Harlequin House by Margery Sharp

Harlequin House  by Margery Sharp

published 1939

 

 


The unmistakeable hand of Eric Ravilious provided this glorious and perfectly fitting cover


I’m a great admirer of Margery Sharp: so witty, so clever, so clear-sighted. This one had been out of print for 50 years, I believe, when the wonderful Dean St Press republished it. As I say on a regular basis:

And, shoutout as ever to the Dean St Press who have made it available to us and earn my gratitude every week, it seems.

-       I keep the sentence ready to insert in my posts.

Harlequin House is a joy and a comfort read, as all of them are, even if there’s something slightly strange about the structure. The opening and closing revolve round Arthur Partridge, an older chap, a widower, short and round, rather downmarket, and a touch reckless. (He’s a bit like Anthony Gilbert’s Arthur Crook, but not as clever or educated). He is living and working in a seaside town in the south of England. He meets up by chance with an aunt and niece who are staying in the smartest hotel. The niece, Lisbeth, wins the heart of every man she meets (and, surprisingly, not in an annoying way). In a complicated and wholly unconvincing set of circumstances, Lisbeth and Mr Partridge end up in London together: she is meeting up with her brother, who has just come out of prison, and the three of them end up sharing a flat in a grimy part of Paddington. Lisbeth cheers up their rooms:

Lisbeth had also laid out seven shillings on a dozen yards of checked cotton, for tablecloths, curtains and bed-covers; it was red-and-white, blue-and-white, white-and-orange, for she didn’t want, she explained, a colour-scheme, she just wanted colour. The curtains were as yet merely tacked over the windows, the covers as yet unhemmed; but it was abundantly clear that the completed effect would be very colourful indeed.

hence, Harlequin House.

[Boarding houses a very popular subject round here: this is more of a flat, but still counts😊]

You just have to let the opening few chapters go by. Lisbeth has a fiancé, an upright military man who has to go abroad. He needs to be out of the way because he strongly disapproves of the brother Ronnie and would be horrified by the setup in the flat.

The story then dives into the continuing lives of the three of them – who of course have no money. Lisbeth gets a job in an organization of the Universal Aunts style – doing random temporary jobs for the upper classes. She might be babysitting or arranging flowers or meeting a child off a train. (You could just imagine Diana Spencer doing this job before she became the Princess of Wales). The lady who runs the agency has a note on Lisbeth on her books: “Good in emergencies, no male employers.” Mr Partridge reps for a Scottish café on Oxford St, standing outside in a kilt waving a banner.



It was an anxious moment for Mr. Partridge when he first issued from the door of number 7 Marsham Street clad in his Highland regalia. The kilt (or so Lisbeth assured him) was by no means unbecoming; but it felt uncommonly draughty.

Ronnie does nothing, he seems quite irredeemable.

So there are all kinds of adventures, and meeting other people. they all make friends with the people downstairs, a young man turns up.  None of it is exactly surprising, but Sharp was well-named: she tells it very entertainingly, she makes you laugh all the time. The key questions are: What will happen when the fiancé comes home? And Can Ronnie be saved?

It makes for great reading to find out.



Lisbeth stands in as a fortune teller at a ball, wearing a pale dress and a velvet tippet. There are fairground rides in the grounds of the posh house, part of the entertainment, and she has an ecstatic ride on it (picture from the North East Museums)

It was a fantastic and an enchanting sight; for as the horses leapt by in an endless cavalcade the skirts of their lady-riders made waves of silk, of thin muslin, of shining brocade; and the riders themselves, sweeping high through the air, were translated by light and motion into the bright, inhuman creatures of a dream.

 


Not of importance to anyone else much: I have recently been noting whether or not people talk of others’ weight.

Here we have this:

He fixed Mr. Partridge with a stern eye. “Have you any idea,” he demanded fiercely, “how much she weighs?”

“Seven and a half stone,” replied Mr. Partridge.

“What’s that in pounds?”

“How should I know?” demanded Mr. Partridge, with irritation. “She’s not a salmon.”

The original questioner is, of course, American….

Other points of interest: there is a rudimentary Knock Knock joke (“Obadiah’d love to”– apparently they became popular in the 1930s.)

And when first introduced, Lisbeth is dressed for tennis in rather daring pleated shorts. I was going to ignore this, as tennis clothes covered a lot lately, but then I found this picture from a French fashion mag of the right date, with not only pleated shorts, but also a tennis coat, so had to go with it.



“Those shorts!” thought Miss Pickering. They were really quite modest, closely pleated like a fustanella, but they were—well, short.

Fustanella is the very-much-pleated kilt, worn by men in the Balkans, and Greece, so the picture doesn’t really give the full effect.

And, when several people travel up to London by car – this is around midnight, but still – there is this report:

they made good time: at twelve-fifteen they were approaching Hammersmith, a quarter of an hour later they were in Trafalgar Square; and there, for the first time, they stopped.

Hard to imagine nowadays.

And there is a whole side-hustle where all the main character work at drawing ladies’ legs in stockings, and other items of lingerie, to make money: painting them with ‘a good bold line down the calf’.



It is never less than a joy to read a Margery Sharp book.

The man in the kilt is the Scottish entertainer Harry Lauder from the Library of Congress.

The dress – from 1930s Vogue – comes from the Clover Vintage Tumblr.

Comments

  1. Those itty bitty feet in the stocking ad! Artistic license and all that, but still...!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Illustrations always exaggerate! But, for example, some Victorian women had very small feet. At the Bronte Museum you can see their shoes, and they are TINY.

      Delete
    2. Ever see the feet on high-fashion dolls (Barbie, Sindy, Tammy etc)? No mortal being could ever balance on those itty-bitty foundations.

      Delete
    3. As featured in the Barbie film....

      Delete
  2. Christine Harding22 July 2025 at 13:44

    The tennis ladies’ shoes are pretty tiny as well - they all look like the feet of old Sindy and Barbie dolls, balanced on their tippy toes, unable to bear the weight of a real person, so they would topple over if they stood! By the way, were those tennis clothes intended to be worn for playing sport, or watching it? Or was it just a fashionable look?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Thirties ladies don’t have such tiny feet as the ladies of the Regency – check out the wearer of the orange walking dress in the recent “Pride and Prejudice” post!

      “Sports” clothes were fashionable in the Twenties and Thirties, worn by women who didn’t necessarily plan to take any vigorous exercise – the term often seems to be equivalent to casual wear rather than active wear. I should think the woman in the shorts does intend to play though; the woman in the dress is probably a spectator. They’d both need a coat though as classic Golden Age tennis parties never had anything like enough courts for the number of players so involved hours of sitting around chatting whilst waiting to play.

      Sovay

      Delete
    2. People's feet have grown bigger over the generations, and drawings don't have to be honest.........

      Those particular pictures - I think the outfits are for playing. But it's interesting how often tennis outfits in drawings are worn with high heel shoes...

      Delete
    3. I've noticed before that ladies in Regency fashion plates tend to taper down to a point.

      It would be easier to assess the dress - whether designed for playing or watching - without the coat, though my impression is that the skirt's a bit too long and slim for ease of movement on the court. As to shoes, maybe women wore high heels to arrive at the party and changed into something more practical when they were ready to play. Though the shorts-wearer's shoes don't look that much more suitable for any serious running about.

      Sovay

      Delete
    4. When I was a teenager (200 years ago, approx) we read a magazine called Jackie, which had fashion drawings (rather than photos) in those days. The girls had most improbable proportions, of course, but they had rather large feet, because these were the days of platform soles and big round toeboxes. It is my theory (which I have just invented right now) that that is the only time in the history of fashion illos that feet were shown as large....
      The skirt might have hidden pleats. When you see pics of Suzanne Lenglen she always looks like she's going to a cocktail party, but managed to race around the court.

      Delete
    5. There's a really good Posy Simmonds cartoon about the size of women's shoes/the sound they made, juxtaposed with women's rights activism

      Delete
    6. https://www.flickr.com/photos/quant_collection/8658644400/

      I'm sure there's better links out there but seems they're in articles behind pay walls

      Delete
    7. I remember those 1970s fashion drawings – big feet and big hair, long legs and tiny torso!

      There could be pleats in the skirt – impossible to be sure without seeing the pattern. They’d have to start high up though, and as the artist’s done a good job of showing the pleats in the shorts I think they’d have done the same with the skirt, especially if it’s being marketed as an outfit for active play.

      Sovay

      Delete
    8. Fashion drawings are always unrealistic, particularly when it comes to proportions. Apparently there is a rule saying that total human body height is equal to 7-8 times head height. This is never the case with fashion drawings though, regardless of which era they are from, and I'm sure feet are likewise distorted. Having said that - if you wear high heels your feet will look smaller, since they are not stretched out to their full length but "folded". It's an optical illusion but one reason some women persist in wearing high heels every single day of their lives. Yes, I'm one of them and I just checked. My feet are 25cm long - a size 39 in the sizing system I am used to. In my highest heels the actual footprint on the ground is 19cm. This is partly because the heel is curved inwards so that the tip of it is not directly under the end of my foot, but even if measure from the actual end of my foot the result is 23 cm, which would be a size 37.

      Delete
    9. Daniel, that Posy cartoon is brilliant! I love her work. Thanks...
      Sovay & Birgitta: thanks (as always) for valuable input.
      I like your research B - that is a stark explanation of what high heels do!
      Better than foot-binding...

      Delete
    10. I am gratified that you honour my nerdy little trips down rabbit holes with the term "research"! Well, it's hard job, but somebody's gotta do it.

      Delete
    11. Brave work with the tape measure!

      Delete
  3. Any mention of a carousel in books calls to my mind Lydia Keith and her "large farmyard bird" (as referenced in your post on Angela Thirkell's "The Brandons" https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2015/11/dress-down-sunday-brandons-by-angela.html ).

    Fustanella tennis shorts sound pretty but very high maintenance - all those pleats to press after every wearing. The ones in the picture look much more practical.

    I don't think I've ever read anything by Margery Sharp - she doesn't seem to be an author whose books make it to second-hand bookshops - but adding this one to the list.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG yes indeed. Thirkell at her finest. She definitely was up for a double entendre I feel. And Lydia was also never averse to showing off her lovely legs. And I always liked the village called Winter Underclose.

      I think you would LOVE Margery Sharp, Sovay, definitely at least try one! The Nutmeg Tree is my favourite, I think, but all of them are good.

      Delete
    2. Christine Harding23 July 2025 at 09:53

      Thank you everyone for the informative and entertaining comments!

      Delete
    3. Open Library has several Margery Sharp books online. She seemed to specialize in unconventional heroines, Cluny Brown for instance. I hadn't realized that she created the Rescuers series too.

      Delete
    4. Christine - 'Informative and entertaining' is a very good description of the comments.
      Marty - one hopes she made a late fortune out of the Rescuers

      Delete
    5. Skimming through the closing chapters of Sheila Pim’s “Creeping Venom” recently (and discovering that neither she nor I know when Beltane is) reminded me of a puzzling reference to hobby horses at the Brainborough Beltane Fair – as far as I was concerned, a hobby horse is this: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/article/2024/jun/30/australia-hobby-horse-riding-sport-queensland-championships-2024

      But I did work out fairly quickly that in Ireland it must be yet another name for the carousel/merry-go-round/roundabout/gallopers. No waves of silk or muslin or brocade as the glamorous Meriel Booley Brown, the only Brainborough inhabitant likely to provide such, is evidently not a carousel addict.

      Sovay

      Delete
    6. I hadn't noticed that, and wasn't aware of that usage, but I'm sure you are right.

      Delete
    7. A hobby horse can also be a figure in Morris dancing, of various appearances. Wiki has a good bit of information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobby_horse

      Delete
    8. I was convinced one features in that Ngaio Marsh book, Off With His Head, but I'm wrong. (Did feature in Barbie film as mentioned in another comment!) Once you start looking there is a lot of fascinating stuff online.

      Delete
    9. I’d forgotten the Morris horse is also a hobby horse. I’d put money on Gladys Mitchell having included at least one somewhere in her oeuvre - she was very big on Morris dancing - not something I’ve ever done myself though I did try a bit of rapper sword whilst at university. Presumably it’s sword dancing in “Off With His Head”, judging by the title? I will have read it, can’t remember anything about it.

      Sovay

      Delete
    10. I'm looking forward to the hobby-horse Derby.
      Even more to the hobby-horse Grand National.
      Dylan Thomas's sane friend, Vernon Watkins (he was a bank manger, if you can imagine Thomas being friends with a bank manager) wrote a long poem, The Ballad of the Mari Lwyd, inspired by Welsh traditions.

      Delete
    11. The US title of that Marsh book is Death of a Fool, so if there was a hobby horse in the dance it apparently wasn't the murder victim!

      Delete
    12. I remember the Mari Lwyd from one of Susan Cooper's "The Dark is Rising" series - seriously scary ...

      Sovay

      Delete
    13. "Midnight. Midnight. Midnight. Midnight.
      Hark at the hands of the clock.
      Now dead men rise in the frost of the stars
      And fists on the coffins knock.
      They dropped in their graves without one sound;
      Then they were steady and stiff.
      But now they tear through the frost of the ground
      As heretic, drunkard and thief...."

      Delete
    14. I had never heard of the Mari Llwd and have just been looking it up - absolutely fascinating, and indeed seriously creepy, that is quite the poem by Watkins.
      Yes, you'd think Gladys MItchell would have one somewhere.
      BUT - I should have more faith in myself. When I checked out my post on the Marsh book (as opposed to online summaries), the excerpt makes it clear that the hobby horse IS an important part, and I have some excellent photos
      https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2018/12/winter-solstice-dramatic-celebration.html
      This discussion has taken a splendid and unexpected direction, a good swerve away from the original book.
      Morris dancing has featured several times on the blog, in addition to the Marsh.

      Delete
  4. Love the cover. Margery Sharp is one of those names you used to see in libraries, but I've never read her - I will now, though. The other day You And Yours on Radio 4 had an item about how hard it is for men to get published (Is this really true?) and annoyingly, when I was out of the room for a moment, they listed 'forgotten' female novelists. No doubt Margery Sharp was one; I'll try to find it and listen again.
    There's something very intriguing about boarding houses, the way spaces are arranged and divided up and so on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh that would be an interesting list. I would take quite some convincing that this is a hard time for men, but always willing to listen.
      Yes, boarding houses such a good setting for books for those reasons.

      Delete
  5. I have only read The Nutmeg Tree by Margery Sharp, but that was an absolute delight. It was sharp and funny and warm and life affirming and eminently readable. It somehow didn't seem to conform to any conventions or expectations, which made the reading experience one of constant interest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a great description of Nutmeg Tree - after I first read it I was forever snapping up secondhand copies to give to friends who I thought would love it.

      Delete
  6. I have obviously got to read something by her. This wonderful cover would be enough to tempt me in. Chrissie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a gorgeous picture! But start with either Nutmeg Tree, or The Eye of Love.

      Delete
    2. Christine Harding24 July 2025 at 15:33

      The Nutmeg Tree or The Gipsy in the Parlour.

      Delete
    3. I’ve noted everyone’s recommendation of “The Nutmeg Tree” and it’s on my Active Search list - however I’ve started with “Harlequin House” as eBay had a sensibly priced copy, and am enjoying it a lot. A little nuance of mourning wear amused me - Mr Partridge cuts himself a buttonhole from a municipal bed of roses, in defiance of the Do Not Pick notices - “In the centre of the bed he paused indeed, but it was memory, not conscience, that suspended his hand upon a Scarlet Glory. He had just remembered the it was the tenth anniversary of his wife’s death. Regretfully but firmly Mr Partridge spared the bud and selected a white Frau Karl Druschki instead.”

      Sovay

      Delete
    4. It is a charming book, I'm glad you are enjoying it!

      Delete
  7. I will go for The Nutmeg Tree! Chrissie

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment