The Dancing Bear by Peter Dickinson
published 1972
Where do the books come from?
Well. In this case, it would be hard to invent the CiB connections.
A theatrical mystery – Come to Paddington Fair by Derek
Smith – featured a stuffed bear as part of a stage set (and part of the
crime) and I was very pleased with the picture I found.
Stage
Door Enquiries - theatrical mystery and prop guns from Derek Smith
Blogfriend Christine Harding posted a comment
considering the incidence of bears in books, and of course the readers surged
forward to add to her suggestions, and a good time was had by all.
This one was mentioned (anon comment, but I think maybe
Sovay : corrected later: it was actually Roger Allen. See comments below) and I idly looked it up – I’m a big fan of Peter
Dickinson’s crime books, and have also read some of his
children’s books, but not this one. And so I discovered that the book is set in
the time of the Emperor Justinian, 558 CE, and starts out in the vari-named Byzantium. Bingo!
This was all gone over on the blog last year – see this
post
for an obscure historical novel, and here for Robert
Graves’ Count Belisarius. So obviously I had to track
down a copy and read it. It is also true that I was utterly fascinated by the
idea of dancing bears when I was a child, and I would have LOVED this book if
I’d ever come across it.
One thing to get out of the way: to modern eyes the idea of
a dancing bear, in captivity for the entertainment of humans, is shocking and
cruel, and would not be tolerated today, and I have no argument with that
(though I don’t really understand why it is different from, say, riding horses for
entertainment, possibly putting them in danger?) But I am going to say that
this book is set 1500 years ago, and there is a lot worse going on, including
the fact that the main character, Sylvester, is a slave. So we are going to go with the flow and accept
it for what it was.
Sylvester is a bear-keeper and clerk in a wealthy household
in Byzantium, and a friend to the daughter of the house, the Lady Ariadne.
There is an attack on the city by Huns, and Ariadne is carried off. After a lot
of activity, Sylvester finds himself with Holy John – a saint and mystic who
usually sits on top of a pillar – and his beloved bear Bubba, outside the city
walls, off to find and rescue Ariadne. The book follows their very complex adventures.
I enjoyed it hugely, and as I say just regret not having read it earlier.
Peter Dickinson died 10
years ago, but luckily his website still survives, I’m guessing his family look
after it:
--and it is, btw, a model author site in my important
opinion.
This is part of Dickinson’s comments on the book:
I chose the period of the great Emperor
Justinian because one year when I was at Eton a last-minute emergency teacher
had had to be found to teach us ancient history, and he announced on arrival
that the only period he could teach was that of Justinian — five hundred years
later than the time of the great classic writers that was all we were supposed
to take an interest in…
Some of the book is true and some is fiction – the author
says he invented the specific raid by the Huns, and later found there had been
one exactly then. The characters shine out – Holy John is a hoot and a half –
and the bear is absolutely wonderful, and her relationship with Sylvester a
delight. The book is packed with action and adventure but also very funny and
charming at times.
There are extraordinary scenes such as the ones where the
bear is asked to walk over ill people, which was thought to make them better.
‘She danced to and fro across
the old woman, stepping on her several times, while the old woman shrieked and
hooted and [her son] yelled to his friends to come and see his mother being
killed, or cured, as the case might be.’
There are great descriptions of the bear dancing, of
travelling, of hunting (there is a splendid ‘demon huntress’).
Another recent community post was this one:
Compass
directions, a children’s classic, and is North best?
which began with a reference to the children’s book, Stuart
Little. I had a complaint or difficulty with that story, and feel I can say
(spoiler-free) that The Dancing Bear did not have the same lack of resolution.
Dickinson’s style, and the drive of the book, reminded me of Geoffrey Trease who also wrote excellent historical (and modern YA) novels
In the original comments I mentioned a bear anecdote from Nancy
Mitford’s Love in a Cold Climate, and here it is:
‘Sadie was telling how some
people, before their babies are born, gaze at Greuze so that the babies shall
look like it, and she said “You never know about these things, because when I
was a little girl in Suffolk a baby was born in the village with a bear’s head,
and what do you think? Exactly nine months before a dancing bear had been in
that neighbourhood.” So Vict. said “But I can quite understand that, I always
think bears are simply terribly attractive”, and Sadie gave the most tremendous
jump I ever saw and said, “You awful child, that’s not what I mean at all”’.
Pictures from the turn of the century, France &
England.
Another noted children’s author, Michael Morpurgo, also wrote a book called The Dancing Bear, published in 1994, which didn’t grab me - rather unfairly, I didn't like it because it had an unconvincing contemporary setting. It sounded like Heidi to begin with, an orphan girl with a gruff grandfather somewhere like a French mountain village? Maybe Swiss? Becomes friend and protector to a bearcub, Bruno. Then a film crew is coming, so I thought maybe 1930s. The director wore a purple fedora -
- I admired that idea very much. Then there was a startling
mention of George Michael, and the revelation that the film was a pop video. I
thought the story sat awkwardly among these different aspects, and it didn’t
work for me though others plainly love it.
Go to the comments on that previous post to find more books featuring bears.
Country Circus Troupe with Dancing Bear from Balkans, on T… | Flickr
File:Carte postale, Poussay (Vosges), Nomades montreurs d'ours.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
File:English
dancing bear.jpg - Wikimedia Commons



The character names are hilarious (especially Bubba as a female)!
ReplyDeleteWell Bubba didn't have any modern-day US implications in the sixth century!
DeleteSomehow I doubt whether Bubba had any existence at all in the 6th century!
DeleteWhy shouldn't it? People have always named animals with that kind of name..
DeleteMy only experience with Bubba is as a name for a good-old-boy type of American male.
DeleteI think it's common everywhere to give nicknames and pet names made of two syllables pushed together. A quick Google search also pulled it up as a word for water among indigenous Australians, and several men in families of Anglo-Saxon lords in 8th 7th & 6th century Northumbria and other parts of what's now England.
DeleteAlong of course with plenty of the Bubbas you describe...
I'm not the Anon who mentioned this book, though it sounds interesting - I have read some of Peter Dickinson's work for young readers, but as far as I recall only the "Weathermonger" series. I did mention Aubrey and Maturin in one of Patrick O'Brien's books, walking through the Pyrenees disguised as a dancing bear and its keeper respectively - the English dancing bear photo could be them, if photography had been around c. 1812!
ReplyDeleteModern concerns about dancing bears focus on the methods used to obtain the bears and train them to "dance" - not exactly humane by all accounts.
Sovay
We'll have to see if someone else claims credit!
DeleteYes I remember the O'Brien reference - someone else has suggested that online.
I don't at all argue that bears are NOT treated badly - but I am always mystified by what seems to be acceptable treatment of animals. I am not a strong animal-lover, or fighter for animal rights, but I am interested in the logic of it. And do believe that our treatment of animals reflects on us.
Human/animal relations are so complicated and full of illogicalities and doublethink. In the West there’s that common perception of a “special relationship” with horses and dogs in particular, which goes hand in hand with an assumption (which may or may not be justified) that they can be trained without resorting to the kind of brutality that’s needed to subdue and dominate a powerful wild animal. Which is presumably why horse and dog acts are still allowed in circuses in the UK.
DeleteSovay
Yes, it's a point of view. But I'm not sure how rigorous it is
DeleteWasn't there a scandal at the time of the last Olympics, when one of the UK equestrian competitors was found to be ill-treating her horses in training? And no doubt she wasn't the only one - so not rigorous at all, I suspect! I'm not sure it's worth even trying to apply logic.
DeleteSovay
You're right, and I'd forgotten that. I'm sure she did behave badly, but it was also all rather sad because she had had a long distinguished career, and it seemed to be a momentary fail rather than a life of mistreating the horses...
DeleteI haven't read Dickinson before, Moira, I must admit. I know I should. I have to say, I do like historical fiction, and this one takes place against such an interesting backdrop! And now you've got me thinking about bears and other animals (that aren't pets) in crime fiction. Hmm.....
ReplyDeleteOh Margot go for it - you would do such a good post!
DeleteAnd I think you would like Peter Dickinson's crime books
I think I was the Anon who mentioned The Dancing Bear. I sometimes turn up as me. sometimes as Anon and sometimes as Rawdon Crawley and forget to check and correct which. If I remember rightly, Ariadne falls in the cub Bubba's pit as a baby and Bubba does not harm her. In gratitude her father does not mutilate Bubba, which is the way dancing bears are usually treated.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to look at horses, Robert Bontine Cunninghame Graham, who I mentioned in connexion with South America, was an admirer and enthusiast of horses and felt guilt for the rest of his life for his part in recruiting them from South America in WWI
- Roger
Thanks - I might have guessed. Rawdon doesn''t turn up so often these days!
DeleteYes, the bear was kind to the baby and Sylvester protected her from the worst treatment that bears got.
I do remember the man with many names, but I'm not sure I can face being sad about horses.
Morpurgo (again) did WarHorse, which I quite liked but left me dry-eyed. On the other hand his Private Peaceful (about court-martialling and executing young soldiers) destroyed me. Humans over animals every time.
Dickinson also wrote poems including (as far as I know) the only Sonnet on the Sonnet on the Sonnet
ReplyDelete'Scorn not the sonnet' (Wordsworth)
Scorn not the sonnet on the sonnet, critic;
It is a bank where poets love to lie
And praise each other's ingenuity
In finding such a form. The analytic
Reader may stigmatise as parasitic
The mirror-image of a mystery,
The echo of lost voices, find it dry,
And intellectually paralytic.
Yet 'tis a child of Fancy, light and live,
A fragile veil of Nature, scarcely worn
(Of Wordsworth's two, of Shakespeare's none, survive);
Empty not then the vials of scorn upon it.
Nor, since we're on the subject, should you scorn
The sonnet on the sonnet on the sonnet.
I look forward to a sequel.
That one has maybe lost me... very post-modern.
DeleteMy favourite quote from Dickinson is other end of the spectrum:
“Nobody who has not spent a whole sunny afternoon under his bed rereading a pile of comics left over from the previous holidays has any real idea of the meaning of intellectual freedom.”
The details may vary for time place and gender, but the idea is sound.
You're overcomplicating! Wordsworth wrote a Sonnet on the Sonner beginning "Scorn not the sonnet..." There are quite a few sonnets on the sonnet on the 'net, in fact. Dickinson saw the next stage!
DeleteYears ago a first copy of the Beano was found and sold for a vast sum of money. All over that country middle-aged children probably left the newspaper reports on it where the aged parents who had once cleared out "all this rubbish" would notice them.
Nope, that is still complicated, and it's not I who is making it so 😀. I am stepping away from the sonnet.
DeleteI've always thought it surprising that Sonnet isn't used as a first name for girls. When I write my Clothes in Books novels, I will have a character called Sonnet, and I will have someone say 'Scorn not the sonnet...'
I like that idea about the comics and their aged owners, and feel Peter D would have liked it too.
Horses (and dogs) have been domesticated for so long - it IS different I feel from training a wild animal. I think I have a blind spot as far as historical fiction is concerned. I hardly ever enjoy it. Chrissie (once a horse-mad teenager).
ReplyDeleteWith dogs at least, animals with the more "domesticated" traits have been bred to strengthen those traits, sometimes intentionally by humans but often just because those dogs were
Delete...living together close to humans. Marty
DeleteI too have difficulties with historical fiction no matter how well written and researched it is. And I know some of it is very good, just not my cup of tea.
DeleteI will politely accept your POV Chrissie! The way people (not you obv) talk about their beloved pets and animals always reminds me of nice southerners in Civil War times saying that they are really kind to their slaves, and the slaves really love them, and would not be suited for any other life etc. I will say again - I dont much mind about animal rights so long as they are not treated cruelly, I just wonder about the people who say they love them. Do they listen to themselves?
DeleteI enjoy some, not all, historical fiction very much - and entirely separately will always say (ie repeating myself on the blog every time) that I learned vast amounts of history through teenage reading of very average books. They fixed facts and dates and a timeline in my head, for which I am ery grateful. (I am very good on history or dates rounds in pub quizzes, you want me on your team)
I can't really see the parallels between pet owners and slaveowners. There's nothing intrinsically wrong in having pets, unless they're actually wild animals that don't belong in people's homes. Owning slaves, on the other hand, is an abomination. Slaves had the right and the ability to lead their own lives in freedom, but that's not the case with domestic animals. Pet owners can be pretty silly about their pets, but often pets are family, maybe the only family a person has. (And sometimes provide better companionship than the human families do.)
DeleteI can see why that's all satisfactory for the humans. But why should the animals have to live their lives to suit the humans, and be 'trained' = controlled?
DeleteIf you're asking what right do humans have to lord it over all creation, that's a good question that touches too much on religious matters for me to try to answer! I don't think animals have the same way of thinking about freedom as humans do, if they think about it at all. I'd say that being given food and shelter, even with the catch of having to work, isn't any worse than the world of natural selection/survival of the fittest. I agree that animals should be given respect as fellow creatures, but I don't see them as equals to humans. I know some people do, and say that humans are just animals themselves, and similarities are being pointed out all the time, but I just don't agree. Even when I'm at my silliest about my pets I don't think of them as human.
DeleteI don't remotely see animals as equal to humans, and I value all human lives a long way above any animal. But the keeping of pets & other animals seems to raise serious questions for me, as much as eating animals raises questions for vegetarians. (which I am not, and never will be, and have no problem with eating them)
DeleteI guess this one of those things we'll never agree about!
DeleteWe all have our own views, and that's how it should be 😀
DeleteAfraid this is a non-literary reference, but an earworm/Proustian Madeline for me is Alan Price singing Randy Newman's 'Simon Smith and his Amazing Dancing Bear'. I mostly recall it from listening to Ed "Stewpot" Stewart's Junior Choice with my mother and sister on the radio in the 1960s (along with Puff the Magic Dragon and the Mice in the Windmill in Old Amsterdam). No doubt, some (slightly) younger readers will recall Fozzie Bear singing the song on The Muppet Show in the 1970s.
ReplyDeleteOh so glad you mentioned that, I wish I'd thought of it!
DeleteIt was always a great favourite with me too. Randy Newman is a genius.
I also remember reading an early work of rock criticism, by Nik Cohn, who described the song as coming from nowhere and bearing no relation to any other song - and being struck by the idea that you could write about pop songs in such an interesting way, taking them seriously but being as entertaining as the songs (that was quite surprising back in the day, trivial now)
I've just been looking up Nik Cohn on Wiki - very entertaining. He turns up just often enough in my personal history with popular music - that book (which I remember something from about once a month), Rock Dreams & Frankie GTH, Saturday Night Fever...
I hadn't realised before looking at Wikipedia how important the song seems to have been to Randy Newman in finding his voice. The other thing which strikes me on reading the lyrics is how dark it could be sung if you wanted to - a bit like the difference between Liza Minelli's and Jane Horrocks's versions of the song Cabaret
DeleteThe song refers to needing to borrow a coat, and the two lines "They'll love us, won't they? They feed us, don't they?" indicate that the answer is not necessarily going to be yes. Oddly, having Fozzie Bear singing "Won't they" and "Don't they" brings that out well.
Yes, now I've looked at the Wiki page and lyrics, following in your footsteps, and totally agree.
DeleteThere is something about the song....
I'd love you to be on my quiz team, Moira! Chrissie
ReplyDeleteIt would be fun wouldn't it? One day...
Delete