Ballet Shoes and Carol Singers

We are in the midst of the annual Clothes in Books trope of Christmas in Books – seasonal scenes from random books, for no better reason than I like looking for the pictures, and I and some readers find them cheery and Xmas-y. Particularly, of course, those featuring murders, boredom and other miseries - but that's a long way from today's seasonal entry...



Ballet Shoes by Noel Streatfeild

published 1936

 


[excerpt] Then suddenly a lovely thing happened. A large choir of carol singers came under the window and sang. They all leaned out to hear, and it was like a play. The singers, both men and women, wore masks and coloured capes and hoods, and they carried lanterns. They sang most beautifully “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen,” and “The Holly and the Ivy,” and “Sleep, Holy Babe.” Pauline and Petrova took a plate each and collected money for them. Pauline did best, because she went to the kitchen, where the party was, and Petrova went to the nursery, where there was only Nana and Posy; but with what the boarders and Sylvia gave them, and their own pennies, they had nearly fifteen shillings.

Sylvia made them put on their coats, and Mr Simpson opened the front door for them, and they took the money out. The singers were just finishing the last verse of ‘Sleep, Holy Babe’. They waited till they had done, then they gave them the money. They were very pleased, and thought fifteen shillings a wonderful lot to have got; they said the money was all going to a children’s hospital. They asked if Pauline and Petrova would like to choose a carol before they went to another street. Pauline thought a moment, and before she had done thinking Petrova said - ‘Oh, please, “Like Silver Lamps”,’ so they sang that one.


comments: If you read my recent entry on the literary quiz Nemo’s Almanac, you will know that I have set a round with quotes about carol-singing – I’d like to tell you you’ll get a free starter with this one, but sadly it didn’t make the cut. (‘We need more poems’ the editor said.)

Ballet Shoes was one of my favourite books as a child, and as an adult too in fact, and is also one of the most featured on the blog.

Noel Streatfeild Ballet Shoes  Ballet Shoes 2  Ballet Shoes 3 Ballet Shoes 4

There is currently a stage adaptation of the book at the National Theatre in London: I saw it at the beginning of December and thought it was one of the best things I’ve seen on stage, absolutely tremendous. I took this picture of the set, which is enormous and wonderfully recognizable as the inside of 999 Cromwell Rd.



There were some changes to the plot, which didn’t worry me at all, and an attempt to make it more inclusive, as you would expect in 2024.

Then of course I reread the book, and yet again tried to work out how Noel Streatfeild does it: how does she give this very niche and specific story its universality? What is it about her writing that makes it mesmerising to a slice of humanity (not quite everyone, I do accept)? I can’t work it out, though I know it’s in the details. In the excerpt above, nearly all the detail is unnecessary, including Pauline 'thinking' while Petrova chooses the carol. But it creates a reality.

There is a scene where dresses are being made:

‘We could get a nice organdie for two and eleven. Four and a half yards those dresses take - that’s nine yards.’ She passed the paper to Petrova. ‘You’re good at figures: how much is nine yards at two and eleven?’

Then they need linings:

‘even if it’s only jap’

‘Get something good enough for one and six three,’ Nana thought, but she’d need two yards for each of them.

This is like a poem to me, perhaps that’s where Clothes in Books comes from. (and – on my umpteenth reading I think I found a mistake. Later in the book Streatfeild says

‘By dint of buying some extra organdie and letting out, and adding some frills, Nana had succeeded in making the frocks Pauline and Petrova had bought for ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’ audition do for Petrova and Posy.’

But they were hand-made, not bought…)

You can get the full lowdown on the organdie dresses in this post I did on them, very early days of the blog, which explains that ‘jap’ is ‘jap-silk’, a thin kind of silk, obv used for linings. This is what the finished dresses looked like, using an illo from the original book drawn by Ruth Gervis, who was Noel’s sister… (more on this here, in another entry about other child theatrical books)



I can’t ever see a black velvet dress with a white collar without thinking of the Alice audition. ‘Clothes panics’ is a frequent theme round here, and there is another relevant Streatfeild entry.

The 15 shillings (three-quarters of a pound) collected for the singers would be around £40 in modern-day currency, so a generous amount. 'One and six three' means that the fabric under discussion costs 'one shilling, sixpence and three farthings' per yard.

The book has a very specific timeframe, though it does not obtrude on the whole: however in January 1936 – in real life – George V died (it was the year of 3 x kings) and the pantomimes the girls are appearing in close for mourning, and never really get going again because no-one is in the mood. So a loss of money for the family there.

Recently (post on A Fatal Gift by Alec Waugh) we were discussing how a real-life war affects the novelist’s art, and that there are characters we worry about because we know what’s coming.

In this case, Posy

SPOILER

 

ends up heading to Czechoslovakia to study ballet with a particular company in Prague. In the second half of the 1930s. The future not looking good.

As ever when reading the book, I wonder: what does Sylvia do all day? Everyone else works hard and tries to protect her, she is seen as having grave responsibilities, but, y’know, what are they? Nana works tirelessly for literally no wages. There are two more servants – a cook and a maid.  The children work – at a job that one of them actually hates – and they cannot turn down any role because of the family finances. But no-one ever thinks for a second that Sylvia might go out to work to help out. Or that she is actually exploiting and living off these children. (This is something that is very much changed in the new stageshow)

As well as the many previous entries on this book, there are various other Streatfeild books, and I will mention in particular her memoir, A Vicarage Family – two previous Christmas entries – and the mysterious Whicharts, a very  strange and somewhat inexplicable grown-up version of Ballet Shoes. And other books for adults - NS was nothing if not prolific – under the name Susan Scarlett. Tags below.

The top picture shows sketches for costumes for carol singers in a musical on the life of Charlie Chaplin. NYPL

Comments

  1. I'm so glad you got to see a stage version of this, Moira! It must have been a great experience. You ask a good question, too, about how a writer can create a very specific, even niche, story, and still capture universal experiences, etc. That's a fair question and I think it's hard to do that well. I suppose as people we have more in common than not? If that's the case, then tapping into those common feelings and reactions might be part of it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Margot, I consider myself very lucky to have seen it.
      I like your idea that tapping into our common humanity is important - it's a cheering thought isn't it?

      Delete
  2. I love the entry, thank you. It is very much the book of childhood books. I also loved the film with Victoria Wood as Nanna.) I suppose Sylvia runs the large and rather complicated household, including juggling the finances. (What does Mrs Simpson do all day, I wonder?
    Perhaps the frock buying/ making isn't a mistake. Just of the time, cf. Olivia's flame coloured birthday silk in Invitation to the Waltz which I think (without checking) was referred to as a new frock, rather than just a bolt of fabric.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a good point about the "dress" perhaps being a dress length - normal usage in the 19th century certainly - I'm reading "The Small House at Allington" in which "The squire ... had sent [his two nieces] down brown silk dresses from London - so limited in quantity that the due manufacture of two dresses out of the material had proved to be beyond the art of woman, and the brown silk garments had been a difficulty from that day to this - the squire having a good memory in such matters and being anxious to see the fruits of his liberality."

      Sovay

      Delete
    2. Hilary - so glad it's a favourite of yours too; and yes Victoria Wood made a perfect Nana - I rewatched that TV film after seeing the stage show. Perhaps you are right about the turn of phrase - and now I'll have to go and look at Invitation to the Waltz, a great favourite and one I am astonished I have never covered here...
      Sovay - that's a very good find, and quite clear in its meaning! What an old nuisance the squire was.

      Delete
    3. I remember that in Henry Murger's "Scènes de la vie de bohème" from 1851, there is an occasion when the girls run out to get fabric for dresses to wear that evening, and one of them says: "This won't be the first time I buy a dress and make it in the same day." So yes, it was normal to use the term "buying a dress" meaning "buying the material for a dress" as late as the 19th century at least, and probably longer.

      Delete
    4. Thanks Birgitta - what a lovely wide range of references we have here!

      Delete
  3. I also loved this book as a child, and read it again a couple of years ago - it's still great. I do feel sorry for Nana with all those delicate fabrics to launder, which must have been really difficult. I felt sorry for the boy who can't say 'Hail' and so doesn't get the job as a fairy, which probably wouldn't happen now; his accent would be embraced (I think).
    Patrick Gale is a fan of the book; he referred to it somewhere in relation to Take Nothing With You, which is about a boy who plays the cello, as he himself does.
    I'm glad you were able to see the stage version and that it was good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now you mention it - they make a lot of the sewing and mending, but never really mention washing: perhaps it went out to the laundry...
      She makes no bones about the brutal world of the theatre in terms of rejection - poor old Winifred, so talented, 'the best all-round student', but not as pretty as Pauline.
      I didn't know that about Patrick Gale: interesting, thanks.

      Delete
  4. What middle-class ladies seem to do in the 1930s is write letters - to whom and about what, who can say? I'm sure this comes up in "Rebecca" - the second Mrs de Winter, newly arrived at Manderley, is drifting about at a loose end until one of the staff tells her Rebecca used to spend all morning writing letters, and directs her to a room with a desk still full of Rebecca's personalised stationery. The Provincial Lady seems to spend a lot of time on correspondence as well, particularly when the house-parlourmaid's given notice again. It's hard not to feel that her life would be less stressful if she just embraced the housework herself, rather than tearing her hair out for days and weeks at a time over the Servant Problem.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are so right! Dealing with correspondence takes an inordinate amount of time.
      And yes, it is hard not to lose patience with those women (mostly) going on and on and ON about the servant problem. And then after the war it was going to be even more hopeless...

      Delete
  5. Your post reminded me that I've never known what carol Petrova is referring to. But now of course one can Google and there it is on Youtube - very pretty but completely unfamiliar still.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that's me exactly! Years of not knowing, and now it takes a second. But, like you, I have never come across it in any other context. (Though it seems to be *quite* well-known?)

      Delete
  6. Open Library doesn't have Ballet Shoes but I read Vicarage Family. You remember the recent discussion about WWI in books--when 1914 came around in this book I got really worried about cousin John, and sure enough she got new of his death at the very end. I thought that ending was rather odd, but it was an interesting book anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed. connections of hers have claimed that she didn't actually know John all that well, and appropriated his death for the book's structure. I think that says more about the people making the claim - what an intrusive and mean thing to say. I'm always surprised by people who say they know more about X's childhood than X themselves...

      Delete
  7. Ballet Shoes is one of my favorites too and I alternate between preferring the "making do" of clothes here vs the delicious mixture of Harriet's awful clothes and Lalla's awesome wardrobe in Skating Shoes/White Boots (have you done this one?). I know both of these practically by heart. Bonus in White Boots - the awful uncle's dreadful food hampers he expects the Johnsons to sell!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No I haven't done White Boots, and you are right - I should! I re-read it not that long ago, and what amazed me was the lack of firmness in Harriet's parents. Good for the plot I suppose, and parents tend not to show up that well in Streatfeild...

      Delete
  8. She wrote the Whicharts first. Much the same characters and plot. She claimed Ballet Shoes "flowed from her pen", while she was rewriting for a younger audience, leaving out boyfriends and protégeurs. Clothes are important to catch a wealthy man. "Petrovna" becomes a car mechanic and meets up with her mother. The girls are waspish and snobbish. (Sorry, "Petrova".)

    The correspondence: some would have been ordering stuff, and paying the resulting bills. At the same time you kept the accounts. And made appointments: dentist, hair, lawyer, lunch with friend.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous is me, Lucy Fisher. Is there another word for "protégeur"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Protector sounds very Georgette Heyer doesn't it. We do need a word reflecting the nuances of the arrangement...
      I need to go back to the Wicharts and do a proper post I think - I was surprised when I checked it out that I only mentioned it briefly. Next year...
      Do you remember The Sloane Rangers' Handbook? (Of course you do!) In that I think there was a funny description of a Sloane married lady dealing with her mail: firing off congrats to a friend for a life event, ordering a catalogue, looking at possible courses in china-mending... I must look it up. She had a desk with quirky bits and pieces on it, and liked to buy fancy stationery. WILDLY recognizable.

      Delete
    2. Oh, and the way she writes her address drives the Post Office mad: she doesn't want anything commong like street number or postcode, so makes it sound posh and vague: Twyford House, Twyford Lane, Twyford.

      Delete
  10. I suppose Sylvia planned the meals with Cook, and did accounts (I think there's a scene where she struggles with this) and perhaps some light housework. Presumably she is a "surplus woman" and would have expected to marry. It's also interesting that when the money runs out for the Fossils' private school towards the beginning of the book, there's never any question of the girls going to the local state school. Likewise in various E Nesbit books, if there's no money for private education they just don't seem to go to school at all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry that's me

      Delete
    2. Thanks Susanna, yes, though it still does seem to contrast with everyone else in the house.
      In the TV version, it is spelled out that they can't go to the state school because they'll get common accents.
      Girl children of course - education not so important. Not as important as speaking nicely and making the right friends.

      Delete
    3. Awful! Even allowing for some authorial exaggeration, the world she desribes is very hard. A good thing that times have changed. There is a lot of discussion now of 'gentle parenting' - at least it's better than some of the horror stories from 100 years ago.

      Delete
  11. On the point of Sylvia not getting a job ... I think perhaps you can say that she started up a small business. Yes, she was prompted into it by Nana, and yes it ultimately failed, but I think it lasted about six years? Posy was six when they started taking boarders, and twelve at the end? I recall reading somewhere that nowadays the majority of small business started in Australia (may or may not apply to other countries) don't make it past five years.
    I imagine she must have done some of the housework, since it would be a lot of rooms for Clara to look after on her own. Plus planning things like meals (would she have done the ordering of food, or would that be part of Cook's job?)
    It still doesn't seem like a very full day, but maybe more than just writing letters? And she does resist letting the children contribute - though admittedly she lets herself be overruled. Similarly, she tells Petrova that she can stop, but again is happy to believe Petrova when she (untruthfully) says she 'loves it'. I think Sylvia probably does see sending them to Madame as a way of getting them the kind of employable skills she doesn't have? It's not (or at least, not consciously) an attempt to get them to contribute to the house.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a good defence of her, and she genuinely seems to have the children's interests at heart. Though she should have seen that Petrova was unhappy.... and also Nana worked her legs off, non-stop, for no wages!

      Delete
  12. I rather like The Whicharts, and I think it is fascinating to see what she kept, what she changed, and what she dropped when she wrote Ballet Shoes (I looked at this in my Master's thesis).
    But of course it's much bleaker than Ballet Shoes, and the ending is very bittersweet.
    In Beyond the Vicarage, she says the publisher's readers of The Whicharts 'were of one mind. While agreeing about the faults in construction one and all had advised "Publish it as it is, she will only spoil it if she tries to alter it."'
    I'm inclined to agree (I'm sure the readers would be gratified to hear this :-) ) - some of her later adult books are arguably better written, but they lack the freshness of The Whicharts. And yet she retained - and improved on - this freshness in her children's books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes, that exact topic is one I find fascinating. How did she ever decide to do what she did with it?
      And yes, it is very different from her other books-for-adults - you would scarcely guess that it was the same writer. There certainly was something very unusual about the book. I am now really keen to re-read it.

      Delete
  13. I read Ballet Shoes quite a while ago and found it very pleasant.
    https://momobookblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/streatfeild-noel-ballet-shoes.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing that with us - you sum the book up nicely. Glad you enjoyed it.

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Moira. And thanks for the visit.

      Delete

Post a Comment