More Moray Dalton: The Mystery of the Kneeling Woman

The Mystery of the Kneeling Woman by Moray Dalton

published 1936

(following on from yesterday's post)





In yesterday's post I mentioned a surprise that came with a revelation about a character… that was Moray Dalton’s Death in the Dark. The heroine received a letter from an unknown man, and I said I wondered if this was going to be the romantic interest for Judy, and looked forward to meeting C. Fleming. 'Judy and I were both in for a surprise.'

So – the point is that C Fleming is a schoolboy, one who appeared in an earlier book by Dalton: this one! So I read it next, and am covering them out of order.

Here is the Kneeling Woman:

 


“What do you think we’re going to find under this, Inspector? It might be a clue to hidden treasure.”

The brass represented a woman wearing the voluminous gown and starched ruff of the late sixteenth century. She was kneeling at a fald stool, and her four boys and five girls were ranged decorously in a kneeling row behind her. The name of Eleanor Chapman and the date 1578 were just decipherable in the worn lettering at the foot of the panel.

The Mystery of the Kneeling Woman starts in a very traditional Golden Age manner: a small English village, and the vicar has come to spend the evening with a local nob to play chess and talk about books. Their conversation takes an intriguing turn:

“I am expecting visitors very shortly… I’ve half a mind to tell you more about it, Vicar. Your face is so expressive.”

“You talk in riddles,” said Clare rather stiffly.

“If I confide in you I must first exact a promise that you will neither repeat nor act upon any information I give you.”



Unsurprisingly, all kinds of things follow on from this, and soon there are deaths and investigations.

Christopher Fleming, always known as Toby, is 12 years old. He encounters a dying man in the woods, and hears his final words. He is the son of a widow recently moved to the village. An Inspector comes down from Scotland Yard to investigate. The plot winds its way on, very Golden Age and village-based, before taking some quite surprising turns, and becoming very political. There is also a fairly awful incident where poor Toby is sent for a day of playing with a boy who bullies him at school – he is not able to tell his mother that this is a terrible idea. He is treated very badly, and the day has fierce consequences for several people.


There are poisoned chocolates – always a favourite round here – in a very traditional manner:

There was a brown paper parcel on a side table by the open window. “What’s this? Chocs, by gum.” He had thrown the crumpled brown paper into the fender where it flared up, caught by a falling spark from the grate, before he untied the rose coloured satin ribbon that was wound round the box and lifted the lid, and flicked off the sheet of silver paper.

[Destroying the wrappings always essential, did people really do that so fast?]

There is also an awful story going back to the First World War, and the incidents of the white feathers.

Poor Toby ends up in his house alone overnight, and:

“They came in the night—two of them.” Toby’s face changed and his lips began to quiver as he remembered. “They—they made me tell them what I was going to tell you this morning. They tied something over my eyes, and they did this—” Collier’s eyes hardened as he looked at the angry red sore on the boy’s thumb.

And finally the message from a dying man comes into play…

This is a very intriguing book – you never know where it is going next, and there are some most unexpected turns. Yet again – well done Dean St Press, and thanks to Curtis Evans for the introduction.

Not much in the way of clothes, disappointingly.

The double picture in fact shows a woman with her schoolboy brother, but I thought it would stand in. From Wikimedia Commons.

Kneeling woman is Blanche Killigrew from a church in Devon (obviously not brass) is from Wikimedia Commons: File:BlancheKilligrew TawstockChurch.JPG - Wikimedia Commons

(A while back I did a number of posts on tombs in churches.)

Chess players from the Library of Congress.

The next b/w photo is my idea of how Toby’s mother (the widow) might have looked. It shows the artist Peggy Bacon, from the Smithsonian collection.

Comments

  1. Another one for the search list, maybe. Poor Toby seems to have a hell of a time all round.

    Open fires made it so easy to destroy wrappings and other things with little to no trace in GA literature, whether casually or deliberately. Much harder to dispose of your great-aunt's new and unfavourable will these days ...

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I agree about open fires, but even so - did people instantly destroy all envelopes and wrappers? And could the sender count on that? Seems a tad convenient.
      Poor Toby has a very rough time...

      Delete
    2. Not in "The Mysterious Affair at Styles". They tore them into strips and used them to light fires with - which seems much more likely.

      Delete
    3. Can't remember the book, but Julian Barnes claimed somewhere that his parents tore up their war-time letters to each other and stuffed pouffes with them.

      Delete
    4. I'd have thought it would be like chucking something into a nearby waste-paper basket - quite a natural thing to do, though as Moira suggests, unwise for the chocolate-poisoner to rely on it. Making the document into spills as in "The Mysterious Affair at Styles" seemed less convenient - it's not just a question of tearing into strips but of twisting each strip so that it will stand up in the container (and be rigid enough use without burning oneself) - so it takes time, plus the document is then still around to be discovered.

      Sovay

      Delete
    5. Moira/CiB here on a different device. I LOVE the weird topics that cause debate here! In Styles, it must have been quite substantial paper - parchment.

      Delete
    6. What I'd forgotten about Styles is that the perpetrator can't burn the document - it's been a hot summer day, no fires in the bedrooms - so Plan B (spills) makes sense in this instance. Still not convinced that it could be done "in a moment" though as Poirot suggests.

      Sovay

      Delete
    7. There aren't many places to discuss minutiae of this kind! In the heyday of Livejournal there was a community that went into such issues as whether medieval travellers could take stock cubes on their journey and whether a high-class dressmaker in late nineteenth century London would comment on a client's scars during a fitting (consensus was Yes and No respectively IIRC), but suspect it's been long dormant if not dead.

      Sovay

      Delete
    8. I think you are right that the making of spills couldn't be instant...
      And I love living in an era when you can find other people to discuss these things. Bless the internet, for all its faults....

      Delete
    9. It occurred to me to check the classic poisoned chocolates mystery - "The Poisoned Chocolates Case" itself - "By an extraordinarily lucky chance the wrapper of the box was not thrown into the fire, either by Sir Eustace ... or by Bendix himself ... This was the more fortunate as both men had already tossed the envelopes of their letters into the flames." So as far as Anthony Berkeley was concerned, chocolate-poisoned SHOULD be able to count on instant destruction of the evidence!

      Sovay

      Delete
    10. That's 'chocolate-poisoners' ...

      Delete
    11. Tee hee, Berkeley knows what he wants! Authors really can play God...

      Delete
  2. It sounds as though this one isn't just one sort of novel, Moira. There seems to be a mix of GA, political, psychological, maybe even thriller? That's interesting! I really need to read some of Dalton myself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a very strange mashup altogether Margot, you are exactly right!

      Delete
  3. I have the impression that Toby's mother was one of those VERY-hands-off parents. I suppose that, as a widow needing to support herself and a child, she might be too busy to keep a constant watch on him, but honestly! And isn't she portrayed as a sympathetic character, considering later events? Dickens would have given her the Mrs Jellyby treatment....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed! Dalton tries to make it seem reasonable, in order to create the jeopardy situation, but really there is no excuse. Some of it is just very much of its time - Toby not being able to 'snitch' to his mother about the horrible children - but she seems loving but negligent.

      Delete
    2. I think Dalton was more interested in Toby then his mother. You know he later appears again in the series after the war in a major role as an adult.

      Delete
    3. Wonder why she even bothered to give Toby a parent? An orphan left in the care of unfeeling relatives would be bound to have a bad time of it.

      Delete
    4. Curt: I didn't know he appears again as a grownup. She loved the character plainly.
      Marty: mother needed to be matched up with the eligible policeman...

      Delete
  4. Oh, dear, I've got terribly behind with your posts! OTOH that gave me the pleasure of reading several at one go. In the post on Orley Farm you mentioned books about Irish girls going to Spain as governesses: could you pass on some titles? I have long thought that, given the number of minor-character Mademoiselles and Frauleins who educate children in English books, it seems odd that we don't get the adventures of the English girls who go as "Miss" to Continental families. But perhaps we do and I just haven't found them!





    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely if the box of chocolates was nicely wrapped then the victim might save the rose satin ribbon, or decide the box would be useful for storing trinkets, or something? Any potential poisoner would need to be sure their intended victim wasn't a thrifty sort.

      Delete
    2. One that comes to mind is Kate O'Brien's "Mary Lavelle".

      Sovay

      Delete
    3. Also "No More Than Human" by Maura Laverty.

      Sovay again

      Delete
    4. Moira/CiB here:
      Susanna - yes, exactly, the sender surely can't count on recipient's actions?
      Dame Eleanor - they are exactly the titles I would've mentioned!
      So - Sovay, thank you

      Delete
  5. More political than other Moray Dalton books I have read. I did not find it made it better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I agree with you - it was unexpected, and didn't altogether work, following on from the very GA opening

      Delete
    2. That was Moira/CiB - I was travelling and finding it just as hard to comment as everyone else does!

      Delete

Post a Comment