The O Douglas/Anna Buchan books were recommended to me by blogfriend Shay as comfort reads in difficult times, and I have been working my way through them…. today:
The Proper Place by O Douglas
published 1926
Mrs. Jackson chuckled. “What I say is I repay dressing. I’m not the kind that looks their best in deshabille. See me in the morning with a jumper and a skirt and easy slippers—I’m a fright. But when I get on a dress like this over a good pair of corsets, and a hat with ospreys, and my pearls, I’m not bad, am I?” Nicole assured her that the result left nothing to be desired.
Mrs Jackson is not in her Proper Place. She and her husband
– self-made, nouveau riche, in trade - are about to buy the home of the Rutherfurd
family in the Scottish border country, and move out of Glasgow to try out
country life. (The house is – helpfully or confusingly – called Rutherfurds)
The original family – mother Lady Jane, daughter Nicole and niece
Barbara - are sensitive, posh, highly-strung
and very poor, which is why they have to go.
A point in their favour is that although Nicole longs to hate the Jacksons, and never visit them, she cannot in the end resist the new owner’s good-heartedness. [ADDED LATER: I confused two kind ladies visiting Mrs Jackson originally - see comment below from Marty - now corrected]
Nicole hears from her friend Jean, who has gone to visit Mrs Jackson. This is what Jean says in her letter:
“I was shown into the drawing-room. Nothing could spoil that gracious room, and Mrs. Jackson, to do her justice, hasn’t tried. I told you I would hate her, but when she rose to greet me in a smart velvet gown complete with a hat covered with Paradise-plumes, and an ermine stole, I thought she was about the most pathetic thing I had ever seen. She gave me a very warm welcome and as I sat beside her on the sofa she confided in me that, except for the minister and his wife, I was her first caller. “ ‘I wish they’d come,’ she said wistfully, ‘for the cook bakes special things for tea every afternoon, and I dress myself, and when nobody comes I hardly know where to look.”
This is, obviously, because of the snobbishness of the
neighbourhood. the kind ladies will lead the way in making sure she ends up with
friends.
Nicole and her mother and her cousin are all
living quite elsewhere by now – they have got a quirky place on the sea called Harbour House in another town, so now O Douglas has two
sets of county people and poor folk to play with, and the usual web of
relationships, and wonderful servants, and the deserving poor, and children, all
turn up.
Some interesting details – ‘I repay dressing’, above is a
phrase that always intrigues me. As I have
said before, ‘Pay for dressing’ seems to mean something
like ‘looks good in nice clothes’ or ‘gets a good return on clothes in terms of
appearance’. Perhaps (gives) pay(back) for dressing. Lord Peter Wimsey’s
mother says about Harriet Vane that she ‘would pay for really inspired
dressing’ (and plainly doesn’t mean ‘she has a lot of money for good clothes’).
It is explained to Mrs Jackson
as potential purchaser that the house runs on ten indoor servants: butler, footman,
cook, kitchen-maid, under kitchen-maid, three housemaids, two more superior
maids. This is to look after three fit able-bodied women – why was there
never a proper revolution in the UK? Much is made of this 'poor' family's new house being ludicrously and hilariously small ie not needing quite so many servants.
There is the usual young
schoolboy whom everyone loves (a different such boy appears in most of the
books) and quite an unexpected fate for the kindly Nicole. Her cousin Barbara
is one of those characters where the author changes her mind about her vices
and virtues – both during the course of this book, and in a later book in the
series where she features again: She gets slowly more unpleasant.
Several times in the books the author uses a specific
phrase about a trip: ‘I had a cold weather in India’ which one assumes was a
normal phrase for the right season to go. Young women often went out in the
hope of finding husbands – they were known as the Fishing Fleet - but no
Douglas heroine is so crude. And in Taken
by the Hand, there is a useful list of what you would need
for a visit to India:
“Only a supply of washing frocks, and probably you have tennis things that will do admirably. Some tidy clothes for evenings—not too smart, an evening coat to sit about in on deck, a wrap-coat and tweeds for the beginning and end of our pilgrimage.”
See recent posts on evening coats of all kinds…
Washing frocks are not clothes to do the washing in, but ones that are informal and easily looked after - rinsed out and hung up. (By the maids, obv)
The first of Douglas’s book (1912) has the high concept
title ‘Olivia in India’ – it is (you would guess) a lightly
fictionalized version of the author’s own such trip, based on her letters, and
was I believe successful. I found it unreadably dull.
There are some nice clothes descriptions in The Proper
Place:
Barbara wore a dress the colour of Parma violets, Nicole
was in white, with a spray of scarlet berries tucked into the white fur which
trimmed it.
Mrs Jackson likes to make a splash, and talks of
champagne-coloured outfit and one made of gold tissue.
It is understandable why the books were so popular in their day, and they do work as tosh/comfort reads.
The top picture – a great favourite of mine – shows Bianca Todd, an American painter. The picture is part of the Smithsonian collection, and is on Wikimedia Commons. I originally used it to portray Molly Bloom in full flow in the very early days of the blog.
Parma violets dress NYPL.
Nicole in white with red berries – this is Worth so not very likely for the impoverished young woman.
Le fleur d'or - NYPL Digital Collections
Champagne/gold tissue also NYPL.
I have a couple of O Douglas’s books on the list with a view to picking them up if I see them, but may make more positive efforts to get hold of this one as it sounds right up my street! The Servant Problem is always interesting, and Mrs Jackson brings to mind Ermyntrude Carter, a favourite Georgette Heyer character from “No Wind of Blame” (mother of another favourite, the multi-faceted Vicky Fanshawe). Ermyntrude is an ex-chorus girl and definitely not “one of us” as far as the local gentry are concerned, but they do eventually come to appreciate her many good qualities. Your top picture could easily be her in her heyday.
ReplyDeleteSovay
They are very enjoyable in their way.
DeleteAnd yes, Vicky's mother! One for my collection of 'mothers who turn up at the time of the murder to entertain us'. I said about No Wind of Blame 'Highly recommended, but more for the cleverness and comedy than the detection.'
'in a smart velvet gown complete with a hat covered with Paradise-plumes, and an ermine stole, I thought she was about the most pathetic thing I had ever seen.' Nicole says. Is that the same occasion when Mrs Jackson says she repays dressing? Is Nicole just being polite? Is Mrs Jackson pathetic because she looks terrible, or because she looks lonely? I don't think it was usual for a hostess to wear a hat in her own house. Feathers and ermine also sound a bit over the top. Maybe she was pathetic because she was overdressed?
ReplyDeleteClare
Mrs Jackson is pathetic because she gets all dressed up and nobody comes to call: I think Nicole isn't worried about what she is actually wearing. I agree the hat and stole are not quite right, but that's not the issue. Poor Mrs J would be much happier in her old cosy friendly home in the Glasgow suburbs, but is doing her best in her new environment. And succeeds in the end - some people continue to mock her, but she doesn't care, and nearly everyone likes her.
DeleteIt's not the same occasion where she says she repays dressing: that time she is wearing a 'heavily embroidered coat-frock, and says solemnly, “What I’d be like if I didn’t corset myself I know not.”
I suspect that this lies outside the area of the Venn diagram where our interests overlap. I think I tried an O. Douglas once and it didn't take. 'Repaying dressing' ... do you think the contemporary equivalent is saying that someone scrubs up well?
ReplyDeleteThere is a discussion of dressing in Charlie Porter's Bring no clothes. He quotes a letter from Vanessa Bell to Duncan Grant saying " don't trouble to dress". Meaning don't dress for dinner. Virginia Woolf wrote to friends telling them not bring clothes, meaning the same thing, at about the same time as O Douglas' book. 'Dressing'seemed to be more about class and propriety than looking at one's best.
DeleteI think 'dressing' could mean exactly dressing for dinner - 'we shan't dress' is quite common in crime books after there has been a murder - going all informal in the wake of death!
DeleteBut it was also used in the basic modern sense, in terms of whatever clothes you put on.
That was Chrissie
ReplyDeleteIt seems to imply that before dressing or scrubbing up, a person wasn't much to look at? Makes me think of Eliza Doolittle.
DeleteNow I don't think either implies that they looked bad before! 'Scrubs up well' implies to me that someone normally dresses in a casual manner (but quite possibly smartly) and has dressed appropriately for a formal occasion.
Delete'Pays for dressing' suggests someone has found an unexpected style that suits them.
This cartoon has a little play on words for this saying: https://victorianweb.org/art/illustration/dumaurier/19.html
DeleteThanks Marty, that was very interesting and very much to the point. The commentary below was fascinating and quite shocking... I wouldn't have got the anti-Semitism at all without it.
DeleteThis sounds like, among other things, an interesting look at the class differences, Moira. Such fascinating perspectives, from the different characters. It may be tosh, but I like the way it seems to hint at deeper things.
ReplyDeleteYes, Margot - it's not high literature, but certianly has some interesting things to say, and some real emotion.
Delete"the house runs on ten indoor servants: butler, footman, cook, kitchen-maid, under kitchen-maid, three housemaids, two more superior maids. This is to look after three fit able-bodied women – why was there never a proper revolution in the UK? "
ReplyDeletePerhaps because with a servant/employer ratio like that the servants spent more time looking after one another than their employers?
Peter Dickinson, who met genuine servants "right at the end of the true country-house era", has an interesting essay on servants and their power over their employers: https://www.peterdickinson.com/murdermanor/
Graham Swift's Mothering Sunday, set after WWI and later, is partly about the collapse of the master/servant relationship - as is Saki's The Secret Sin of Septimus Brope.
I have read the Dickinson piece - possily reommended by you another time...?
DeleteThe relationships were obviously varied, and in flux, and big houses would create a community which suited some people. But I think it's a bit like people saying women didn't need to be given human rights 'because smart women can get what they want by being clever with men.' I'm not buying it, because I'm betting there were hundreds of servants who had terrible lives.
One of the tropes in fiction I've read is the old Nanny or Nurse whose word is law in a household. Cooks are also portrayed as domestic tyrants sometimes, like Anatole in the Wooster stories!
DeleteThere is a particularly good nanny in one of Peter Dickinson's books in fact - Nanny Durden in King and Joker.
DeleteAnd in Brideshead Revisited, the only person Sebastian really wants to see at the family home is his Nanny.
There were thousands of servants who had terrible lives, but for all that, human decency could creep through and make a difference.
DeleteIt's interesting to look at which servants, in books and reality, could rise above their servant status: butlers, housekeepers, cooks, nannies, personal maids, valets, gardeners... could turn relationships into personal ones.
There's a 1930s film, The Impassive Footman, where at the end the complicated plot turns out to be the machinations of the ignored title character.
Yes indeed. But unequal relationships, however personal, bring their problems. A servant can always be dismissed, whatever the friendship.
DeleteAround the 2000s I wrote a magazine piece about modern-day nannies, and employers who liked to think the nanny was a friend, and that they were very informal and nice to their nanny. And I wanted to hear the nannies' side of that. The article proved quite controversial - I thought of it when I read Such a Fun Age by Kiley Reid, years later: a very good novel.
The film sounds splendid...
Have these books ever been republished? I read a few on kindle and liked but did not love them. As I read your review, this one began to come back to me. I did enjoy the class issues.
ReplyDeleteI've read them on Kindle, and don't remember seeing any hard copies - perhaps Dean St Press will go for them some time.
DeleteMany of them are on fadedpage.com in various downloadable formats (free).
DeleteSome are in OpenLibrary too.
DeleteI use the Internet Archive as well. You have to fight your way past long dull-sounding books by and about an important lawman called William O Douglas!
DeleteOpenLibrary also lists her as Anna Buchan, much quicker to find!
DeleteAn excellent point, well worth noting!
DeleteIn Angela Thirkell's books she too seemed to change her mind about a character in midstream. The headmaster's daughter Rose comes across as extremely shallow and selfish at first, but in later books she has turned into a most kind and generous person. She does acquire a very masterful husband, but I can't see him doing a personality transplant on her.
ReplyDeleteIt's odd and disconcerting when that happens isn't it? I note that I said that Rose 'has changed character quite a lot since her appearance in Summer Half, but much to the good: she is still entertaining but more nuanced now'
DeleteI'm afraid I've needed her badly this week.
ReplyDeleteYes. 'No Kings' was encouraging.
DeleteWasn't that first visit to Mrs Jackson made by Jean Douglas? I think the quote was from her letter to Nicole afterward?
ReplyDeleteOh you might easily be right! I must have confused the two lovely ladies....
DeleteI have corrected it above - thank you
DeleteI'm currently reading the sequel and I have a fashion question for the experts here. A character wears "matrons' hats"--"high and trimmed, you've seen them advertised?--sitting right on the top of her head." I've googled the hats and found some possibilities but nothing definite. On this blog there's a "matrons' model hat" in a review of The Nutmeg Tree, but I don't know if it's the same thing. (I did see an ad that said these hats were good for people with small amounts of hair!)
ReplyDeleteYes, they turn up from time to time, and in fact in another O Douglas book - I'm guessing you are reading The Day of Small Things? In Taken by the Hand we have this: They were both a little more than middle-aged, stout, comfortable-looking women, obviously well-to-do, with Persian-lamb coats, expensive handbags, and hats of the type known as “matrons” set high on their heads. Also in a Patricia Wentworth book: 'a nice neat matron’s hat in one of those light felts', in Winifred Peck.
DeleteThe odd thing is that it is very hard to find a picture clearly stating that this is 'a matrons' hat'. (Searches always hindered, of course, by pics of Hattie Jacques in a nurse's bonnet in Carry On films).
I thought I did pretty well with the picture I found for Julia in the Nutmeg tree - it's my goto for a serious hat - but I would like to define it more! Coming up soon: an entry with a 1940s lady finding the right hat for a Conservative helper.