Black Wings has My Angel by Lewis Elliott Chaze
published 1953
Black Wings has my Angel is an
extraordinary piece of noir – the astonishing thing to me is that it is not more
famous, and that there has been only one, under-the-radar, film made.
And, y'know, human life comes in many forms.
When I posted on John
Franklin Bardin earlier this year, my cousin (Hi Nick!) recommended
this one as being in a similar vein. I was intrigued by the title – it is parsed,
I think, as ‘My angel has black wings’ though to me it could equally be a
character: [The person] BlackWings has [taken] my angel.
First person narrator Tim Sunblade (not, we discover, his
real name) has just finished a session working on an oil rig in Louisiana, is staying
in a cheap motel and orders up a prostitute via the bellhop. Virginia is a
piece of work in every sense of the phrase:
Her eyes were lavender-gray
and her hair was light creamy gold and springy-looking, hugging her head in
curves rather than absolute curls. She wore a navy-blue beret of the kind you
associate with European movies. Then there was the hair and face and a long
loose stretch of metal-colored raincoat, very wet, and the cold smell of it
plain in the mustiness. Then there were the legs and the bellhop wasn’t kidding
about them. Then there were the feet, broad and fat and short as a baby’s. The
shoes looked expensive, brown suede and shiningly wet.
(I was fascinated by her fat stumpy feet)
She has been hired for the night, but he has money and the
two of them fall into a kind of relationship which neither of them tries to
define. (Pretty Woman it isn’t). They travel around, try to leave each
other, try to cheat each other, have wild sex the whole time.
We discover more of both their not very edifying backlives.
Tim has been in jail, and has a plan for a heist, passed onto him by a fellow
prisoner. This involved the most unlikely use of a motorhome/camper van that
you could imagine. It also involves their living a suburban life together in a
small town, while they work up to their big plan.
…when Virginia watered the
lawn in a pair of faded denim shorts and the cocoa-colored T shirt made of
toweling, they came out on their front porches in droves...
You know from early on that this probably isn’t going to go
well. But the story has plenty of twists and turns, and dramatic settings – it really
would make a great film.
There’s a girdle featuring prominently in the plot –
Virginia has a perfect figure and doesn’t need one (though that’s not how it
worked in those days, a girdle was yet one more shibboleth of respectability). But:
Then we went to a department store and I bought her a pink girdle that had wide panels in it and was several sizes too big for her. The panels were important…
… because they make a good hiding place. Later:
Trying to strip the thing off her was like trying to skin a baby python with a sledge hammer for a head.
They end up camping out, and fair play to her, Virginia can
cope with most things:
If I took my time maybe Virginia would cook breakfast, although she looked less like a cooker of breakfast than anyone I ever knew.
…but she has.
Neither of them trusts the other, and they are quite right not to, though it obviously also makes the attraction stronger. Tim gets jealous seeing her with another man:
He was running his hand up and down her back as they talked. She wore a dress and cut down to the small of her back. So there was plenty of space for him to cover. When he tired of one spot he moved on to another, his hand busy as a tarantula in a fly cage. I can’t describe the way it made me feel.
Always ready with an appealing image…
Chase is very good at describing clothes, and very good at keeping
you turning the pages. It is a compelling book, as sad and dark as it could be.
I loved it.
*** In Jane and Prudence, there is an abortive trip to the cinema with a young man. They imagine the French film they might have seen:
"a girl in a mackintosh and a beret is standing in a doorway… a little later on there is the room with the iron bedstead and the girl in her petticoat..."
A most exact description of scenes in this book. and Chase mentions European films too. Both books published in 1953 - how nice to think that Chase and Pym were watching the same films at opposite ends of the world, literally and metaphorically.
Girdle picture 1953
advert
Screengrab of Dorothy Patrick in Follow me Quietly, 1949
Love this, Moira! What a great title. Great pictures too. And the description of the French film in Jane and Prudence had stuck in my memory - there will also probably be a scene in a nightclub with a soulful singer and people will be lighting cigarettes for each other. Chrissie
ReplyDeleteAlso a scene at a railway station with the characters dimly visible through clouds of steam.
DeleteSovay
And on the quayside with the fog rolling in and ship noises in the background...
DeleteOh, this does sound like a really effective noir novel, Moira - quite atmospheric. And yes, it's quite clear, just from the bits you've shared, that things will go very, very wrong for these two (but isn't that what happens in noir?i>?). It's funny this isn't better known. I often wonder why it is that some authors become well-known, and others, equally skilled, fade away...
ReplyDeleteI know, it's a mystery in itself isn't it Margot? But we can hope books will come round again...
DeleteOne of the first noirs I ever read, years ago. You can check it out at the Internet Archive (not a free download, alas).
ReplyDeletehttps://archive.org/details/blackwingshasmya0000chaz?
Do you remember how you heard of it? I'm going to look him up and see what else he did.
DeleteI’m not sure I’ve ever read anything that could be be described as noir! Maybe I should. This does sound very enticing.
ReplyDeleteYep it is me.
DeleteEVeryone should try one - though they may not be to your taste. They can be quite unnerving.
DeleteI stay away from noir, but I noticed on IMDB that a film was planned many years ago and never got off the ground. What surprised me was that Tim was to be played by Tom Hiddleston and Eddie by Elijah Wood, and neither of those actors bring "sleazy" to my mind. Not that I doubt their acting ability! Anna Paquin was to play Virginia, and I can sort of see her in that role, but I still wondered about the casting.
ReplyDeleteSometimes noir-ish films take on a more polished look, I guess they don't have to be sleazy. All good actors...
DeleteYes, some noir films can be very polished, even beautiful in their way, judging by the few I've seen. I suppose I was guilty of judging the actors by their images. I'm remembering now a film in which Tyrone Power, not a sleazy-looking man at all, played a very unsavory character. I don't remember the film's name, but I know you had a post on the book it was based on.
DeleteHmm, now you've got me wondering! He was in Witness for the Prosecution, but I don't expect you mean that. He was in NIghtmare Alley, which was his attempt to change his reputation from clean-cut to darker - but I dont think I've done that, even though I have seen two different films of it. And I did once mention the fact that CS Lewis married the ex-wife of the author of the book Nightmare Alley!
Delete
DeleteI could have mixed it up with another blog. "Nightmare Alley" was the film I remembered, and there was a recent remake so lots of blogs might have discussed it. I do recall some comments about a costume on one of the carnival women, which is probably why I thought of you!
I actually thought I had written about it, but can find no trace! Perhaps we have a shared hallucination....😀😀😀
DeleteNot one for my list - noir’s not my cup of tea. Also, Tim to me will always be a name for either a small child or a diffident but charming ex-public schoolboy, not a hard-bitten wisecracking American ex-con.
ReplyDeleteWhen did shapewear (or lack of ) cease to be an indicator of respectability? These was still lots of it around at the end of the 1960s, in all shapes and sizes, but the magazine adverts focus entirely on the practicalities - no hint that if you resist buying a panty-girdle you are the Scarlet Woman, but then I suppose they probably wouldn’t spell it out.
Sovay
So what happens to all those child-like Tims, are they not allowed to grow up? 😀😀😀
DeleteA good question about shapewear... and yes adverts tell an interesting story
Women who curved in and out in all the right places, and probably didn’t need corsets, looked OK in them. Those of is who needed a bit more help squashed ourselves into these uncomfortable garments, only to discover they simply pushed the fat elsewhere, and you ended up with wobbly bulges in places where none had existed before! There must have been some clever marketing going on to make women believe corsets and panty-girdles would not only make them look attractive, but you were were also some kind of moral reprobate if you didn’t wear one,
DeleteYes indeed. And of course the adverts and fashion shots were nearly all pictures of women who didn't need them at all.
DeleteI think there was some atavistic feeling that women must have many layers on, or they would face some unnamed danger or immorality. And then of course those layers had to be as uncomfortable as possible...
Gwen Raverat comments on ladies wearing stays of the 1890s: ‘ … their stays showed in a sharp ledge across the middles of their backs. And in spite of whalebone, they were apt to bulge below the waist in front, for poor dears, they were but human after all, and they had to expand somewhere.’ Some of the late 1960s foundation garments encased the wearer in powerful elastic from shoulder to knee - heaven knows where their bulgy bits went!
DeleteGwen Raverat also describes her family’s absolute determination that she must wear stays - if she takes them off, not only is there a big row but she is ‘forcibly re-corseted’, and ‘One of my governesses used to weep over my wickedness in this respect’. No explanation offered by GR other than ‘I had a bad figure’ but the issue of respectability must have been a major factor even if not spelled out to GR at the time.
The little Tims ARE allowed to grow up, but only into diffident but charming ex-public schoolboys!
Sovay
Gwen Raverat always such a useful source - as well as being a wonderful writer, I do love that book.
DeleteAh yes - wasn't there a charactet Tim -Dim -But- Nice on a comedy show many years ago?
Some great lines here
ReplyDelete…when Virginia watered the lawn in a pair of faded denim shorts and the cocoa-colored T shirt made of toweling, they came out on their front porches in droves...
Says a lot, eh? Reminds me of that day many years past when I was washing my car in the drive, and the neighbour guy just had to come over and start chatting with me about nothing. I'm no Virginia, but I guess the shorts and t-shirt and water were just so enticing.
You temptress you! Yes, there is something about the combination. When we lived in the US, I used to look in amazement at the High School students raising money for eg their sports teams by doing car-washing. I didnt really understand why it was such a money-maker until I saw the car wash in action....
DeleteGrand old American custom, the fund-raising car wash--still going strong! I think people also respond to the students who are willing to do some work in support of their team or group. (I can't believe it's fun, anyway.)
DeleteOn one occasion the local high school fundraisers had set up ouside a large supermarket on a main road near me. It seemed very quiet, I was sorry for them, so I left my car with them while I did my shopping. I couldnt understand why they were on the far side of the carpark, by the road, rather than near the store.
DeleteBy the time I came out, it was full commute time, and everything became clear: the girls were climbing all over my car in their bikinis, throwing water at each other, and men in cars were slowing down, doing uturns, screeching to a halt to return to get their cars washed by the young women. I know this sounds like something from a 1950s/60s unreconstructed movie, but I am merely reporting what I saw!
I too was puzzled by the US fundraising car wash thing until enlightened by the fairly unreconstructed 2000ish movie “Dodgeball”.
DeleteSovay
I haven't seen that film, but glad to have backup.
DeleteBut this brings me on to another US custom (or at least non-Brit). When my children came home from elementary school and said they were playing dodgeball, and described it to me, I thought they must have misunderstood. So these small children played a game where the aim was to hit each other with balls? What next - boxing?
they didn't complain particularly, but I knew that when I was a child I would have hated and feared this game with a mighty passion. It was bad enough playing games where it happened accidentally. But I would have feared being hit, and would also have not wanted to hit my friends. Call me faint-harted. Or am I missing the point in some way?
As a one-time dodgeball player (not by choice) I can back up your feelings about the game. I suppose for some kids it might feel more like a challenge of being able to "dodge" especially for boys who didn't mind rough-and-tumble stuff. The ball itself was fairly large and soft, and most kids didn't toss it very hard so it was rare that anyone was hurt, at least in my experience. Also in my experience, car-washing students didn't wear bikinis or even swimsuits, but maybe I just lived in a more conservative area!
Deletethanks for extra info, soft balls I suppose makes a difference. Though - another thing is that 'softball' as a game seemed a misnomer, it didn't seem very soft? I know it was in relation to big-time baseball but even so.
Deletethey definitely wore bikinis (a few in tight tshirts and tiny shorts) where I lived!