Out for the Kill by Anthony Gilbert
The Woman in Red by Anthony Gilbert
published 1941
This is a frequent occurrence round here: someone in recent weeks recommended
Out for the Kill, and I can’t remember who, or when, or what they said
about it. As ever, I will give credit if you remind me. [ADDED LATER: It was Marty of course! See comments below]
I always enjoy Anthony Gilbert’s books (under whatever name
– for more see this
post and this
one or click on the tag below) without rushing to feel I must read them
all.
I recently read also The Woman in Red, from 20 years
earlier, which I considered to have a good setup but a dull playing out of the
missing-young-woman plot. (The book was turned into a film in 1945 with the
inviting title My Name is Julia Ross).
There are points of interest in comparing the two. Both feature
the series character Arthur Crook – a vulgar, shady but delightful lawyer. This
is his description from The Woman in Red.
A fat, rather common-looking little man was standing in the doorway. He looked as though he’d be more at home on the race course yelling the odds or wearing a stiff white apron, garnished with a knife sharpener on a long steel chain, shouting the bargain prices of meat in some Saturday night market. He wasn’t remotely what any of them thought a lawyer should be like.
And this too is from the earlier book:
Mr. Crook lived very snugly in
Earl’s Court; it suited him to perfection. Mayfair or Belgravia would have been
ridiculous and pretentious; Hempstead and Golders Green were ruled out because
so many of his dubious clients lived there. But about Earl’s Court there is a
sober respectability allied with thrift. This respectability delighted Crook;
he said it tickled his sense of humour. He occupied one floor in one of those
big houses built towards the end of the last century for well-to-do
middle-class families. It had five floors and a steep basement and Crook said
in his irreverent way it reeked of hopeful daughters and discreetly-soured
spinsters.
In the later book:
No 2 Brandon St had lost its delightful air of shabbiness and secrecy that had previously made it such a fitting background for his activities, and was homesick for the blacked-out windows and for the uncarpeted wooden stairs which he had known for 20 years. … An enterprising company had bought the house and turned it into a nest of fashionable modern flats in which Arthur Crook himself was an anachronism.
And in Out for the Kill, Crook gets very involved with other tenants in the house: a middle-aged lady, Miss Chisholm, has apparently disappeared. Vanishing ladies are quite the thing in Gilbert books - both The Woman in Red and The Spinster’s Secret are built on the idea, and there are others. Gilbert is very good at building up a horrible atmosphere in those circumstances, it is one of her talents.
Here he teams up with another tenant, a young woman called Kay, and the in-house handyman, and the astrologer on the ground floor. There’s an unexpected line in TV sales: there’s a young man selling them door to door. He thinks Crook will like ITV, in his business they expect ‘snooty parts of Kensington’ to go for the BBC. ‘None of these phoney quizzes which they couldn’t answer anyway’, but he is clear where he places Crook and his location: commercials and a loud police drama.
That’s a side issue – we’re still chasing Miss Chisholm, who runs a millinery business. She makes and decorates hats, and has strong opinions. The younger Kay is an artist, and tells this story:
‘Miss Chisholm is rather alarming. She banged on my door once and held out an illustration I’d done for a magazine. “No woman of taste, as according to the text this creature is, would wear that kind of hat with that kind of suit.”’
The hats, the shop, the business and the decorations keep
turning up during the story, which makes for good Clothes in Books trails. And there
is even some hat detection (see this
Maigret book for another excellent example of this niche area).
When a hat turns up, Kay (again) knows: ‘There’s certainly
something wrong… they’re all the rage this year… Everything depends on line…
they’re never never trimmed like this.’ Crook tries to argue that Miss C ‘goes
in for decoration in a big way’, but Kay knows better.
So what is going on? I don’t want to spoiler, although this
is very guessable, but I have recently realized that I have covered so many
books on the blog that there is nothing new… so if you want a minor-spoiler clue as to the ins and outs, go
and look at this post for a hint. If not, don’t.
There is a most unlikely suggestion at one point. ‘I
suppose you haven’t heard any orgies at any time Mr Crook?’
‘I wouldn’t notice,’ said Crook regretfully. ‘I’m not nosy
till I’m paid to be.’
The book turns rather thriller-ish in the final third, as
Gilbert had a tendency to do: I preferred the investigating and visiting the
hat shop. But still it was a good read.
There’s an item for Clothes
in Books Furniture Watch (a very occasional series): ‘he sunk onto a rather
womanish-looking divan affair in the living room’. Now what does this either mean
or imply? Is it as obvious as it seems, although it doesn’t seem to fit with
anything else in the book? I looked at a similar coded reference in a much
earlier Georgette
Heyer detective book, but that seemed clearer.
The astrologer, Mrs Sagan, has opinions on hats which I
enjoyed:
'You expect something for your money when you pay her prices, and if you only get a bit of duck’s feather that probably your fishmonger would give you for nothing if you made love to him nicely, or a bit of black net sprinkled with gilded butterflies, well, you do feel cheated.’
I did a blogpost on Celia
Fremlin’s Uncle Paul back in 2018 and it contains this sentence:
And
there is the best use of a hatbox in any book – yes, even better than Anthony
Gilbert’s The
Clock in the Hatbox, recently on the blog, or this early YA book, The
Gates of Bannerdale.
… so there is definite
Gilbert form on hatboxes. This book’s use of the hatbox would come fourth I
think. (Hatbox Watch as a future feature?)
My dear friend Chrissie gave
me a wonderful book from 1957 called How to Make a Hat, and the
illustrations are from there.
I do like the wit in Gilbert's writing, Moira (but of course, you know I have a soft spot for sly wit). And it's so interesting that he depicts the 'hat culture' that used to be such an important part of the world of clothing. His work's observant, too (I must confess I haven't read them all, but...). I'm glad you've reminded me of these books; I really ought to read more of them.
ReplyDeleteYes indeed, and I think you would enjoy them. And yes that's a good way of describing it, hat culture, so all-pervading and so completely gone now! In another book it is made clear that a respectable older lady simply could not go out without wearing a hat.
DeleteI thought you might be interested the University of Wisconsin's Human Ecology digital library (if it isn't already on your radar)? There's a section called "All Sewn Up," with a couple of home millinery books that can be read or downloaded.
ReplyDeletehttps://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AMillineryBooks
thanks Shay, naturally I was completely unaware of this resource, but what a collection of historical sewing books, I have had a quick skim through and bookmarked....Lovely soothing line drawings showing techniques.
DeleteAs it happens, "Out For The Kill" was published as one of the Detective Book Club 3-in-1 Mystery Omnibuses in 1961 for which I have an e-copy (I am online friends with a lovely gentleman who is slowly scanning every issue of these he can get his hands on). Adding this one to my never-shrinking electronic TBR pile.
DeleteThe link is to an online bibliography and not, alas, to the actual copies. https://www.pagesofpages.com/dbc/dbc_1961.html
What an amazing list of contents. Out for the kill is with a book by Kathleen Moore Knight - I have done two of her books on the blog, though not actually this one.
DeleteI think I was the one who mentioned this book to you, in connection with that spoiler post. Something in the book struck me as decidedly lame, and reminded me of the subject. I don't remember the divan and don't know about the coding, I'm never too certain of what a divan looks like anyway! Maybe it resembled a fainting couch? That wouldn't fit Crook very well!
ReplyDeleteThank you! By no means the best book ever, but I was happy to read it. I will add credit above.
DeleteMy vision of a divan is that it is a flat mattress on a simple frame - and that in say the 1930s it was very much associated with women in bedsitters: you slept in it at night, then during the day you put on a nice cover and piled it up with brightly-coloured cushions. Also called a daybed. But whether that is Gilbert's idea I don't know.
The thought of Crook on a fainting couch is splendid!
In this post https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2020/11/bonfire-night-good-night-for-murder.html there is a 1927 picture of Simone Breton sitting on what might be her womanish divan! I love this photo, which is by Man Ray, I must find another reason to use it.
DeleteThis page includes a pic of Freud's divan which looks pretty comfy. When I pulled up images most of them looked like daybeds but there were quite a few that didn't, so I guess I'm not alone in my confusion! https://www.realtor.com/advice/home-improvement/what-is-a-divan/
DeleteWhat an excellent and informative webpage! I was rather taken with some of their examples...
DeleteHaven't read an Arthur Crook story for ages. Must look out for one. And I am delighted to see that you've used the book I gave you. I do regret that wearing hats has gone out of fashion. They are great for bad hair days. Chrissie
ReplyDeletehe is a great character.
DeleteYes, hats are a loss - and for men too. When you see old pictures of eg a sporting event or political meeting outdoors, every single man in the crowd is wearing a hat. gone forever.
And the whole business of tarting up your hats - I remember my mother saying to me (in relation to a hat I wanted to wear to a wedding but wasn't happy with) 'Isn't there one of your friends who could help you alter it?' I looked puzzled, and she explained that in her day there would be always be someone in your group of friends who was 'good with' hats, would have ideas for ribbons and trimmings, would help you change it round. (like Jane Austen girls). I thought that was so nice, and such a lost skill...