Murders in Volume 2 by Elizabeth Daly
published 1941
I recently blogged on Agatha
Christie’s The Clocks: there’s an intriguing page in the book
where Hercule Poirot gives his opinion on crime writers, some real and some
fictional. I suggested then that when he praised ‘Louise O’Malley’ he meant Elizabeth
Daly
‘What a model of fine scholarly writing is
hers, yet what excitement, what mounting apprehension she arouses in her
reader. Those brownstone mansions in New York. Enfin, what is a brownstone
mansion—I have never known? Those exclusive apartments, and soulful snobberies,
and underneath, deep unsuspected seams of crime run their uncharted course. It
could happen so, and it does happen so. She is very good, this Louisa O’Malley,
she is very good indeed.’
So – time for another look at a Daly book: I
always enjoy them and there are a few on the blog. And I, like Poirot, focus on
brownstones, a subject of much
interest and discussion round here
– two Dalys in that post, under the heading Smart Dialogue and a Sour Family.
And yes, that title would work here too.
This one has the most splendid setup, I loved
it. Series sleuth Henry Gamadge, who is an expert in rare books, is consulted by
two members of one of those old NY families who give great plot. Get this: A young
woman, a governess, disappeared mysteriously from their family house 100 years
before. Never seen again, no explanation. And now, she has reappeared, carrying
the book (the volume 2 of the title, Byron’s poems) she was last seen with, on
the centenary anniversary. So this cannot be real – can it? Is it time travel,
a fourth dimension?
As Henry says: ‘I never heard such a story in
my life.’
The patriarch of the family is inclined to
believe in her, but he has form when it comes to weird spiritual beliefs.
The rest of his relatives – the usual random
collection of generations, most of them with no money – are all very bothered
about this. Why, do you think? All together now: ‘They fear he might change his
will’. There is a very successful actress in the family – very good news, theatrical
families hamming it up are always a joy. (See this recently-featured Holly
Roth book also).
Now, Henry G comes up with a dazzling early
bit of clothes detection. He claims that Lydia, the re-appearing young woman,
could walk down the streets of New York in her 1840 clothes, and not look out
of place in 1940. I enjoyed and admire this, while not agreeing for a second. NYPL,
1839, Philadelphia:
‘if you saw a young woman dressed like that on a New York street… would you stop and stare?’
‘No I shouldn’t. If she wore a long skirt, she wouldn’t be wearing a hat, either.’
Which I didn’t understand, still puzzling
over that.
Henry has taken his ideas from Charles
Dickens illos…
....not any more convincing.
To be honest, the second half of the book is less alluring
and less mysterious: it is not a spoiler to say that it becomes clear that
someone in the extended family is up to no good. Then it’s just a question of
whom, and I found this a sad comedown from the original mystery.
But still so enjoyable, with plenty of excellent details.
The girl is described by one character as a
zombi – spelled like that.
An occasional Clothes in Books feature is Furniture
Watch – see
here
for more – and in this book we have several davenports – note our interest
and research here. There is also a chiffonier, which similarly
means something different in UK and US English – here it seems to be a narrow
chest of drawers. We have looked at the chifforobe
in this entry…
There’s a young woman who is mysteriously sometimes called
Rose and sometimes Posy, without anyone ever commenting on this. She also wears
a hat indoors:
…. A shadowy face under a large hat with a pink rose on it, a figured silk dress which reached the lady’s ankles….
Doubly mysterious as we have heard (above) that she wouldn’t be wearing a hat out in the street with her long skirt. (I'm seeing her as the top picture, fashion magazine of the era.) She’s a strange character, odd and intriguing, who could have featured more. Henry works out what is going on in her life via, apparently, sheer intuition. He is forever simply announcing what he has concluded. (No wonder Agatha Christie liked Elizabeth Daly – Miss Marple is much the same)
There is another young woman of interest, particularly for
those of us who have read other books in the series:
A young woman in riding clothes leaned against the car…
A brown riding hat came down low on her dark=brown hair, and a long russet-brown coat hung loosely over dun-coloured breeches and shining brown boots. Miss Dawson’s figure was still rangy; her riding costume became it.
This book is not perfect, and tails off a little, but I still enjoyed it enormously – New York settings in the middle of the 20th century always pull me in.
Woman in riding clothes from Library
of Congress. (There are a lot more excellent sets of riding
clothes in
this post)
This does sound appealing, Moira, even if the ending isn't what you might hope it'd be. I like Gamadge as a character, and, and of course Christie was a fan of Daly's work, so I've always had this weird idea that reading Daly can offer a bit of insight into Christie...
ReplyDeleteYes, Margot, I find it intriguing myself to try to read Daly through Christie's eyes! but definitely a worthwhile read in her own right.
DeleteI really enjoyed this one, too, though I agree that it doesn't really follow through on the splendid set up. But still so much of the stuff we enjoy ... Chrissie
ReplyDeleteYes exactly. Roadhouses in the Home counties, martini bars in Manhattan - comfort and joy wherever we go!
DeleteOoo, it's time to resurrect Credenza Davenport! Does she perhaps have a younger relative by the name of Miss Chiffonier? I think she does. Young and sweet and rosy-cheeked, Petronella Chiffonier, known as Posy to her friends, is like Credenza herself frequently underestimated, which, as we all know, is an invaluable asset to a PI; so when Credenza decides to become a professional sleuth (because she doesn't like the way the academic world is going) she employs Posy, who has a first-class degree in French but doesn't want to teach. I feel more and more that somebody should really start writing this series.
ReplyDeletePerhaps she learned French from their cousin Etagere Garderobe.
DeleteAnd his charming wife, Etui Commode.
DeleteOh you kill me! what a lovely collecton of Furniture Sisters under the Skin, each attached to a certain kind of investigation. My goodness, that would make an excellent Netflix series, each Furniture Girl getting an episode to shine in... the camera lingering just a little on the relevant shiny wooden item in the corner. There was a compactum wardrobe as well - I think Mahoghany Compactum could be their male underling, the brawn amid the brains.
DeleteEver so slightly OT, but I recently came across a writer for the US love pulps of the 30s and 40s named Willametta Turnipseed.
DeleteIt was not a pen name. Presumably she specialized in stories about farmers' daughters?
NO! An amazing name. I looked her up of course - found a few details. Very keen on amateur printing and amateur journalism, though it's hard to understand the importance of amateur status in those areas. Love letters to her fiance, who was killed in the war, but she married another a year later.
DeleteWhat a name.
I can't believe hat Poirot didn't know what a brownstone was! He would have found out (or deduced)
ReplyDeleteHit enter too soon, sorry! Anyway, surely the World's Greatest Detective would have known by this point in his career!
ReplyDeleteMaybe he was just being very continental and teasing! It does sound unlikely, I agree, but you can imagine him also 'not recognizing', say, some very British foodstuff 'what is this porridge?'
DeleteHe could have been displaying some Old World snobbery towards us. Our cuisine certainly wouldn't be up to Poirot's standards!
DeleteBut he didn't like English food either!
DeleteIf she was wearing a (long) evening dress, she wouldn't have been wearing a hat. But an 1840 lady would not go out hatless! Remembering Harriet's seduction outfit in Have His Carcase: a dress that "waved tempestuously about her ankles" and a one-sided picture hat. Late 30s.
ReplyDeleteYes indeed to all. Daly and Gamadge so nearly get there, it's a great idea, but it doesn't add up. It's the kind of inconsistency you would expect in a male author doing his best...
DeleteI forgive her though: most of her clothes and details are splendid.