The Noonday Devil Ursula Curtiss
published 1953
…Sarah was wearing something the cool colour of lilacs… [she was] very cool and poised in the wide-skirted lilac dress.
Megan was dressed as though for a journey: pale lemon suit nearly the colour of her hair, an enormous leghorn hat, white gloves and bag…
Last time I covered an Ursula Curtiss book, I
introduced her in words that still might seem helpful
There were a number of
American women writing great domestic thrillers in the second half of the 20th century,
and it can be hard to keep them straight, particularly as many of them were
related to each other: Ursula Curtiss was a sister of Mary
McMullen, and the daughter of Helen Reilly. (Curtis Evans has a
great article on the family over at his blog The
Passing Tramp.)
That
was Letter of Intent, an absolute banger. I very much enjoyed
this one too.
It has a great setup – Andrew Sentry in a random bar in
Manhattan encounters a stranger who knew his brother Nick in a prisoner-of-war
camp in the Far East. And he reveals information about Nick’s death there: was
a fellow-prisoner, another American, implicated in this?
Andrew immediately goes into overdrive to investigate this,
and it becomes apparent that in their group of well-off friends with holiday
homes and NY apartments and parties, there is someone with something to hide.
The dead man Nick had a fiancée Sarah, whom Andrew has (he
thinks) reason to dislike. There are some missing letters and postcards from
the camp – might they contain a clue as to who was the acquaintance with a
motive? (It is very satisfactorily explained that anyone could take any name or
assumed past in the camp, so he can’t be tracked down that way).
Andrew investigates: he comes up with an event that
happened just before Nick shipped out. Could Nick have had information to solve
a crime…? Did the guilty party turn up in the camp and fear exposure?
By now everyone has moved up to the weekend cottages on the
Massachusetts coast, and events whirl by with a lot of searching of rooms,
people being knocked on the head, & memories being uncovered, before
eventually the guilty party is identified.
It is short and sharp (as I have mentioned before, she ‘could
teach some modern authors a thing or two about brevity’) and full of momentum,
with a clever construction. The only problem – and it is intrinsic in the plot
– is that the person in the camp can only be a man of a certain age who was in
the forces. She sets up nicely that there are a number of suitable suspects,
but you can’t really expect to be hugely surprised. The men are similar, verging
on indistinguishable, but she still does make the final villain quite awful,
although the reader’s chances of picking him out in advance are quite slim. The
book relies on keeping up the jeopardy and excitement, the creepy feeling that
the bad man has just left shortly before, if you only knew who he was, without much
in the way of clues.
But overall – thoroughly enjoyable, with a clever balance
between the prison camp, the privileged modern-day life, and a noirish
undercurrent.
Kate has also reviewed this book over on her Cross-Examining Crime blog.
Michael Gilbert’s Death in Captivity also
deals with dirty deeds in a POW camp – no blog entry, when I re-read it
recently I found the details of life fascinating, the plot less so.
The leghorn hat: this
phrase comes up in historical novels, much worn by Georgian and Victorian
women. When I was younger I vaguely assumed it was the style of hat, and had a
picture in my mind of one. But ‘leghorn’ (there are also, confusingly, leghorn
chickens) means a certain kind of plaited straw, originally from Italy –
leghorn is the anglicized form of the place-name Livorno – so just means a
straw hat. But of course over time it became associated with large hats for
rich women (male rural yokels might easily have a leghorn hat, but that’s not
what anyone is picturing). They were usually much-decorated, and fashions came
and went. (I went down the rabbit-hole on this one, reading about changes in
tariffs on their import in the early days of the 20th century).
There is a memorable description in Ford Madox Ford’s
The Good Soldier (the author is one of my favourites, and much
featured round here, though this book, probably his best-known,
has not appeared on the blog):
I seem to remember that, with
that dress, she wore an immensely broad Leghorn hat — like the
Chapeau de Paille of Rubens, only very white. The hat would be tied with a
lightly knotted scarf of the same stuff as her dress. She knew how to give
value to her blue eyes… For whose benefit did she do it?...I don’t know.
Anyhow, it can’t have been for me, for never, in all the years of her life,
never on any possible occasion, or in any other place, did she so smile to
me, mockingly, invitingly.
[Is this just me? Those sentences make me want to read the book immediately, and would always do so, whether I’d read it before or not. He is a magical writer]
Wide dress from clover
vintage.
Suit and hat, also clover
Small leghorn from NYPL ,
1910s.
Picture of a leghorn hat from LOC.
I do value brevity in writing, Moira, so it's good to know there's not a lot of 'padding' in this one. I like the setup for the story, too, and that writing style is appealing.
ReplyDeleteYes, she's a good writer for all the reasons you picked out Margot...
DeleteIt was only once I reached the bottom of this post and saw I was mentioned, that I realised I had already read this book! The plot did not strike a chord with my memory at all. It's funny which books stick in your brain and which don't.
ReplyDeleteThat's hilarious! But also quite famliiar. Yes - some books flit through the brain while some stick. And it's not always about how good they are.
DeleteI too assumed that leghorn was a shape - like leg of mutton sleeves! This does sound good. The problem of having a group of male suspects all rather similar reminds me of the difficulty I had in making the techie guys on an Antarctic research station distinct from one another. Hard to pull off and I am not sure that I quite managed it. Chrissie
Delete