrical cycloramas and theater curtains.
I think that describes most of the Ellery Queen that I have read - including this one, though I had to check that I have a copy to be sure. Chrissie
ReplyDeleteYes - good fun, but they melt into one. Not helped by the fact that the titles are often no help - I don't know why this one is called Origin of Evil, and feel many many others could have the same name.
DeleteGiven that traditional Christianity has a tendency to regard the actions of Eve in the Garden of Eden as the origin of evil, the title seems to fit with EQ's attitude to Delia, though not having read the book I don't know whether that plays out in terms of the story.
DeleteSovay
That's a very interesting theory! You'd have to read the book. (which I'm not necessarily recommending.)
DeleteI'm not quite curious enough to read the book; based on the excerpts it seems to be heading in a similar direction to "Too Many Cooks" by Rex Stout, in terms of who's going to be held morally responsible for the evil-doing (regardless of who actually wielded the knife/gun/whatever).
DeleteSovay
I don't remember it enough to confirm, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised.
DeleteRegarding that title..."The Origin of Evil" is parodying the name of the most famous book by the author who you link to near the end of this post. Manfred Lee wanted to call this book "The Missing Link," which probably would've been a better choice.
DeleteOh how helpful, thank you very much, that makes perfect sense....
DeleteYou know, Moira, I always thought Queen was unnecessarily harsh with Delia, too, and the descriptions rather unkind. I wonder if that was of the times... At any rate, I agree with you that this is one of those books with its own quirky logic. If you're willing to just let the story take you, there's definitely some enjoyment there.
ReplyDeleteYes exactly Margot. And it was very much of its time...
DeleteIf Ellery Queen, in 1951, is getting morally indignant about a skirt slit only as far as the knee, that definitely says more about him than about the wearer! I've read a few of the Ellery Queen books but he and I don't get on; in the last one I tried, some decades ago, he was being so condescending to his father that I lost patience with him.
ReplyDeleteSovay
Yes, I think the question is always how far you can accept the absurdity of the books, and one's toletance varies.
DeleteWait, wait... "a bra-like doodad of bright green suede" Really? I suppose I could look up doodad to see if it's actually a form of halter/bra/underwear thing. But I prefer to believe Ellery (the writers or the POV character) simply didn't know what to call it, and used the word as a variation of whatnot or thingamabob or doohicky.
ReplyDeleteAnd "her breasts spilled over the halter." I doubt it.
Exactly. Being facetious with a young woman, calling it a doodad.
DeleteAnd unable to cope with a mature woman, so using these over-sexualised descriptions.
Is a split skirt more scandalous than a short non-split skirt? Maybe it should be!
ReplyDeleteI think there is definitely a school of thought that that is so!
DeleteI wonder if Miss Silver had a secretive cough in her repertoire?
ReplyDeleteThat gave me a loud, and thus not very secretive, laugh! Brilliant.
DeleteInquiring minds long to know: what is a "California print skirt"? Pictures of the Golden Gate and Alcatraz? Citrus and almond orchards? California poppies, alone or with other flowers and/or butterflies? Images of Hollywood stars? Reproductions of old maps of the West Coast?
ReplyDeleteI'd just envisaged a fairly generic big colourful print, but a quick online search turns up images of 50s or 50s-style skirts featuring most of your suggestions!
DeleteSovay
Searching on 'California print fabric' as Sovay suggests does indeed bring up an astonishing array of images. There are some very niche designs out there...
Deletei'm seeing horizontal bands of poppies or lemons. There was a peasant/Native American/Aztec/fun in the sun look that never caught on over here. Snoods, straw hats, pedal pushers and espadrilles - all at once.
DeleteLovely! In Noel Streafeild's The Painted Garden (1949) a young English girl, visiting California, says this: '[The American girls] seemed to have the grandest and most lovely clothes. Sitting on the beach she had studied visiting girls carefully. They usually arrived in shirts and sort of three-quarter length slacks…'
DeleteShe doesn't mention patterns, but is firm that the American girls expected to look nice and have nice clothes, and that showing-off (that terrible crime in the UK) was positively encouraged.
There's a skirt printed with pine trees growing along the seashore that I might have put in a serious bid for 40-odd years ago. The Golden Gate Bridge one also has a certain je ne sais quoi.
DeleteSovay
I was surprised by how attractive some of them were when I Googled.
DeleteCalifornia definitely had a very specific style, very bold and flamboyant and artisanal. New York may have been the centre of American fashion design, but California had a very real identity - sexy, vibrant, often leisurely, quite relaxed. Hard to explain if you're not familiar with American fashion overall, but if you think of New York fashion at this time as "ladylike and well bred", then California fashion is joyous and girlish and bouncy and with a sense of fun or enjoying ones own allure.
DeleteThat's so interesting - thanks for all the info (as ever) Daniel
DeleteAnd (sorry, hit publish too soon): is Delia "big game" herself, or big game hunter? She sounds much more like predator than prey, from the bits you've quoted!
ReplyDeleteI'm going to suggest that she is 'big game' in this description, but that there is an implication in the phrase that this does not mean 'prey' so much as 'serious opponent'. (I was going to say 'worthy opponent', but worthy doesn't seem to feature at all in any of their interactions). And yes she is shown as predatory.
Delete"Secretive hands" made me laugh! I haven't read any Ellery Queen yet, but he's on my list - it sounds like his books are always a bit bonkers but fun. I love this idea for a blog by the way - I am always interested in the clothes in books. I look forward to reading more of your posts :)
ReplyDeleteThank you for the kind words, and great that you dropped by - look forward to seeing you again.
DeleteEllery Queen has never appealed to me, but I am intrigued to know why a man is living up a tree in a loincloth.
ReplyDeleteWell. Don't get too intrigued. There is some nonsense about him being Atomic World Boy, and then later there is a different explanation. I find it very suspicious that he is able to spy on the young woman from his tree....
DeleteIt all sounds hilarious. I had to google hostess gown; it seems like a type of housecoat as mentioned in Elizabeth Jane Howard and elsewhere, smart, belted and with lapels?
ReplyDeleteI recently discovered the Passing Tramp blog - great!
The hostess gown was smart - suitable for entertaining - but comfortable to wear, not tightly fitted (though could be belted). The big point was that you didn't need to wear a corset underneath (though I suppose you could if you wanted) - that was always the breakpoint for hostess gowns, teagowns, housecoats. there are quite a few of them on the blog, for instance this one: 'she had changed into a hostess gown or whatever you call those getups with the long swishy skirt. This one was fireman red with gold beads on it; the beads & the silk rustled when she walked.’
Delete