Friday Fright Night: The Ghost that Never Was…


The fancy dress ball from hell....

Some of the crime bloggers are doing a Friday Fright Night meme for October – masterminded by Curt Evans at The Passing Tramp, and with great work by Kate Jackson at Cross-Examining Crime, and thanks to Bev for the logo.

My previous posts are:

Lord Dunsany

Ghostylocks and the Three John Dickson Carrs

Friday Fright Night of the Demon, also featuring the MR James story Casting the Runes.

This week:




Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier 

first published 1938, and never out of print since. It is being much discussed right now because of the latest adaptation of it.

Rebecca is famously a book named for someone who never appears, narrated by a heroine whose name we never discover. I’d like to add to that: it’s a ghost story with no ghosts…

‘I feel her everywhere. You do too, don’t you?’

It tells the story of a young woman with no family and no money: this is the 1930s. Working as a companion in Monte Carlo, she meets Max de Winter: a rich, sophisticated and mysterious man, widowed less than a year before. He was married to the glamorous and beautiful Rebecca, and lived with her in his beloved family house, Manderley.

He and the heroine get to know each other, and then he suddenly proposes, and takes her back to live in Cornwall. She is shy, young, unsophisticated, unused to money. She feels she cannot live up to the world of the dead Rebecca – she cannot manage the house and the servants, she fears Max is still in love with Rebecca.

Not helping, there is also Mrs Danvers - the housekeeper who knew and loved Rebecca her whole life, and makes it clear that the new Mrs de Winter isn’t a patch…

(Mrs Danvers is one of the great characters of literature, and also an absolute gift for any actress lucky enough to play her: in the latest version, Kristin Scott Thomas blasts everyone else off the set - some kind of miracle in red lipstick.)

Everything is seen through the new Mrs de Winter’s eyes, and she… is haunted. She is obsessed with Rebecca, she feels that Rebecca is still there and won’t leave her alone. She constantly imagines what Rebecca would have done, how she would have reacted, she builds scenarios in her head. There is a bizarre scene where she imagines herself/Rebecca receiving a message at the dinnertable. She thinks of her responses, and then her husband suddenly asks her what she is doing: he describes her motions, her facial expressions, her grimaces. It is a chilling moment. She is possessed.




I have read the book many times, and seen several TV and film versions of it – including the Oscar-winning Alfred Hitchcock film of 1940, with Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine. The most recent one came out on Netflix in the past month, so obviously I watched that too. It has been much criticized, and indeed it very much lacks nuance and tries in a rather crass way to make the new bride much more of a modern, contemporary woman. But the clothes and the settings are beautiful, and if you don’t expect a faithful rendition of the book, you may still find much to enjoy – I did. But NO version of the book is ever complex enough: People compare the current version with the Hitchcock, but the 1940 version (while a great movie) made enormous changes from the book. I understand why they had to do that, but I still think it is NOT Rebecca as DduM wrote it, and does not quite merit all the praised heaped on it.


Anyway, all this sent me to re-read the book, and what a masterpiece it is. I was enthralled all over again. In fact with something as familiar as this it is hard to remember how brilliant the plot is, so perfect, so well-clued, so impossible to guess at first reading. And then the character of the bride is so intriguing, and her travails and sorrows as she starts her married life – the broken ornament, Rebecca’s belongings and even her writing, the fear of Mrs Danvers. The extraordinary fevered scene where Mrs D shows off Rebecca’s clothes. And – of all things – the scene at the fancy dress ball: no young woman can read it and not imagine herself in the unlucky shoes of Mrs de W…. Max behaves appallingly. (Top picture: The Costume Ball by Max Freidrich Rabes)

In lesser hands this would have been a makeover story: Mrs de W would have improved her clothes and her looks, and made a stand with the servants, won the love of Max. And there IS a moment where it seems she will do that. But her future is a lot more complicated than anyone could expect…

So there’s a young girl’s romantic (or is it?) story, an intricate crime plot, and (easily forgotten) a lot of hilarious social satire – the de Winters’ attitude to guests is worthy of Uncle Matthew in the Nancy Mitford books, and there are many witty asides, I was surprised at how often I laughed while reading. For example, everyone latches on to the fact that the new bride ‘does sketching’ and suddenly she is an art expert, and every visitor conversation and discussion comes round to this supposed skill and interest. It’s recognizable and funny. The character of Frank, the kinds of things he says, is very clever – he is minor and unimportant, but we can all imagine him, he is well-realized. Even Max is nicer than you remember. 

But:

‘He knows she sees him, he knows she comes by night and watches him. And she doesn’t come kindly.’

Does the ghost of Rebecca win in the end? – to some extent.

And is it a ghost story?

Rebecca’s boat is called Je Reviens…


Comments

  1. What an excellent choice, Moira! It's a true suspense classic, and a great piece of literature. I'm so glad you mentioned Mrs. Danvers, too. She is a complex, interesting character without whom the book would be so much less, in my opinion. And, yes, lucky is the actress who gets that part.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think one reason it is frequently adapted is that it provides such good parts for a variety of people! But also just because it is a stone-cold classic and will be read forever.

      Delete
  2. Okay, time--past it, rather--for a reread.

    I've always found the 1979 (oh lord, 41 years already??) 4 part series with Jeremy Brett and Joanna David and, um... Anna Massey? the best.

    And, for fun, I'll share with you my miniature room box of the The Library at Manderley.
    http://dalyght.ca/fileshare/library_manderley_oct_2012.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my goodness that is amazing, thank you so much for sharing it! Beautiful! how did you make it? Have you made others, may we see?

      Delete
    2. Oh, thank you, Moira. I do have a weakness for creating miniature scenes, and have done for much of my life. I have 2 posts at my blog featuring Crime Scenes and Detectives.
      You can see them at
      https://dalyght.wordpress.com/2019/10/02/mystery-in-miniature/
      https://dalyght.wordpress.com/2020/03/20/the-scene-of-the-crime-in-miniature/

      Here's a close-up of the recent update of Manderley, with tea and lighting, etc.
      https://dalyght.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/library-pano-1.jpg

      Delete
    3. Susan all I can say is WOW!! They are amazing, I absolutely loved them. I liked Pandora in Blue Jeans tucked away - Grace Metallious and Peyton Place right? Those are amazing. Also - 'I don't think Mrs Danvers will be bothering us any more' - genius.

      Delete
  3. Do you know, Moira, I hesitate to say this, but I haven't read Rebecca! I haven't seen any of the adaptations either. Though somehow I know so much about it, that I almost feel I have.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is surprising, but you will have to read it now. I think you will like it... I think the structure and the way she creates the story are probably of great interest to writers. (As well as just flatout being one of the greats!)

      Delete
  4. If you see it as a love story, the 1940 movie was improved by the Hays code.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In what ways, do you mean? The book has no steamy scenes as far as I can remember.

      Delete
    2. The Hays code meant they had to rewrite the ending, since it also banned depicting characters getting away with crime.

      Delete
    3. Mmm. How innocent do we want people to be? It was a bit too easy, the film ending.... DduM has already let Max off the hook to some extent. I love the ambiguity and the dark side of the book.

      Delete
  5. I agree, the novel is masterful. I revisited it last Christmas (having first read it in my youth), and even after multiple viewings of the Hitchcock film, the original novel still gripped. What I think du Maurier does so well in her fiction is to envelop her central characters in a cloak of ambiguity. She does it here with Rececca and similarly with protagonist in My Cousin Rachel. Our perceptions of the first Mrs de Winter shift somewhat depending on which of the other characters they are refracted through: Maxim, Mrs Danvers or Maxim's sister etc. No wonder the second Mrs Winter is haunted by her presence when there are so competing influences on her imagination...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, great description! And no film will ever quite capture that. It is such a clever book.

      Delete
  6. I think that I have read this but it was long ago. I do plan to read it again. I don't have a copy though so will have to go hunting one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I replied to your other comment first - not letting you off the hook! Rebecca re-read, AND some of her other novels AND short stories...

      Delete
  7. Despite your enthusiasm, I'll pass on the book, but will watch the film if ever the opportunity arises.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that's acceptable! And there are a couple of different versions to choose from. Great datenight or family movie...

      Delete

Post a Comment