The Murder in Bethnal Square by Sydney Fowler
published 1938
I recently did a post on another of Sydney Fowler’s books, The Attic Murders, and while reading this one I at first thought it might not be worth a blogpost.
However, a major character is a pregnant young woman, and
it is surprisingly rare for me to get the chance to illustrate maternity
clothes, so here we go. The item above is designed to work both ways – so
belted at first (and after birth) then getting looser as the months roll by.
Elle magazine produced a wonderful slideshow of maternity
clothes which is my goto in these matters:
How Maternity Style Has Changed Over the Years
Bethnal Square, like
Attic, is quite the jumble – as one of the comments on the first one
said, ‘where’s the editor?’ Sydney Fowler, who wrote dozens of books, doesn’t
seem like someone who went over them much, or showed them to anyone else. He
certainly wouldn’t have survived long at a modern, structured creative writing
course… he’d be breaking too many rules.
A very dubious character, Henry Coldwater, has been found
dead in his office: he was a moneylender, a blackmailer, a receiver of stolen
goods. Many people had a motive to harm him. The story starts with a young
couple: she has been blackmailed, he is known to have attacked and threatened
Coldwater. Both saw him on the day of his death. But there is a list of other
people who came to visit him too, and the investigations go on in a rather
random way, featuring Inspector Combridge and the fussy solicitor Mr Jellipot.
The dead man’s clerk, Theophilus Flipp, seems to be up to no good.
Attention is focussed on a family in lodgings: Mrs Renshaw,
her son Bobby, and her stepdaughter Jessica. As in the previous book, people
have far too many names: all these three have different last names, not very
convincingly. Jessica is the daughter of
one of Mrs Renshaw’s dead husbands, by a previous marriage, so it is not clear
why she doesn’t share a name with anyone.
There was a fair amount of money going in and out of the office
on the day, and this leads to the most boring trail you have ever seen in a
Golden Age detective story.
“But when I took [the banknote], I thought he was keeping the balance – the five pounds. When I heard he was meaning to give Mother that to make up the rent, I made him take back one of the notes, and in the end he got it changed, and gave me seven pounds and kept three for himself.”…
This explanation did not give [the inspector] the vital information he sought.
No, really? There are pages and pages of this, as he visits
every character in the book to ask about the blooming banknotes, and I’m not
sure it’s very important in the end.
The young man is considered as a serious suspect, and the
inspector wonders if Bob’s moral code would let him commit murder. Let us take
a look at his workings, shall we?
The iron-hard division of right and wrong that allowed no latitude either to compromise or condone, the religion that drew much of its vitality from the older scriptures the Founder of Christianity had so sharply condemned, to what extremity might they not stir a mind that was young, emotional, rigid in its intellectual narrowness, and with its hatred of sinner and sin generously confused with sympathy for the companion of his childhood who had been betrayed in a shameful way?
And you thought Lord
Peter Wimsey was the intellectual and moral investigator. (Points for anyone who was not surprised
on arriving at a question mark at the end of the sentence)
There are moments almost of humour: ‘in recommending a girl
to purchase a business it is not usual to consider the risk of her seduction by
the estate-agent concerned.’
And it is readable enough, when not tied up in banknotes
and religious scruples. There are two unveilings of villainy – both more or
less just announced to the reader – not tremendously surprising, but the very
last page is very satisfying.
Much of the action revolves around a stationery shop, and I
found this splendid picture of one at the National
Library of Ireland.
Is it the woman who was betrayed in a shameful way that is pregnant?
ReplyDeleteYes indeed, I do not think it is a spoiler to say so...
DeleteOh, my, that sentence, Moira! And, yes, I was not surprised at the question mark. In ways, I can see the appeal of this novel, but that discussion of the banknotes.... well, that might put me off. To me, it's interesting how the book wanders around like that, if I can put it that way.
ReplyDeleteThere's a lot to pick at in this book, but also some nice moments, and it is relatively short! So I was glad I'd read it.
Delete