The Man in the Moonlight by Helen McCloy

The Man in the Moonlight by Helen McCloy

published 1940




 

[A young woman is talking about leaving Europe for America in the late 1930s]

 

“We who left Austria at the last moment were only allowed to take two hundred schillings of Austrian money and five hundred schillings of foreign money—a hundred and forty dollars altogether. My father and I had a small sum—a few thousands in your money. None of our relatives were remaining in Austria. Should we leave the money we couldn’t take with us to the new régime? We thought not. So we squandered it. Of course it was hard to waste money we would soon need for food and shelter. But what else could we do? My father bought books and phonograph records; I bought clothes. We were afraid jewels or anything negotiable would be confiscated at the border. But they could hardly object to our taking our clothes with us! Or our books and records. The only valuable thing I got was a fur coat which I sold in Prague to pay my passage to America. Everything else was quite frivolous and useless and perishable. The sheerest stockings that run if you look at them—the palest suéde gloves that become soiled if you wear them ten minutes—the finest handkerchiefs that any public laundry will tear to ribbons in the washing.”

 

comments: Her very smart clothes have made this young woman an object of suspicion at the university where she landed up. A very interesting phenomenon and a new one to me.

One of the university women says ‘I don’t see how she can afford those clothes she wears. I’m sure I can’t afford stockings as sheer as that—and yet she’s supposed to be a penniless refugee!” – this particular person suspects immorality rather than her being a secret agent.

[top picture shows upmarket European fashions from 1938, complete with gloves, fur stole and stockings]

And then there is this:

The morbid elegance of black tweed and white angora suited her black and white beauty. Basil realized suddenly how rarely he had seen her in colors. She belonged to a world of European women who had clung to black for nearly twenty years as if it were scarcely worth the trouble to go out of mourning between wars.

Chatain Sport Angora Blouse Pattern #3004 | Knitting Patterns

 


I do like Helen McCloy and have covered a number of her books here - tag below.

This was an early entry in the Basil Willing series, and has significant implications for him: One of those cases where if you’ve read later books, you know that a certain character isn’t killer or victim. Though honestly, I don’t think you’d be in much doubt.

Events are taking place in a small serious university in Manhattan, close to one of the rivers: it’s slightly hard to imagine, but you certainly get the atmosphere of an academic institution of the time. The date is important: the USA has not entered WW2, but everyone is very politically aware, and there are the refugees from Europe – many of whom don’t feel able to trust one another. Are some of them Nazi plants?

There is a Dr Konradi, a very clever scientist, involved – apparently – in cancer research. But why would that be of interest to covert forces, why would anyone want either to steal or stop his research? Well, trust no-one.

And he is the first victim. Basil Willing, psychiatrist and sleuth, tries to find out what’s going on, with his usual confidently-stated psychological certainties. I wonder if they were as unconvincing in 1940 as they sound now? You certainly wouldn’t ever want to convict anyone on Basil’s mind game sayso.

There is an extended Word Association section – ie characters/suspects are given a word and asked to respond instantly with the first word in their head. This is a trope I strongly dislike in crime stories, and in this one she actually gives the reaction times for each word. Tchah. Gladys Mitchell’s Mrs Bradley always prone to that - but it gives you a way to skip a few pages.

Even the sainted Agatha has Poirot giving it a go in the early short story The Tragedy of Marsden Manor (collected in Poirot Investigates). By the time she got to Towards Zero (1944), a word association takes place offpage, and is used to stitch up an innocent person to the strong disapproval of Superintendent Battle and one assumes Agatha herself. No more nonsense there.

The university seems an unattractive and rather corrupt place…. We are in no doubt of the importance of money, and the strange things it can buy.

There is a comic knockabout psychologist (ie not psychiatrist like Basil) who is doing awful experiments on his students and even his poor baby. He is also a great one for lie detector tests, which are much discussed in the book. Interestingly, there is a Fr Brown short story, the Mistake of the Machine, in which author GK Chesterton warns why you can’t go too far with lie detectors. It’s in The Wisdom of Fr Brown published in 1914, though the incident is said to have taken place 20 years before. This early lie detector was pointed out to me by blogfriend Roger Allen a while back in the comments: I’ve no memory of why it arose, and the comments on the blog are impossible to search.

Also some strange views and reactions around epilepsy.

All that said, it was an enjoyable and easy read, and as ever Basil’s final exposition of what had happened, and of the clues, (particularly the clues which did not involve him ‘knowing’ how people 'always' think) was good fun.

Kate over at Cross-Examining Crime has done an excellent review of this book, with a much more detailed look at the plot – I highly recommend

The Man in the Moonlight (1940) by Helen McCloy – crossexaminingcrime

Comments

  1. Basil Willing's an interesting character, I think, Moira. Or perhaps it's that I think it's interesting to look at the way we view psychology now versus the way Willing approaches it. And I think you know that I have a real soft spot for academic settings in my fiction. That prejudice about clothing caught my attention, too; I actually think people still do that...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, he's a good choice as sleuth in some ways, even if we bring our modern views to his psychology!

      Delete
  2. Nit-picking at someone who was clearly in a dangerous and stressful situation but - if she had to spend her money on clothes (which in the circumstances may have to last her for some time) why not go for sturdy and hard-wearing stockings and gloves and handkerchiefs, rather than frivolous and useless and perishable?

    I know I've read something by Helen McCloy and found Basil Willing distinctly irritating, but I may well add this to the list - always interesting to read about that interim period in America when the war was brewing up but the US wasn't yet directly involved.

    Fluff from the white angora is going to get all over the black tweed ...

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I was at college we used to put angora jumpers in the landlady”# fridge overnight because we’d read that it stopped the fluff coming off!

      Delete
    2. Christine Harding8 January 2026 at 13:18

      Done it wrong again!

      Delete
    3. Sovay: Yes, I felt the same - it seemed mean to cavil at someone else's unimaginable trials, but it didn't quite make sense did it?
      Christine: I've heard that - does it work?

      Delete
    4. She had money to burn and wanted to use it up, so bought the most expensive things she could.

      It does seem like she could have got suede gloves that were not pale, however, or things that appeared ordinary but were really top quality. But then--do we know what was on offer in Austria in the late 30s? Perhaps all the expensive things were simply frivolities for officers to buy for their mistresses!

      Delete
    5. Yes - it is hard not to sound judge-y. It just seems that there are plenty of expensive things that are practical and hard-wearing.
      I always remember Linda in Pursuit of Love who was nice and warm because Fabrice had sent her off with fur: 'Linda had an evening coat, a sort of robe from head to foot, of white fox lined with white ermine. She wrapped herself in this for dinner, and suffered less than we others did. In the daytime she either wore her sable coat and a pair of black velvet boots lined with sable to match, or lay on the sofa tucked up in an enormous mink bedspread lined with white velvet quilting.'

      Delete
    6. Yes! Fabrice said the war would be very cold!

      Delete
    7. Christine Harding9 January 2026 at 09:07

      Moira, I don’t remember the angora in the fridge working particular. My jumper always felt cold and damp when I took it out, and once it warmed up it still shed pink fluff over everything. Maybe it should have gone into a polythene bag,

      Delete
    8. Linda on Fabrice: "It used to make me so laugh when Fabrice said he was getting me all these things because they would be useful in the war, the war would be fearfully cold he always said, but I see now how right he was."
      Christine, that does sound rather unappealing, I think I'd have taken chances on the fluff.
      I once worked in one of those upmarket 'modom' dress shops that I do like encountering in fiction. One of the very low-rent jobs I had to do was take sellotape and use it to remove fluff and lint from the clothes...

      Delete
    9. Re: the young woman in the book – I’ve also reminded myself that she and her father probably couldn’t count on being able to take anything beyond what they could themselves carry unaided, which would rule out things like Linda’s mink bedspread; and as she points out, obvious easily-portable high-value items such as jewellery and small antiques would almost certainly be confiscated. So doing my best to rein in the judginess …

      IIRC Linda’s quite happy to suffer ‘less than we others did’; there’s no indication that she shares, no invitation to a shivering relative to join her under the enormous mink bedspread, or borrow the sable coat whilst she’s wearing the white fox. I don’t find Linda nearly as enchanting as practically everyone in “The Pursuit of Love” seems to (and note from your posts that you don’t either, CiB).

      Sovay

      Delete
    10. And having reined in the judginess I immediately got judgy again, albeit in a different direction!

      Re the angora - I could imagine that if a live angora rabbit, still wearing its fur, was cold, it would be less likely to shed; could it be that this influenced people to think a jumper would react in the same way?

      Sovay

      Delete
    11. I too find Linda less than enchanting. I guess she was supposed to have the kind of personal charm that made selfish or thoughtless behavior more palatable, but it never came across to me. I suspect my values aren't the same as the Mitfords' anyway!

      Delete
    12. Interesting question about Linda: I think Fanny is meant to be enchanted by her (though even she has her moments) but I think Nancy was quite subtly showing that she attracted love, but was wholly selfish. Right from childhood, when she took over Fanny's Christmas presents from her 'wicked' parents. She most certainly wouldn't be sharing the lovely furs...

      Delete
    13. Would you say Nancy incorporated character traces of her real sister Diana into her portrait of Linda? As you write: "she attracted love, but was wholly selfish". That does sound like Diana, doe's it?

      Delete
    14. I do think so, yes. Nancy wasn't perfect, but she was warm-hearted and I always felt Diana (quite apart from political views) had ice in her heart.

      Delete
  3. I have read them all and they are never less than an enjoyable read, and some are excellent. I don't remember this as one of my favourites. Wouldn't care to be psychoanalysed by Basil (yes, all that has dated rather), but his heart is in the right place. Chrissie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent description, Chrissie, Basil definitely a charmer.
      I am working my way through the books (not in order) and must check the list to see which ones I haven't yet got to. I was looking for this one for a while, it wasn't easy to find.

      Delete
  4. I love to read dated psychology because it reminds me that today's mind-reading may go the same way! Psychology doesn't have a history like other "sciences", Basil Willing's has as much chance of being true or helpful as the stuff we're being fed now. Why not revive some dead theories and gurus and repackage them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! What seems obvious and true at one time will go in and out of favour.
      I've always liked the character in Miss Pym Disposes (J Tey) who has attended a talk on Psychology, and explains why she prefers Anatomy as a subject: 'To listen to it is charming, but to work at it would be very foolish. An idea today may be nonsense tomorrow, but a clavicle is a clavicle for all time. You see?’
      It seems like a very valid point.

      Delete
    2. Quite a far-sighted point. Freud was very much the darling of the chattering classes in the 30s and 40s and his ideas very much en vogue. One might have made an interesting dinner party guest but also be a totaly ass with some advanced Psychology blabla

      Delete
  5. Recently I read a movie review which mentioned how some Hollywood studios made anti-Nazi films before the US entered the war and were accused of "warmongering" by conservatives. (Not that the Nazis were doing any warmongering themselves, oh dear no.) 1939's Confessions of a Nazi Spy was based on a real-life trial of a Nazi Spy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's an interesting time in US history isn't it? The film-makers had to tread a fine line. And Joseph Kennedy sr, US Amassdaor to the UK, among many other people, was very much against the US getting involved in the War.

      Delete
    2. My father grew up on the west coast of the US, near at least one navy base and shipyards. It was apparent to everyone that the US *would* enter the war. The yards were bustling, hiring people in multiple shifts round the clock. The official line was that ships were being built or refurbished to provide to US allies, but no one thought it would stop there. The only question was when/under what provocation those ships would sail.

      As to the elegant refugee--some of my friends' grandmothers would certainly recognize her, if they were not actually her!

      Delete
    3. I think this may have been one of the times when anti-fascists were drawn to the communists, who didn't yet have the stigma they'd get in the Cold War. Some of the actors investigated by the House Committee on Un-American Activities may have had their "Red" experiences then. Interestingly, the HUAC already existed at that time and opposed anti-Nazi propaganda. There was a thought that movies and such shouldn't be "attacking" a "friendly nation"! Hard to imagine Hitler's Germany being called a friendly nation....

      Delete
    4. That's fascinating Dame E - I wouldn't have been aware of that. I thought there was sufficient opposition in USA that it wouldnt have been such a certain thing. Many people were certain in the UK during the second half of the 1930s that war was bound to happen (people signing up for the territorials/reserves so they would be in place when war broke out) but we were a lot closer to the action.
      Marty - that is complicated and interesting. And presumably people were not always completely honest afterwards about what had gone on before the war.
      And there is always that chilling phrase 'premature anti-fascism'.

      Delete
    5. Have you read Margery Allingham's The Oaken Heart? She wrote about her life in an English village just before and after the outbreak of war.

      Delete
    6. I wonder if the government gave some "hints" to industries that ships and planes would be needed soon. I think FDR realized the threat from Germany at least, and wanted us to enter the war much sooner than we did. There have even been theories that he "allowed" Pearl Harbor to be bombed in order to get the country behind him--IMO that's a stretch, but there was a very strong isolationist feeling in the country. Not everyone thought that war was a certainty, they may have been foolish but they were in earnest.

      Delete
    7. Didn't Churchill have something of the same problem, before he was PM, of getting the government to prepare for war? I remember a movie on this subject, I think it was The Gathering Storm. Don't know how far it was based on facts, but it had a marvelous cast, worth watching.

      Delete
    8. I'm doing a Columbo here, I know! That phrase "premature anti-fascism" is indeed chilling, IMO nonsensical. Anti-fascism can never be premature, in fact I wish there were more of it around today.

      Delete
    9. I should have said it was apparent to everyone who lived near enough to the shipyards to get hired there, or to see the comings and goings! My dad was too young to be hired by the gummint, but he worked civilian construction jobs that were going begging because the men who would normally have taken them were instead taking shipyard jobs. After Pearl Harbor, his high school teachers worked second shifts in the yards.

      Delete
    10. Marty - I’ve also read about the conservative accusations of warmongering against Hollywood studios – fuelled by anti-Semitism as many of the studio bosses and executives were of Jewish background and could be depicted as part of the alleged great international cabal of Jewish businessmen that was plotting to take control of the world. IIRC the Nazi propaganda in America seems to have been mainly directed at keeping America OUT of the war, rather than actively recruiting them to join the Axis powers, so I suppose they could claim not to be warmongering in that specific sphere; really interesting to know that nevertheless the US government was actively preparing to join the war.

      In Britain in the 1930s it was acceptable, and almost fashionable in some circles, to be strongly Socialist – even to the point of joining the Communist Party. Angela Thirkell, of all unlikely people, depicts Communists as socially acceptable and Fascists not so! It sounds like this was not the case in the US …

      Sovay

      Delete
    11. This is a fascinating conversation, thanks all for your input.

      Delete
    12. Sovay, I agree that Nazis in the US were mainly weren't technically warmongering (although they were probably hate-mongering). I meant that the Nazis in Europe were behaving in a most warlike way!

      Delete
  6. The most chilling and frightening - chilling and frightening however you look at it - psychological experiment I know is recounted by its perpetrator, Stanley Milgram, in his book Obedience to Authority.

    It's odd how immediately hostile people often are to psychologists: Skinner's Box is infamous as a Mad Experiment on his daughter. In reality it was a comfortable carry-cot the baby could look out of with games they could play if they wanted included.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Whoops
    - Roger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I studied some psychology at university, as a subsid subject where before I had only done serious Maths and science. I was horrified by how casual and unchecked everything was. I can quite see how you can't have control groups in many kinds of experiments, but the standards seemed highly un-rigorous, and I had a very suspicious view of many of the things we were taught. I would say many items we were told about are no longer seen as serious, and many of them been completely discredited, and I'm not a bit surprised. I kept saying 'did anyone try to repeat this experiment? Has anyone reproduced these results?'
      My favourite story was that when Pavlov's dogs demonstrated that they knew their food was coming, Pavlov's first thought was that they must be psychic. Mind you at least he checked and discovered otherwise. Half the experiments I read about seemed on the level of his first conclusion.
      Can you remember why we were talking about lie detectors and Fr Brown on a previous occasion?

      Delete
    2. https://clothesinbooks.blogspot.com/2023/05/the-deadly-truth-by-helen-mccloy.html

      Searching via Google popped it right up; in fact, it was a Googlewhack.

      Delete
    3. Wow - well done you, thank you. And it was Helen McCloy then, which makes a kind of sense.
      I very much enjoyed reading through post and comments - splendid variety, and I liked the young woman coming downstairs in her hostess gown...

      Delete
    4. Thanks, Dame Eleanor. Google rides again! It is my favourite search engine for random subjects.
      On the present reliability of lie detectors: Aldrich Ames, the CIA agent who worked for Russia, was told to "just relax" if he took one, and it worked.
      It's interesting to see attitudes to psychologists. Jean Piaget was thought to be cold-bloodedly examining and testing his children. It turned out he thought of is as a way to get people to pay him for playing with them for hours every day!
      -Roger

      Delete
    5. The only problem I sometimes have with psychologists is when they claim their theories are The Only Answer! Freudians have often been guilty of that attitude so I tend to discount characters who explain everything in Freud's terms. Not that his studies weren't worthwhile, it's just that others have also had worthwhile ideas. I remember taking some Sociology classes and thinking that if it was a science at all it was necessarily an inexact one, as Moira's quote from Tey demonstrates.

      Delete
    6. Yes indeed, I agree with you - and much of Freud's work is not - how can I put it? - seen as correct now. Pinning all your beliefs to one idea can make life difficult when new evidence comes forward. Mind you, that can happen at the far end of, say, Physics, which seems like a set science but is far from that.

      Delete
    7. Lie detectors: in Fellow Travelers, a very compelling novel by Thomas Mallon, set in Washington DC in the 1950s, there is a descritpion of someone faking a lie detector test, and I was fascinated by that and wondered if the author tried one out...

      Delete
    8. Freud was regarded as wrong in his time - he wasn't a psychologist, but a neurologist, turned psychiatrist and the inventor of psycho-analysis (like Dame Eleanor Bradley, but less scientific). W.H.R. Rivers (featured in Pat Barker's Hole-in-the-Door trilogy) was influenced by Freud and produced a much saner and less reductive talking-cure.

      -Roger

      Delete
    9. There's a fairly convincing feminist take that he didn't believe what women told him, 'couldn't possibly be true', so had to make up theories to explain why they would say those things. Reductionist perhaps but certainly has elements of truth.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. Re "the far end" of science, I'm reminded of a t-shirt I saw online which said that Schroedinger's cat escaped from that box by way of Quantum Tunneling, and was out to get Schroedinger....

      Delete
  8. As a result of (among other things) the horrifying immorality of the Tuskegee experiments, in 1978 the US implemented what are known as the Belmont protocols or guidelines for all human subject research. It has three main principles - respect for persons (informed consent and bodily autonomy), beneficence (do no harm/risks must balance benefits) and justice (no targeting of vulnerable populations, studies should be inclusive). I was peripherally involved with two separate research projects when I worked in public health and there was a five page form we had to complete before we could even begin, explaining how we were going to honor those guidelines.

    https://irb.wisc.edu/regulatory-information/belmont-report/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, that's very helpful and informative - and I'me very glad to hear there are such protocols in place. But in the end it is always going to be difficult to prove anything because (again, simplistic) you can't in many cases have the whole have proper control groups.

      Delete
  9. Fascinating! The expensive clothes, and particularly the fur coat, remind me of Ida Cook and her sister smuggling valuables out of Germany on behalf of refugees. I know you’ve featured Cook here! As British women she and her associates were under much less suspicion, but she’s brilliant on making very expensive clothes and jewellery look like everyday wear - taking out German labels and sewing in British ones, wearing things casually. She pinned a whopping diamond brooch to her Marks and Spencer’s jumper and hoped everyone would assume it was paste. And when a friend was asked about her pearl necklace, she drew herself up and said, angrily, “Do I look like the sort of person who can’t afford pearls?” The official was so embarrassed that nothing more was said. But much harder to do if you were the one fleeing the country. As Sovay and Dame Eleanor discuss, hardwearing expensive things might not have been available, or too conspicuous. I think there’s also the implication, in the quote, that squandering was itself an act of defiance. Not practical, but a way to kick back in an awful situation.
    Zoe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The excerpt made me think of Ida Cook too! A different version of the refugee story. That was so extraordinary, the help the sisters' gave to people.

      Delete

Post a Comment