The Eustace Diamonds by Anthony Trollope
published as a serial 1871-72
I very much like a Becky Sharp character, a young
woman who is definitely on the make without a care for morals and rules, and
there has been much discussion
on the blog. The
original Becky came to the world via William Thackeray’s Vanity Fair in
1847-48, though I’d love to hear claims for earlier versions. Daniel Defoe’s
Moll Flanders perhaps? – though Moll seemed much more someone who was subject
to outside forces: a really great Becky makes her own way in life.
Anthony Trollope’s Lizzie Eustace – 20+
years after Vanity Fair – is a wonderful character: completely out for
herself, absolutely no qualms or shame or nonsense about truth or honour. There
is something so very whole-hearted about her lack of principles.
In a small number of pages, Lizzie is married off to Lord
Eustace, and widowed very soon after. She has a son – the heir to the title –
and is comfortably off. But then there is the question of the Eustace diamonds
– a very beautiful and valuable necklace. Her husband gave them to her – but
did they remain part of the family property technically and legally, or are
they her own to do as she wants with?
the circle of stones with a Maltese cross appended to it…
Out of this simple question Trollope creates a fascinating winding
plot in The Eustace Diamonds, full of interest and jeopardy, more than 800 pages of it. The reader goes
back and forth on the legal question, though is never in any doubt that Lizzie
will hold onto them at all costs, telling any lie necessary, and embroiling her
friends in all kinds of difficult situations. There is also a significant crime
plot – I don’t want to say too much because I very much enjoyed not knowing
where the story was going.
There are – of course – other characters. Lizzie is a very
young and beautiful widow, so would like to re-marry. She wants to go to her
Scottish castle, and ‘she was accompanied by her eldest cousin, Ellinor
Greystock, a lady who was just ten years her senior. There could hardly be a
better woman than Ellinor Greystock,—or a more good-humoured, kindly being… the
two ladies went to Scotland together.’ This weirdly reminded me of Agatha
Christie’s Peril
at End House, where a cousin is living with the rich and
beautiful Nick Buckley. In this case, I think we see the effects of the book’s
being a serial: Ellinor is a very promising character, surely this Scottish
trip is important – but Ellinor hardly ever appears again, and this stay in the
castle (there will be others later) has no purpose except filling in time so Lizzie
can come back on the marriage market, two years after being widowed. (Widows,
black clothes and waiting were all
much-discussed on the blog last year).
Lizzie is an attractive prospect for some, and her dead
husband’s family would quite like her off their hands. She is very fond of her
cousin Frank, a penniless lawyer, choosing to ignore the fact that he is the
beloved of Lucy (a much better-behaved young lady). There is a dubious
pastor/preacher, a bad-tempered aunt, some very rackety friends, a young woman
who is being pushed into marriage with an awful man - she’s not much better
herself, but it is clear they should not be together.
All in all a splendid plot, and you never know what is
round the next corner: though the chapter titles are sometimes annoying:
eg ‘Lizzie triumphs’ as the title of a chapter where she is about to have an
important and worrying meeting (I am not spoilering the overall plot here).
I have mentioned
before that the big problem with Becky Sharp characters is – how
are they going to end up? Usually we have become very fond of them (as has the
author), we have invested in them, so they can’t get their just deserts, but
nor – on the whole – can they be allowed to win everything. Not in Victorian
times, and not really now, surprisingly.
It's a fine line – and Trollope does well here, especially
as I am guessing that we are going to hear more of Lizzie in the subsequent
Palliser novels. (Don't tell me, please, I want to be surprised.)
And of course a question arises, as it has in other
Trollope novels covered here, about the status of women, and the economics of their
lives. Last year one of the best discussions in the comments (and there have
been some bangers) came below a throwaway
post on The Small House at Allington, about a woman knowing she
looked good in a riding-habit. So I’m going to do another post on this book to
pursue that, coming soon...
Lizzie Eustace is tremendous fun – never a dull moment. I
always like a good medical diagnosis. Here she wants to avoid being a witness
in court:
Pulmonary debilitation was the
complaint from which she was suffering, which, with depressed vitality in all
the organs, and undue languor in all the bodily functions, would be enough to
bring her to a speedy end if she so much as thought of making a journey up to
London.
And she makes sure she looks nice in bed:
A fresh nightcap, and a clean
pocket-handkerchief with a bit of lace round it, and, perhaps, some pretty
covering to her shoulders if she were to be required to sit up in bed.
We can only recommend a Clothes in Books bedjacket.
There is a maid with the excellent name of Patience
Crabstick.
Unfortunately there are some very anti-Semitic stereotypes
regarding jewellers, money-lenders and indeed
criminals - very much of their time, but reading nastily to modern eyes.
There is a lot about the finances of having people to stay
in your Scottish castle, and the expenses and calculations of horses and
carriages, which I found very interesting, as usually not considered in
Victorian novels.
Lord Fawn – the dull dud featured in Phineas
Finn on the blog recently – has this enjoyable sideswipe aimed
at him: ‘Of course Lord Fawn, like a great child, would at once go and tell his
mother what that wicked governess had said to him.’
The final tribute: there’s a point where Lizzie is very
convincingly threatening to throw the diamonds into the sea to get rid of them,
and I found myself shouting “NOOO!!!” out loud.
Truly, an excellent book.
It is huge fun! I love that diagnosis: 'depressed vitality in all the organs and undue langour in all the bodily functions.' Who doesn't suffer from that sometimes? Chrissie
ReplyDeleteFun is absolutely the word. It honestly makes you think that Trollope has to have been a lovely man to write that. 'Undue langour' is a wonderful phrase. I can feel it coming on.
DeleteOh, this does sound like fun, Moira. And I always did like Becky Sharp's way of looking out for herself. Especially in those times, a woman had to do that, and it's interesting to see how that plays out in novels from (and about) the times.
ReplyDeleteYes, Margot, I think the position of women, and the way we think of that now, really has changed how we think about some Victorian novels, and their female characters.
DeleteWonderful post on one of my favourite Trollopes. I’ve always thought Lizzie Eustace stands comparison with Becky Sharp. If we are talking Bad Girls, what about Lady Audley, or Scarlet O’Hara? And what about Dulcie in Noel Strearfeild’s It Pays To Be Good?
ReplyDeleteThank you! And yes, great suggestions. I always felt Noel S must have had a very dislikeable Dulcie in her own life, because there is Dulcie in Wintle's Wonders also...
DeleteI haven't read the book yet, but if it is anything like the movie with Kate Beckinsale, Austen's Lady Susan is quite a character.
ReplyDeleteOh yes, Lady Susan is very much an earlier Becky Sharp, good catch. It's a pity Jane Austen moved on to 'nicer' heroines - though Mary Crawford in Mansfield Park is another woman on the make.
DeleteA favorite! It's been a while...but isn't Lizzie addicted to reading Byron? Even imagining one of her multiple suitors (mild spoiler: not Lord Fawn, oh definitely not the aptly named Lord Fawn) as her "Corsair?" It is never a good sign when Trollope's young ladies read Byron. I seem to remember an early scene in which Lizzie, surprised by a respectable visitor, hurriedly thrusts a volume of Byron behind the sofa cushions? Or maybe a French novel. Even worse. -- Your fan, Trollopian
ReplyDelete