Emma by Jane Austen
published 1815
Earlier this year I wrote extensively about Jane Austen
adaptations for the i newspaper – links in
these posts.
Taking my commission very seriously (and enjoying myself hugely) I watched
literally dozens of JA films, TV series, and ‘modern updatings’. And I reread
all her major works to give me a baseline to work from. I am not a purist about
film adaptations (which annoyed some people commenting on my choices) but I
thought it was important to know where they were all, ultimately, coming from.
In the past I always said Emma was my
favourite, and I wondered if that would remain my first choice. And - yes it
did. I was more impressed than ever by the cleverness, the charm, and the
good-heartedness of the book. But there were some differences, reading it in later life.
I still love the casual jokes – the miserable old hypochondriac
Mr Woodhouse asks his friend Mr Perry, the apothecary, if if it might be wiser
NOT to eat the rich wedding cake. Mr Perry says yes, it might not be right for everyone.
There was a strange rumour in
Highbury of all the little Perrys being seen with a slice of Mrs. Weston's
wedding-cake in their hands: but Mr. Woodhouse would never believe it.
When the snow comes at Christmas time
Poor Mr. Woodhouse was silent
from consternation; but every body else had something to say; every body was
either surprized or not surprized.
For forty years that has always popped into my head
whenever a group of people discuss a weather event. As true now as it was 40
years ago, and 200 years ago.
It’s often pointed out that Jane Austen does not do scenes
where only men are talking. But that she thinks about it is always obvious, and
there is this interestingly frank input from Mr Knightley, warning Emma about
the hideous Mr Elton:
'…from his general way of
talking in unreserved moments, when there are only men present, I am convinced
that he does not mean to throw himself away.'
ie he will not be at all interested in Harriet.
Though in some areas Emma has no illusions about her
protegee – when she thinks the acrostic is addressed to Harriet, and it
mentions a ready wit, Emma thinks:
Humph-Harriet's ready wit! All
the better. A man must be very much in love, indeed, to describe her so.
Emma is honest and real:
Why she did not like Jane
Fairfax might be a difficult question to answer; Mr. Knightley had once told
her it was because she saw in her the really accomplished young woman, which
she wanted to be thought herself; and though the accusation had been eagerly
refuted at the time, there were moments of self-examination in which her
conscience could not quite acquit her.
And only Frank Churchill and the Bateses would prefer Jane
Fairfax (cold, serious and willing to enter into an inappropriate engagement)
to Emma.
Mind you, we can all feel for Jane F when people keep
saying the wrong thing, going on and on about her morning walk. Austen does
that so well, they are just being civil and conversational but we feel for Jane
and her journey to the post office, and whenever it seems the conversation must
turn, back it comes again.
There is the bleak cold ruthlessness of the comment when
the truth about Harriet’s parentage is revealed:
The stain of illegitimacy,
unbleached by nobility or wealth, would have been a stain indeed
And the surprising way that Harriet gets back together with
Robert Martin – I can’t be the only reader who had no memory of that curious
incident at all. Astley’s Circus! We might as well be in a Georgette Heyer
book.
And there is always Mrs Elton’s criticism of Emma’s
wedding to enjoy:
‘Very little white satin, very
few lace veils; a most pitiful business!’
I had some new perceptions on this rereading. I think when I was younger I took Emma at her own valuation: lucky, blessed, happy, and:
I always deserve the best treatment, because I never put up with any other
This time round I found her sadder, and lonely, and brave. I realized Emma
is a book about motherless children – Emma, Harriet, Jane. (The men also, but
it is less of an issue, though Frank’s situation is complex). It is glimpsed in
the book in a moving way behind the humour and satire, beautifully done. None
of them has a mother to tell her how to behave. All Jane Austen books - apart from Northanger Abbey - make you wonder a lot about Jane's relations with her own parents.
Is it possible the main characters’ privileged lifestyle is
not popular with the lower classes? Mozart’s opera the Marriage of Figaro, and
the play it was based on, famously showed masters and servants, but was
subversive and suggesting things should change, and that was nearly 30 years
before. It sounds unlikely that Jane Austen is heading for that territory but she
was too smart and thoughtful not ever to think about it. The turkey thieves at
the end of the book (another aspect I had forgotten) are surely a sign that
trouble is coming,
And the book even reminded me of Shakespeare’s King Lear:
perhaps this is over-dramatic, but Emma’s fate if she hadn’t married Mr
Knightley, was not promising, for all she thought having money would be enough.
She could have ended up stuck playing backgammon with her father every night forever,
like Cordelia’s prospect of being locked in a cell with her father:
‘We two alone will sing like
birds i' th' cage….So we'll live,
And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh’
You just have time to think ‘well that’s all very well for
you, mate, you’re old’, when something worse overtakes Cordelia.
Emma got off lightly, even though her living with her husband
and father together is not that attractive a thought.
When I looked at adaptations of the books I mentioned the
description of Emma’s response to Mr K’s proposal:
What did she say?-Just what
she ought, of course. A lady always does
Saying, that’s all very well in a novel, but not going to
work on film.
My favourite version was the 2007 TV serial with Romola
Garai and Jonny Lee Miller. I thought writer Sandy Welch brought out Emma’s
loneliness and Knightley’s awkwardness. Tamsin Greig was wonderful as Miss
Bates, and to hear her drop her voice to a whisper on the word ‘gypsies’ is
worth the price of admission.
The 2020 version with Anya Taylor-Joy is also good, and
definitely draws attention to the thoughtless lifestyles of the rich. It looks
as though it was shot in the Fortnum and Mason’s ice cream parlour, very
aesthetically pleasing.
More on Emma in the blogpost on Sense and Sensibility.
Sitting with her cup of tea – NYPL
fashion collection
Morning walking or carriage clothes - NYPL.
I love this - you are saying several things I have long thought (and in fact, sometimes said or written) myself, such as the fact that it is very much a novel about motherless children. Surely one reason Jane and Frank fell for each other when they met at that seaside resort was their shared Highbury background and the fact that they had both been sent away from their childhood homes and families to live with other people? They somehow share the same forlornness and maybe the same feelings of being outsiders in high society.
ReplyDeleteAnd I also want to stress Emma's admirable courage and good humour. She has a TERRIBLY lonely and boring life: has never been to school, has hardly been out of Highbury, has no mother, no sisters close to her in age, no friends her own age, has nothing to do, and when the only person who functioned as a companion to her leaves Hartfield to marry, what does Emma do? She looks around for another companion and makes do with Harriet because that is what is on offer. She deserves a medal, not blame.
Also, she is not only better than I could ever be with her very trying father, she is also good with children and good to the poor. When I taught this book I sometimes asked my students what Emma would have been today and we usually ended up agreeing that she might have been a social worker or a GP - and a very good one at that: warm, practical and not fussy.
I'm so glad we're on the same page here - and I do love hearing about what you taught in your classes.
DeleteYes I agree with all you say, too - she gets blamed for the wrong things. Her notions of class and social importance are amusing, but her kindness is truly present.
I'd love to hear others' take on the Miss Bates incident. of course Emma offended and upset Miss B, but she didn't burn down an orphanage, and she accepted the criticism and tried to make it right.
I think Emma's relationship with Harriet is more complex than just making do with whoever was available. She doesn't see Harriet as an equal, and has almost a Pygmalion-like attitude towards "improving" and "making a good match" for her. As Mr Knightley points out, Emma's experiment is not in Harriet's best interests. Of course Emma's well-intentioned and much more caring than Henry Higgins, but she's still getting Harriet used to a way of life which Harriet can never really aspire to. Emma's shocked reaction to Harriet's hopes regarding Knightley isn't based just on her own hopes of him, but also on her belief that he's literally out of Harriet's class. But who's responsible for Harriet's "acting above her station" but Emma herself? It's a good thing that Harriet is glad to go back to Mr Martin, or she might have felt she'd been led down the primrose path by Emma.
ReplyDeleteWell.. I think she is misguided - and mistaken about Harriet's background - but she was, as you say, well-intentioned. And between them she and Mr K put it right in the end. Slight diversions on the road to happiness for all of them
Delete