After Delores by Sarah Schulman
published 1988
I always knew that I would one day blog on this book – and
if you’ve ever read it you’ll know why.
The iconic opening scene has the female narrator go to a gay club.
There on p1 we have this:
That’s when I saw Priscilla.
Some girl was dressed up as Priscilla Presley in a long black wig and miniskirt
wedding dress that said “I’m a slut but I’m really a virgin”, just the way
Elvis liked it. She was so hot in that dress I surprised myself, watching her
sashay around the hall handing out autographed pictures of The King and
swallowing Dexedrine.
[later] But by the time I got back, she was gone.
Only she’d left her little black purse sitting lonely there like me on a yellow
bucket seat. Inside it was her address book and a gun.
It's more than 30 years since I first read After Delores,
but it has lived on in my mind, and is to me a perfect piece of character
drawing – you know what this girl is like, and you want to know what’s going to
happen to her. To be fair, she is not the most important character in the book.
The narrator is racing round Manhattan like a pinball,
bouncing off bars, the diner where she works, apartment buildings: she is
devastated because her lover – Delores of the title – has left her for another
woman, and gets involved with another group of women: Marianne, Charlotte and
Beatriz. Someone gets killed. The no-name narrator is trying to find out what’s
happening. This book does not resemble a conventional thriller (which is how it
is described on the cover) or crime story, but she does keep learning things,
in between having bruising or loving encounters with a variety of people. Here’s
a couple of random quotes:
I mean, realizing that
your lover had a 16 year old mistress who has just been murdered is not the
necessarily the first conclusion one jumps to when there’s mysterious discord
at home.
And -
Charlotte’s answering machine
was sitting on the floor right next to Priscilla’s gun.. I threw a bunch of
towels over the machine and put the gun in the refrigerator just in case.
It is difficult to describe the book: more than 35 years old but it still feels fresh and innovative. If it was published today it would seem very new and original.
Reading up about Sarah Schulman now – which was difficult back when I first read After Delores – is fascinating: despite loving this book I had not kept up with her subsequent work and activities. there’s a lot about her on the internet, including an article about this book and an interview with Schulman by my friend June Thomas in Slate (the magazine where we both worked). I picked the book up to re-read after reading and posting on June’s own book – blogpost and author interview here on the blog.
Priscilla Presley outfits and pictures were easy to find online.
Since I discovered them in the early days of the blog, I have always cherished a set of pictures by photographer James Jowers (held in the George Eastman House collection) – amazing black and white images of New York. The two women’s photos were taken in Tompkins Park in 1967 (so yes, early, but…). The heart – one of my all-time favourite photos – was taken in Waverley Place.
Not sure this is for me just now, Moira. I think I'd have to be feeling exceptionally robust! I'm more into rereading Emma Lathen at the moment ... Chrissie
ReplyDeleteCan't complain about that, what a great series to revisit.
DeleteAfter Delores I think is perhaps for the robust, but it is very well-written and compelling. One day!
I'm re-reading Lathen too. Has anyone read her books under the name R B Dominic? They seem to be political in nature so I've been avoiding them.
DeleteLike you I love the Lathen books but never ventured into other areas of their writing. We need someone who has read them to advise us!
DeleteI have read all of them, though some time ago now, and enjoyed them. I will have a browse and see if there is one I can particularly recommend. Chrissie
DeleteI don’t think the R B Dominic are particularly political. Mostly mystery with funny bits about very friendly opponents. They talk about voting the way they must but usually just trying to do the best they can for their people. Very 1970s and civilized.
DeleteI think I thought they were 'about politics' rather than political, if I can make that distinction. But that does sound good... more books to add to the list!
DeleteAnd yes please Chrissie - tell us which one to read first!
DeleteIf they're all set in Washington DC I'll have to give them a pass. I feel rather ill when I think about that place now.
DeleteCertainly understand that....
DeleteThis definitely does sound like something unusual, Moira. And I'm sure that the New York of the book is portrayed in that sort of unusual way, too, seen through that narrator's eyes. If you're still thinking about it this many years later, it must have left quite an impression. I think, though, that like Chrissie, I'm not in the right place to read it right now...
ReplyDeleteYou both know your own minds, and quite right too! And I very much agree with you both that we need to find books that suit our current mood.
Delete"I threw a bunch of towels over the machine and put the gun in the refrigerator just in case." Personally, I prefer a gun safe - but this isn't a bad idea, in a pinch.
ReplyDeleteI don't think safety was always her highest priority... you should have a word with her.
DeleteWhat did the narrator put the gun in the refrigerator just in case of?
DeleteDidn't want to get rid of it, as she thought she might need it, but wanted it both out of sight and close to hand. Fridge! Perfect.
DeleteYears ago I read a very entertaining piece about life in the Deep South: a local resident who said she was forever reading accounts of dreadful family parties that ended in fights and shootings. Her big point was that the court or newspaper reports never read 'On hearing this, Mr Smith walked into a different room, collected the key, opened the gun cabinet in the family room, took it out....' Mr Smith always had the weapon much closer to hand....
I hadn't thought of that, but it makes sense. Not to mention the guns children somehow use to kill themselves or others....Maybe our notorious 2nd Amendment has a little-known clause stating that citizens have an inalienable right to keep their firearms close at hand and not inconveniently locked away somewhere. (And I'm not dissing responsible gun-owners--just the "Mr Smiths" of the world.)
DeleteIndeed. Playing Devil's Advocate - if you think your gun is important and might be needed, I suppose you would want it near you. We're not really up on these ideas in the UK!
Delete