The Mind of Mr JG Reeder by Edgar Wallace
collection of short stories, published 1925
Margaret hardly knew what to expect when she came into the
flamboyant foyer of the Orpheum. What was the evening equivalent to the
square-topped derby and the tightly-buttoned frock-coat of ancient design which
[Mr Reeder] favoured in the hours of business? She would have passed the
somewhat elegantly dressed gentleman in the correct pique waistcoat and the
perfectly tied butterfly bow, only he claimed her attention.
‘Mr Reeder!’ she gasped.
It was indeed Mr Reeder: with not so much as a shirt-stud wrong;
with a suit of the latest mode, and
shoes glossy and V-toed. For Mr Reeder, like many other men, dressed according
to his inclination in business hours, but accepted blindly the instructions of
his tailor in the matter of fancy raiment
He took her cloak. He had previously purchased programmes and a large box of chocolates, which he carried by a satin ribbon.
comments: Mr JG Reeder was mentioned in the comments on this recent
post:
King
of Tosh: E Phillips Oppenheim
And he has popped up a few times before btl, with great
enthusiasm from readers, and I knew I should look at the stories again. I first read them in the early 1970s, when
there was a hugely enjoyable TV series based on them.
Wallace and Oppenheim seem to go together – dashing
writers, very productive, giving the impression of enjoying their own lives,
and the lives of their characters.
Mr JG Reeder is great fun: he looks and acts like a dull
dusty senior civil servant, but actually has an investigative connection with the Public
Prosecutor’s office, and has ‘the mind of a criminal’.
This means that despite his uninspiring appearance and
manner, he has deep knowledge of
criminal history, and an unerring instinct for what the bad guys will do next.
Many of the stories consist of a crook thinking he has got the better of Mr
JGR, while we know that he will be one step ahead of them.
The tales can be somewhat gruesome, and with a very casual
attitude to the death of criminals.
The collection I have has eight stories, and that’s about
right for one sitting – I don’t know if there are more, and I would read them,
but after a gap. During the course of them, Mr JGR embarks on a slow-moving
romance, which we hope will end happily. However a certain kind of modern
reader will disapprove, as there is a large age-gap, he is much older than his
young lady. [people objecting to age-gaps in fiction, particularly old school
novels, is a thing that annoys me very much. The author made it up, it didn’t
happen, and who are you to object?]
There are some intriguing moments – a young man is worried about the ‘boudoir atmosphere’ in the office where his girlfriend works, a phrase I
liked very much.
There is a lot of what you might call scampering around, weird ideas in people’s heads, and out-and-out melodrama. Some of it reminded me of Agatha Christie’s Parker Pyne mysteries – no bad thing. In one of those, The Case of the Discontented Soldier, there is talk of a traditional fictional trope of people being trapped in a cellar with water rising and threatening to drown them. Mr Parker Pyne suggets to Ariadne Oliver (an early appearance) that it is a cliched, unoriginal idea, but she is not having it: “People are used to reading about such things as water rising in a cellar….Knowing about it beforehand gives it an extra thrill….The public is conservative, Mr Pyne, it likes the old well-worn gadgets.” On first reading that I literally thought ‘but I’ve never come across that at all’. And here it is! In a Wallace/Reeder story called The Investors.
It’s possible Wallace was better at short stories than
novels – he gets slapdash and careless details in long form, more chance of
staying on track with short stories.
But even in these stories author or reader can get lost. Mr
Reeder and a villainess are on either side of a closed door. This section took ages to
parse:
In a second there was a jagged
gap [in the door] through which the black muzzle of an automatic was thrust.
‘Put down that jug or I will
blow your features into comparative chaos!’ said Mr Reeder pedantically.
I didn’t know which party was holding the automatic, and I
wondered how Mr R could see the jug, but also wondered if this was some
esoteric slang. ‘Put down that jug…’ has a certain ring.
He sees the woman concerned: ‘in her hand was a huge
enamelled iron jug’. Not a metaphor then. I will not trouble you with the means
by which the jug becomes a deadly weapon, which must be dropped.
All great fun.
Not much in the way of clothes, I think Wallace didn’t have
time to put long descriptions. But there is a Russian Princess, Pauline
Dimitroff, small dark and beautiful. But is she a real princess?
And a certain amount of general high life, Mayfair clubs, and the trip to theatre. So some random well-dressed women as well as the 1923 theatre foyer picture.


Thanks, Moira. I had a good laugh when I read this. 'Put down that jug' could become a catchphrase. I remember enjoying these ages ago. Wallace could be sloppy as you say but I feel he makes up for that with the verve with which he writes. Now I want to read them again. Chrissie
ReplyDeleteExactly - it was enjoyable in all kinds of different ways
DeleteI am pretty sure I have encountered the "water rising in a" idea in a Paul Temple story. Francis Durbridge was not shy about using clichés.
ReplyDeleteYes he had an eye for what appealed to people, and that would have been much later.
DeleteActually I've just had a flashback to the early puppet drama Stingray (precursor to Thunderbirds on children's TV) and pretty sure there was an epi with rising wate threatening the heroes.
I remember a Paul Temple film with the water-rising situation, too, maybe the same story? In a whole 'nother kind of story, I have a vague memory of Lucy and Ethel being in that predicament?
DeleteI think you are overestimating how much UK readers know about US TV Marty! After considerable thought I decided that you might be talking about Lucille Ball?
DeleteMarty, I think they were trapped in a shower cubicle. Of course we are speaking of the marvelous Lucille Ball and Vivian Vance.
DeleteNerys
thanks Nerys, I'm glad you all know this reference!
DeleteReeder's apparent age may be as misleading as his apparent inoffensiveness. He actually is "a ...senior civil servant", who chooses to present himself as "dull and dusty" when he is actually lethal and bloodthirsty. Ss I said, the most important aspect of his clothes is: how does he conceal the varied and lethal armoury he carries in them?
ReplyDeleteIndeed you did, and he has a lot packed away in his frock coat. Of course his umbrella hides a sword-point-style object, but there's still a lot to be packed away in his pockets. It must spoil the line...
DeleteShades of that tight-fitting dress in Murder at the Vicarage. Wouldn't any bad guys at the theatre be suspicious of strange lumps in Mr Reeder's clothes? Like the cliche of the gangster with the sinister bulge in his jacket.
DeleteEasier to hide in mens' formal clothes than in that notorious light summer dress!
DeletePerhaps his clever tailor has ways of smoothing out the bumps 😉
There are Reeder novels but they are variable. One is a real melodrama involving tunnels in a cliff that emerge thru a cupboard in a manor house. Margaret swims to safety along many miles of coast and... I won't spoil it for you.
ReplyDeleteI will definitely have to find that the next time I have a need for Reeder...
DeleteIt's interesting that Wallace would be better at short stories than novels, Moira. I actually think many writers are better at one or the other. As I was reading your post, I was thinking of Mr. Parker Pyne, so I nodded my head when you mentioned him. I do see some similarities. There may not be very much about clothes in this collection, but I could clearly see that outfit you described at the beginning of your post. Wallace could write vivid descriptions, in my opinion...
ReplyDeleteThanks Margot, and yes I am always intrigued by the question of who is better at short stories and who at novels - it seems to me quite a useful distinction
DeleteWhat strikes me is that Mr Wallace actually divorced his first wife to marry his secretary about this time. Just had to cut off his side whiskers and prove himself an action hero.
ReplyDeleteChris Wallace
Great perception!
DeleteAre you related?
No, he adopted Wallace as his surname I believe. I have a biography but can’t get at it at the moment. Very interesting life. An illegitimate child, he treated illegitimacy unusually for the time. Reared in poor circumstances, he loved life in a big way.
DeleteChris Wallace
He does sound like a fascinating character, and one who achieved a lot
DeleteI'm aware that Love blossoms any-old-where, and for all I know Mr Reeder is dev'lishly attractive. But yes, I am one of Those Readers. I might not stop reading a book if I came across a May/September-or-later romance, but I'd definitely groan and say "Not again!" because it's one of the hoariest of cliches, and is still going strong. Not to mention the potential Ick factor. It annoys me at least as much as my attitude annoys CiB. (And somehow the May party is almost always female, or if male then the romance will probably fail.) The reasoning that "it's only a story" doesn't convince me because that could be said of any aspect of a book, such as racism or "casual anti-Semiticism" or cruelty. As a reader, I have every right to object to something that's distasteful to me, as long as I don't try to ban a book or otherwise force my opinions on other readers. End of rant.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, all (almost all) views welcome here, and people can of course read what they want.
DeleteBut - more of a cliche than all the other romantic tropes?
And I just don't think it's intrinsically wrong. Of course it's wrong if there are power/control issues, but isn't it insulting to women to say that they are not able to make their own decisions and choose their true loves?
I think arranged marriages for the aristocracy/royals weren't a great idea - but they happened, and sometimes they were successful, and it doesn't offend me to read about them....
I don't think it's wrong in itself, in fact I just finished a book in which it happened and I didn't mind. It's not limited to the romance genre. I don't read many romance novels but I keep coming upon it, anyway. Maybe the US is just more youth-obsessed than Britain, and it happens here more often both in fiction and real life--the aging hero/celebrity who "gets the girl" (or trophy wife) when the girl is young enough to be his daughter. An older woman often gets dumped in the process and I wonder what will happen to the girl when she's no longer young--will she get dumped too? I also wonder if the girl is looking for a father figure, which seems a little icky. (In real-life but hardly ever in fiction, she might just be looking for a sugar daddy.) And of course there is the good ol' generation gap. I remember in the movie House Calls a remark made by Walter Matthau to Glenda Jackson, that it was nice to date a woman who knew who Ronald Colman was!
DeleteThen aren't we agreeing? - it's not intrinsically or automatically wrong, it has to be judged case by case...
DeleteI have a Wordsworth (for younger UK and American readers, a low-priced retailer of books which were out of copyright - £1 in the 1990s) which has two novels and eight short stories.
DeleteIt seems that in the first novel (Room 13), Wallace had Reeder as a secondary character, but decided that he was the better long-term bet, - a little like how Mrs Bradley took over halfway through Speedy Death.
Even without taking into account how different things were in the 1920s and 30s when marrying a man who was both financially well off and considerate was a little like winning the pools on an eight-score draw week, I think JGR and Margaret Belman are definitely on the less icky side of the equation, especially as at the end of Terror Keep she more or less proposes to him. Now, I'll accept that Wallace was maybe just justifying his own conduct, but he does play it so that Reeder is expecting a rejection.
Thanks for the extra information. I remember those Wordsworth classics and their £1 price tag.
DeleteI haven't got to the end of their romance, but Margaret seems to know what she is doing
I accept that relationships should be judged case by case. However, there is an infuriating GA trope of the enchanting young heroine, often an actual teenager, swept away by a masterful older man (looking at you, Patricia Wentworth). My least favorite example is in Night at the Vulcan by Ngaio Marsh. Martyn is 19 years old, alone in a foreign country, and with no particular personality. She is told by the older man (who has been suspected of BEING HER FATHER) that they have a love for the ages. Martyn, please go out and live a little first. There seemed to be a need for the female lead to be very young and to be romantically paired by the end of the novel.
DeleteAdrianDominic, I never understood the pools, but I did enjoy Spot the Ball of beloved childhood memory.
Nerys
Spot the ball was a memory of my youth as well, although the reward was at best the cost of an evening out, as opposed to life-changing, as it could be for the pools.
DeleteIn some more cynical novels, the idea of a February/November wedding seemed to be formulated on the basis that an energetic young woman could cause the older man to shuttle off this mortal coil sooner rather than later.
I also recall a film about Florence Foster Jenkins, where Hugh Grant played one of his strengths as being a cad who does not deliberately humiliate his target and does his best to make her happy (while also having outside interests).
Oddly, in Bleak House, Dickens got it right with John Jarndyce, both being slightly creepy by modern standards and recognising it in himself. I recall Denholm Elliott playing him, who was excellent at playing flawed but basically well-meaning characters.
Nerys: I think we can all get annoyed about heroines' choices, and author's choices too. But I think it's important to keep a distinction between those matters, and behaviour that is illegal and unconsciable. And people and their needs and their loves and their attractions are as different as their fingerprints. Women can make their own choices.
DeleteIt is hard now to remember how all-pervading 'the pools' was for a time in the 20th century. that familiar grid-pattern form, the syndicates (bound to end in tears if they ever won), the announcement at the end of the TV football results: 'Telegram claims for 23 points'.
The theory was, I believe, that games of complete chance were forbidden, but the football pools were a game of skill, because you were predicting the results of the matches. Though famously many people put in their crosses at random, or used the same numbers every week.
I presume the lottery (early 1990s?) finished it off - no skill required.
I grew up in Liverpool where Littlewoods Pools, the main firm, was based, and had a giant building dominating the route of my bus journey into town. Many many people worked there, which meant their relations couldn't do Littlewoods Pools, quite an issue. (They had to do Vernons, a much smaller org, I guess).
Adrian Dominic: Do they still have Spot the Ball?
DeleteExcellent discusion & examples of age-divided relationships from your varied cultural knowledge
Of course consenting adults should be allowed to live their own lives. I was objecting to an irritating and rather lazy trope in books of a certain era and what that trope was telling women. I guess I’ll just be glad that it is not usually no longer deployed!
DeleteNerys
I'd agree that judging case-by-case is the best approach, but I still think there are too many cases. Certainly many marriages were, and are, made for security as well as for love by women. I can understand that, but I do wonder about the "long run" of such matches. Instead of being like Knightley and Emma, the result could be more like Casaubon and Dorothea! (Some readers even consider the Knightley/Emma match a little creepy.) There's also my old bugbear, the double standard. Why must the woman almost always be the younger partner? Maybe if folks can give me some examples where the female is older and the male isn't considered a cad or gigolo, I might feel differently?
DeleteDon't the books just reflect what happens in real life?
DeleteAn office with a boudoir atmosphere....that could be alarming, depending on who you were!
ReplyDeleteEmlyn Williams writes about Edgar Wallace in one of his memoirs - perhaps he was in one of Wallace's plays?
Christine
Oh, interesting! Wallace was quite the man about town, and living life at speed - it's suprising he doesn't turn up in more memoirs
Delete