Brother of the More Famous Jack by Barbara Trapido
published 1982
I came back to this book because I wanted to do a post on
fictional families, and you can see the more general results here:
Falling
in Love with the Whole Family
I loved Brother of the More Famous Jack with all my
heart when it first came out in the early 1980s, and over the years I have
given or lent it to many people (I note with narrowed eyes that the copy I have
now is not my original one, but a much later reprint – someone kept mine). And
the strange thing is that everyone who reads it thinks the heroine is exactly
their age, their era. You would also assume that the author is the same age as
Katherine, if feels autobiographical, but she very much isn’t.
Barbara Trapido was born in 1941.Reading the book again now, it is very clear that it starts in the 1960s, when the heroine would be around 18 - with a few time-anomalies if I’m honest. Katherine wears an extremely short mini-dress, actually a rugby shirt, for her university interview, which did not sound likely to me. [For clarity - and see comments below - it is wearing it for an interview that I am arguing with, not its existence or Katherine wearing it in other circs]
There
isn’t much fixed by time in the book, except later going to see the film of Women in
Love, which came out in 1969. But Katherine can be any age, whatever suits
you…
She is unofficially adopted by the family of her tutor,
Jacob, who lives a Bohemian life with his wife Jane and their raft of children,
including eligible sons. It is a wonderful description of family life in all
its many directions. And then there is an interlude in Italy - but she is drawn
back to the Goldmans as we all are to our families.
There are a few moments that make you grit your
teeth in 2026 – the book is, as I like to say, very much of its time. There are
some shockers, such as a ‘pretend’ game in the car where the children choose
people to fake shoot. If a character says that the feminist magazine Spare Rib
is ‘for raped lesbians’, and that is exactly the outrageous remark that that person would have said
in the early 1970s, is that OK or not?
Other bits of shocking dialogue are weirdly exhilarating.
Jane tries to persuade Jonathan – who is 16 or 17 - to
apply to university. He says – this is to his mother – ‘It’ll take you a
lot of f…ing Smarties to get me to write that exam, lady.’
She is unmoved but tells him not to get anyone pregnant.
‘I’m not stupid’, Jonathan
said.
‘Someone has yet to prove that
bright young men are less capable of impregnating women.’
Later on, a visitor objects to the way Jonathan talks to
his mother: ‘a chap oughtn’t to… Not in my book.’
‘And what book is that?’ Jonathan said. ‘Biggles? Who are
you anyway?’
Katherine has fallen in love with Roger, who is probably
the least appealing family member to the reader. He has featured before on the
blog, interestingly, for this remark, which he makes during a testy
conversation after ‘exchanging a moment’s hatred’ with his father. (Don’t we
all recognize that?)
‘To call a violin a fiddle is a form of name-dropping,’ he
says coldly. ‘it’s a familiarity you earn the right to use – that’s if you like
name-dropping.’ *** see below for deets.
Fashion features a lot – hats such as Katherine’s crocheted
string hat (top pic), made it herself. Roger has a ‘remarkable floppy black beret which
gives him a look of having come but late from Wittenburg’ – ie what is
henceforward referred to as his Hamlet hat.
Katherine has
‘a great love affair with clothes. They are consumingly
important to me and I often pull off a successfully Voguey look. Once when I
was crossing Tottenham Court Road a team of Japanese photographers began to
click their shutters.’
That has such a modern influencer-Instagram feel doesn’t
it? – just what I was saying about the book fitting to any age.
Later she wears a maroon beret to meet a
possibly-intimidating person who was headgirl at school, and who turns out to
be nice enough: ‘there was no suggestion that she would report me for wearing
my beret at a rakish angle.’
And she is a very keen knitter – Jane pays her to make a
huge black sweater for Jonathan which makes him look like ‘the God of Thunder
with a migraine’, and later she is able to earn money by making fancy designer
knitwear.
Roger gives her an embroidered butterfly patch from his
jeans, and she attaches it to her bookbag. Now THAT is very much keyed to the times… though I was surprised to find that they are still
freely available to buy.
This is a very satisfying book, and I was absolutely
delighted to find that I loved it as much as ever on re-reading.
*** In a post on Noel
Streatfeild’s The Apple Bough, I had this objection:
Throughout the book, the genius child and his violin-playing are referred to as a fiddler, fiddle-playing, a fiddle teacher, a fiddle. I thought this was the height of affectedness. Elly G [this is the legendary author of the Ruth books, Elly Griffiths – see how casually I refer to her] says that a character in Brother of the More Famous Jack by Barbara Trapido, an all-time great book, and can't believe it has never featured on the blog, takes the excellent line that you have to earn the right to be that affected…
In The
Rachel Incident by Caroline O’Donoghue, a more recent
favourite of mine, the titular Rachel becomes friendly with her tutor’s family,
with rather different results. The Trapido book is mentioned - Rachel has a
copy ‘heavily underlined’ on her shelves, so it’s a deliberate homage.
others from my files






I recently reread it; with trepidation, I loved it just as much. Also enjoyed the Rachel Incident.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your blog, so many fantastic recommendations.
Jill
It is always a worry, isn't it, going back to a book you loved - will it not stand up, will it disappoint?
DeleteBut this one triumphed. And yes, Rachel Incident another good book.
The rugby shirt dress doesn't sound too far fetched to me depending when in the 1960s it is. If you've got my 1960s book, one of the chapter frontispieces is of a Mary Quant minidress in around 1966 that's clearly just a slightly extended rugby shirt (jersey style dresses, as in the garment rather than the fabric, were one of her signatures), and I think rugby shirts did run a bit longer back then as well.
ReplyDeleteMy mum is actually a very good violinist but these days she calls herself primarily a fiddle player because she now predominantly plays folk music rather than classical music.
Also, knitting home-production was a HUGE thing at this time, it's called piece working and literally every knitwear designer had to rely on it to meet their orders. Machine knitting had become widely accessible by the 1960s (again see 1960s book for some Mondrian dresses available via a 1966 monthly magazine specifically for people with a home-knitting machine). Bill Gibb, who was famous for his spectacular knits (co-designed by Kaffe Fassett) had a lot of difficulty finding manufacturers/knitters who were prepared to tackle the challenge of producing his gorgeously but ludicrously intricate knits. It was a key source of income for a lot of homeworkers, especially housewives, as you could have the Knitmaster running while you did your housework, and you'd get paid by the piece (hence piecework).
Lots to comment on in this post! You can tell the author was very much alive and observant in the 60s.
Thanks Daniel - I should've made it clearer that it wasn't the existence of the rugby shirt dress I doubted (see my magazine picture above, after all) but her wearing it for a university interview. Katherine, the heroine, was quite quirky in her way, but she was also very middle-class, well-brought-up, going to a Good Girls' School. Both her school and her mother would've said 'you can't go to an interview like that'. I was applying for university not that many years later, and I would never have worn that, and obviously I saw many other young women doing the same, both at school and at the interview sessions, and literally no-one would have been dressed in a short rugby shirt dress.
DeleteFascinating details about the knitting - there's quite a lot about it in this book.
At a work event once I fell into conversation with the Knitting Editor of a big women's magazine of the time, and she had fascinating things to say about their test knitters, and about the popuarity of the patterns.
I did quite a lot of knitting myself - and for myself. People would say 'you should sell them' but there was no way I would be paid enough to justify the effort. I loved a challenging pattern - do you remember Patricia Roberts? All the bobbles! I knitted one once that had dozens of 3-d bows worked into it - I'm not a bows person, I did it because it was hard.
Kaffe Fassett's designs were incredibly beautiful, but they didn't have hard stitches, it was just a matter of keeping your colours and patterns straight.
I think you would enjoy this book for the fashion details... there was more i didn't use, including tight velvet trousers tucked into knee-high boots.
I had one of those Rugby dresses when I was fifteen or so. I remember it was a bit tricky to wear while climbing on the bus.
Delete... but would you have gone for an interview wearing it?
DeleteIn 1970? My parents wouldn't have let me out the door in anything less than a suit with a floppy little silk tie.
DeleteSo glad it wasn't just me and my parents. In those days everyone had a view on what your wore, with some chance of imposing that on you. I would not have been quite so dictatorial with my daughter, though occasionally would offer wholly unwanted advice. I would say 'is that what people wear for interviews these days?' Cringe.
DeleteWhy cringe?
DeleteThe people doing the interviewing were much more likely to be close to your age and to have similar attitudes to you, so your opinion was probably closer to theirs
I have made that point many times with young people. My 'cringe' was because of the wording of the question, which was rather pass-agg
DeleteLook, Moira, I have to come back to you on this - as Daniel points out - there is a valid distinction between the violin and the fiddle. When my daughter started learning, it was the fiddle, because she was learning in the folk rather than the classical tradition. So if the genius child is playing classical music then references to fiddle playing are just plain wrong. There, got that off my chest. Now I will have to read the book! Always been intrigued by the great title. Chrissie
ReplyDeleteTee hee. One of the many things I LOVE about the blog is that I don't know which random items will get people worked up! It's a safe space here, all views welcome....
DeleteI think you'll like the book.
I don't think I would like Roger at all, and Jonathan sounds an awful brat, although he'd make for entertaining reading. BTW I like fiddle music better than classical violin (although that can be lovely of course). Orange Blossom Special is a favorite, and Celtic reels and jigs.
DeleteI haven't thought of OBS in years, just had to go and listen to it. One of my favourite CDs (which of course I still use, being old) is Appalachia Waltz, with Yo Yo Ma, Edgar Meyer and Mark O'Connor doing some incredible music.
DeleteI think you can get AI to "create" your own pictures, so if you really want to you could make "this would look very well worn with the hat from the top picture" a picture. Or you may be like me and turn off every AI device IT tries to push on you, in which case, we're in a (probably lost) War for Civilisation!
ReplyDelete"the copy I have now is not my original one, but a much later reprint – someone kept mine"...and perhaps you kept someone else's.
I've probably quoted it before, but it's worth repeating: Edwin Arlington Robinson's Captain Craig lamented
"I might go back a little to the days
When I had hounds and credit, and grave friends
To borrow my books and set wet glasses on them"
At least you got them back! I thought
It'll be a cold day in Hell before I get into that!
DeleteNO, my copy is mine, I NEVER keep others' books! I very rarely borrow books from people these days, vanishingly unlikely.
Nice quote.
Have you read - Juggling, Temples of Delight, The Travelling Hornplayer? All just as brilliant with various characters popping in and out of different books, covering many of the same events from different points of view, and linking characters in odd ways.
ReplyDeleteThat was me.
DeleteI think I loved Brother too much - I read a couple more of hers, but none of them matched up....
DeleteI loathed this book when I read it recently. The lead character may have been unofficially adopted by the Bohemian family but she had a family, or at least a mother, of her own. I thought she was horrible to her and sneered at her all the way through. The men in the Bohemian family were ghastly, particularly Jacob. I found it odd that this young woman had no female friends outside the arty tribe. Perhaps, she did in Italy ...the Italian boyfriend was a piece of work too! Jane was partly a sympathetic character but a lot of the time I just felt sorry for her.
ReplyDeleteOh dear - I'm sorry it didn't do it for you.
DeleteThat one pic reminds me of Peter Max--a blast from the past!
DeleteDidn't mean to reply to the comment, although I might feel the same way if I read the book. I remember Hugh Laurie remarking that he liked the rudeness of the British (as opposed to Americans? would he really hate Canadians?). I didn't understand that at all, although it reminded me of the quote that "a gentleman is never rude unintentionally" and also of Lord Peter Wimsey at a Bohemian party saying to his partner that they should be leaving or "we shall all be getting polite."
DeleteI had to look up Peter Max, and then thought 'but who does he look like?' before realizing you meant the fashion pic was in his style 😀😀😀
DeleteThe delight of books is that we all react differently - something can catch us in the right way or the wrong way.
I love talking to people who have moved here and asking them what they find strange about they way the locals react - in a good or bad way. It's always surprising. The main thing is that we should all have some tolerance and try to work with the differences!
There is a self-admiring upper-class thing in books about the lovely eccentric poshos - and they often come over to me as flat-out rude and unpleasant, and I am not amused...
Now I will HAVE to read it to decide which side of the fence I am on! Chrissie
DeleteYes you will! We look forward to your sharing your opinion
DeleteThis is a very informative and well-written article. I like how you kept the tone friendly and simple, making it easy for anyone to follow. Content like this is always appreciated and worth reading. Sridevi Panel Chart
ReplyDelete