The Late Mrs Prioleau by Monica Tindall

 

The Late Mrs Prioleau by Monica Tindall

 

published 1946

 

 

daughter/daughter-in-law in mourning


I wish I could remember how I came to buy this book – it’s been sitting on my Kindle for a couple of years. Perhaps it was just that it was a Furrowed Middlebrow/Dean St Press book. Always  a sign of quality – this is my goto sentence:

And, shoutout as ever to the Dean St Press who have made it available to us and earn my gratitude every week, it seems.

The Late Mrs Prioleau is hard to categorize, and this I vaguely remember from when I first heard about it. Another comment I like to make is that 'this author wouldn’t have done well in a modern creative writing class', as the structure is strange and patchy to say the least. (It is always just an observation about the class, I don’t necessarily think a creative writing course is the last word).

Anyway. I think I vaguely thought it was a crime story, but it is more of an investigation, with unlikely details. The narrator, Susan, has married a naval officer, Henry Prioleau, but doesn’t  know his family: the first line of the book is very striking:

The first and only time I saw my mother-in-law was when she lay dead in her coffin.

Later:

No one seemed to be particularly sorry that Mrs Prioleau was dead, nor to expect that anyone else should be.

Susan becomes aware that her new family is dysfunctional, verging on toxic, and that her mother-in-law was – to use a technical term – a piece of work.

There are telling vignettes from minor characters:

“When your poor Aunt Louise died I married again, and your mother took up a most offensive attitude. She said that everyone was talking and that it was tantamount to committing . . . er . . . adultery. Why, I never discovered, except that it was maybe a little . . . soon.”

“You were probably not very comfortable as a widower?” suggested Melissa, with the expression of one prodding a rat to see if it was dead.

And this about Henry:

He had heard far too much about being made worthy, and his faith in prayer had been badly damaged some time previously when he was given Southey’s Life of Wesley for Christmas instead of a bicycle.

Susan doesn’t set out to find out  more, but circumstances lead her to the dead woman’s story: she helps with some house-clearing, she spends a summer with a new sister-in-law, she meets an aunt in Oxford. And eventually she reads a diary and letters. One part of me thinks this is a very jumpy way to tell a story, and that it doesn’t all fit together, but the rest of me was rather seduced by the beautiful writing, the creation of atmosphere, the details of life in the various eras of the book.

There is the summer of 1939, waiting for WW2 to begin. Then Susan is taking civilian jobs in London in the Blitz, then she is in Oxford. During her various encounters she sees more and more what a terrible mother Helena Prioleau was, one whose dread hand affected all her four children. A deeply unpleasant person, who made life miserable for those around her.



And then in the second half of the book she reads letters and diaries to find out what made her that way.  There is a long description of the life of Anglo-Irish poshos before and after the turn of the century – a subject, always, of great interest around here. (See for example the works of Molly Keane). The crumbling big house, the dances, the army officers, the Dublin Horse Show,  the fear of ‘trade’. Everything goes wrong, although Helena is so awful that it’s hard to feel too much sympathy for her. Her story was not a cheerful one, and the final revelation is not a surprise, and has its ironic side.



Helena was, on the whole, a careless and unloving parent. Her daughter Melissa takes this to startling extremes with the next generation – though it wasn’t clear to me how far Tindall approved of this.

Her son, with the impulsive bravery of his five years, was walking deliberately into the sea. I scrambled up, but she clutched my arm, holding me back. “Let him learn,” she whispered, white-faced and rigid. We must have been some fifty yards away from the children, yet she watched without cry or movement until Peter was swept off his feet and rolled over in the inevitable wave. She waded in then, and fished him out.




Shortly afterwards Peter climbs to the top of a dangerous rock formation and is told to get himself down. These incidents bothered me more than some of the more blatant bad behaviour. He’s five years old.  Melissa says ‘Mother made such a terrible hash of everything . . . her own life, us, being married to Father . . . that I determined I’d do quite differently.’

This is tied up in the upbringing of Austin, Helena’s first and favoured son, who was ‘adored and spoilt’, unlike the others. Helena is devastated when he lies about his age and joins up as a soldier in WW1. Not everyone has quite so much concern:

And Dr Prioleau gave him a special mention in family prayers as “Thy servant Austin, who is now numbered among Thy Crusaders.”

“Most of the time,” Austin’s sister commented acidly, “he was crusading on Salisbury Plain, but that made no difference to either of them.”

But Austin is eventually sent to the front, and suffers from shellshock. In the contemporary sections, he is what we would call Special Needs, although no-one has much sympathy for that either.

The other children got out of their home as fast as they could, basically running away from their mother, but Austin and his dogs were there till the end.

This is a strange book, beautifully-written and compelling: it seems such a shame that Monica Tindall did not write any more novels. Yes, it could have been better structured, but I was very much struck with the moments, the phrases, the descriptions that I know will linger in my mind...

Ranilya. - NYPL Digital Collections

Hatoriffic Wasp Waists in Clarinbridge | The convoluted titl… | Flickr

Journal des demoiselles - NYPL Digital Collections

Sur la plage. - NYPL Digital Collections

Comments

  1. Those are some memorable descriptions and lines, Moira. I can see how they would stay with you. And the family saga story sounds compelling in its own way. You make some interesting points about the story structure. It certainly sounds different to most stories I've read. Interesting look at dysfunction, too....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... and I'm still mulling over whether it's a crime book or not! I forgot to mention the horrible letters this woman writes.

      Delete
  2. The mother sounds like the distaff version of Patrick Melrose's father.....I'm intrigued by the titles of the images. I looked up Ranilya an d found that it was a "premium" French fabric, but nothing else. And what does "hatoriffic" mean, is it something to do with fancy hats or rather with wasp waists?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The top picture is to show a coat that could be made with that fabric - a sample is pinned to it, so it's probably aimed at fashion buyers rather than customers.
      The other pic is from the National Library of Ireland, whose collection is a lovely place to browse; they are tremendously relaxed and charming, they chat about the pictures, they encourage people to comment and to provide information about the photograps. And, they give them all creative commons licences so people like me can use them. It is not clear in this case who gave the photo its title: the original supplier or the lovely social media team.
      I believe it's not a real word, but I wonder if it's a comment on the women's hats being wider than their waists...?

      Delete
  3. The book sounds so interesting! Unfortunately my library can't access it. (I will survive! lol) -Kate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a shame! Maybe it will turn up one day

      Delete
  4. It's routine to wonder how women went about their lives wearing corsets and long skirts. The hatoriffic picture above is making me imagine what it would be like to go out and about in one of those hats. It would affect the way you stood and walked and sat, I should think. Anchoring your hat to your head was no doubt a skill to be mastered. I remember Lady Mary from Downton Abbey saying "I'm going upstairs to take off my hat," which I always thought was a euphemism for "pee" or "get away from you people for a while" but I guess hat removal was a process too.
    Nerys

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Having a maid would help a lot!
      I can just hear Lady Mary saying that, I like your analysis

      Delete
    2. Something like "writing letters"--I know people did write a lot of letters (regarding household management, not just keeping up with friends and family), but I think it was also often a good way to say "I must be alone for awhile."

      I'm not sure I will like this but I loved the voice of the sample and the Kindle version is cheap so I have sprung for it! If nothing else, I'm glad to support Dean Street Press.

      Delete
    3. Just looking at those hats makes my neck hurt. Plus the amount of hair piled on top of the head, underneath the hat! And from what little I know about corsets, they weren't conducive to a slouching posture, either.

      Delete
    4. And here we are with the perfect illustration of letter writing from the book in question: "When [Austin] added that he was sure I wouldn't mind nursing the dogs in the car I told him that I must stay behind and write a letter to Henry" (Kindle location 806).

      Some of old Mrs Prioleau's clothes sound marvelous--are those vaguely Celtic wool dresses the pre-Raphaelite style? Or something more modern?

      Delete
    5. Marty: it is very hard to understand how they coped, and why they put up with it. I know that's a simplistic view, but...

      Dame E: I remember when I was in the midst of the busiest time for dealing with young children and work, talking to a friend who said 'well I really like to have an hour in the morning to deal with things at my desk, so I have a nice coffee, and look at my emails', which I guess is the modern version. I was rueful listening, my life seemed to be constantly rushing from one thing to the next. But now to some extent I can do that.
      Yes, Mrs P's dresses sounded wonderful - I think that Arts & Crafts look, somewhat pre-Raphaelite as you say. It was definitely a look - somewhat bohemian, artsy, elegant but not corseted. It would be good to find some nice pictures. When I was looking for wedding dresses for Harriet Vane, there was one I really liked, by Fortuny, in this mode. (I felt it wasn't what Harriet would've worn, I just liked it)
      https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-dorothy-l-sayers-society-harriet.html
      I can imagine, say, E Nesbit wearing that kind of dress

      Delete
    6. Here's a Pinterest page showing some Arts & Crafts style dresses. Don't know if this was what Mrs P wore, though. https://www.pinterest.com/middletowngirls/reform-aesthetic-arts-and-crafts-movement-clothing/

      Delete
    7. Great collection of images, thank you. I like the way some of them are very much what I was imagining, and others are quite unexpectedly fussy...

      Delete
  5. The book sounds intriguing - I shall add it to my list.

    I love the hattorific photo. The woman on the far right looks at first glance as though she’s wearing an early and rather daring v-neck, but on closer examination she has a lace or net insert of the kind Miss Silver is still using in the 1940s and 1950s to fill in the necklines of her dresses. And what about the short woman in the patterned blouse? A maid accompanying the party? Or local shopkeeper posing with the toffs for some reason? Perhaps more likely the latter, as her cap doesn’t look like outdoor headgear so she is probably close to home (I’m in agreement with the comments on the photo site -this looks like a street scene, not people posing outside their Big House).

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can just look and look at that picture, right?
      I wanted an Irish family, and I got that though the comments suggest they were not actually in Ireland! That's fine though, and definitely a street scene.
      I assumed the short woman was a servant, but then you wouldnt think she'd be in a picture - a local shopkeeper makes sense. For her Instagram account I expect, 'ooh can I have a quick selfie?' 😀😀😀

      Delete
    2. I know that the short lady is a teensy little person, but her wasp-waist bothers me.....

      Delete
    3. The proportion doesn't look natural

      Delete
    4. I think it's because she's much fuller in the bust than the other women in the picture that her waist looks disproportionately small.

      Sovay

      Delete
    5. I'm dithering a bit, because she is really slight, and that would suggest a small waist even if she has a large bust...

      Delete
  6. Agatha Christie, An Autobiography - very helpful on clothes. She had long blonde hair she could sit on, but reveals you scraped it into a bun on the top of the head and then added "switches".

    "That hair of hers is a wig, or I'll eat my back switch!" Miss Marple in The Thirteen Problems.

    Christie also recounts a country house party where they went out riding and the switches fell off one by one. She laughed and went back to pick them up. She is later praised by one of the men: "You were such a good sport picking up all that false hair!" She also recalls anchoring the big hat with hatpins, and how that felt in a high wind. (Lucy)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes - she had a really good memory of her clothes and of details like that about the switches. She didnt use them as much as she might have in her books (not big on detailed clothes descriptions) but when she did you could trust her.

      Delete
  7. Gwen Raverat in Period Piece also describes wearing these styles and how awful girls looked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another book with great clothes descriptions!

      Delete
    2. IIRC she comments on the agony when the wind catches the enormous, firmly hat-pinned headwear and threatens to rip one's hair out by the roots.

      Sovay

      Delete

Post a Comment