The Fatal Gift by Alec Waugh
published 1974
Over-dressed
at the party? Your call. See below
This is a very strange book, and may have seemed even
stranger in the mid-70s. You might think of it as post-modern.
Alec Waugh is, yes, the brother of the more famous Evelyn. So
first, some history.
He attended a public (US readers: this means posh, private)
school – Sherborne - and was expelled for what we refer to on the blog as 'the usual thing’. He then wrote a lightly fictionalized novel about his schooldays,
The Loom of Youth. Readers and critics were deeply shocked, and it was
banned in some places (including his old school) and so naturally was a huge
success. The controversial content is almost unnoticeable to modern eyes. Alec says himself that much later one of his friends was reading it and said ‘I’m a
good way through, haven’t got to the hot stuff yet’. Waugh replied that he had
passed it 50 pages ago.
He was expelled from the Old Boys’ Association of his
school (what a fate!), but nowadays they have made peace. The old boys’ website
gives a very
helpful biography of Alec Waugh as well as a fair view of the
controversy, with this description of The Loom of Youth: ‘a candid
portrait of his four years at Sherborne School, complete with tales of boys
cheating in exams, talking slang, and having crushes on other boys’.
It is hard not to feel sorry for him, though not for any of
that, which set him up for life. But - he must have seen the way ahead very
clearly: successful writer, bestseller status, making his name with a stellar
career.
– and then his younger brother started producing his own
books, which were also highly praised, bestsellers. But Evelyn was on a
different level from Alec, seen as one of the greatest writers of his
generation. It wouldn’t be human not to be a bit put out…
(I will refer to each of them by their first names for
purposes of clarity, though Evelyn at least would have grumbled at this
informality)
Alec always was gracious and graceful, and said that Evelyn
was a wonderful writer. He carried on producing books – novels, travel books,
memoirs, having a lovely life as far as we can tell.
I have read a few of his books, and they are interesting
enough. You get a strong impression of him: a privileged entitled Englishman of
his time. Knew everyone, got about, didn’t seem to have money worries,
successful with women.
So now this late book – he was 76 when it was published –
which is hard to define. It purports to tell the story of Raymond Peronne, a
contemporary of Alec (though he is fictitious) but it features many real people
– including 1st person narration by Alec. The book follows both of
them from the 1920s through to the 1970s. work, war, affairs, marriages.
Raymond has a great pull to the island of Dominica, and buys a house there.
His father is a Lord – he is a second son, so is not due to
inherit. However the family line becomes very complicated. There is an odd
development where a woman called Eileen (who at first seems like a minor
character) has Raymond’s son – but also has a daughter by another man, who
ultimately
SLIGHT SPOILER
marries Raymond’s nephew, the heir, and has a child by him. Her relation to the various others takes some working out: will the next Lord be her son or her grandson, but in separate inheritance lines? (drawing myself a family tree didn’t help much) It is quite mad. As is the section where she goes to live in the ancestral home with a different husband, who has not recovered from the war. This leads to the most unlikely line in the book, where she says “I don’t suppose I will ever watch Coronation Street again”. The return from the war to the big house is very much in the line of Lissa Evans’ highly recommended recent novel, Small Bomb at Dimperley – rave review on the blog here.
Anyway – on Raymond goes: he is very good-looking, very
attractive, and doesn’t seem to need to do anything. I guess the Fatal Gift is
that he is tremendously, effortlessly, attractive to women – and in parallel, doesn’t
have to work to achieve anything else. So he never achieves anything. It’s a
strange story, one that only just holds the attention. And then plonked in the
middle of all this are a couple of very strong sex scenes (though ‘sex stories’
might be more accurate) and a sudden emergence of a supernatural theme. It is
most odd.
And part of me was thinking ‘what a good thing these men
and their privileges and money and thoughtlessness are – well, not disappeared,
but not so important these days…’
Alec’s own comments are occasionally more interesting. I
first read this book more than 30 years ago, but I still remembered this
fascinating insight into his writing:
“Berta [Ruck] is one of my
best friends. We help each other with our stories. She’ll tell me that her hero
plays Rugby football; she’ll send me her MS and say ‘in chapter five, half a
page about the football match in which he plays’.”
“How does she repay you?”
“I send a description of a
party. ‘I want my heroine to feel over-dressed; what would make her feel that
way in that kind of party?’”
Berta
Ruck
(1877-1978) has – of course – appeared on the blog as
one of my Queens of Tosh candidates. (For clarity: I am the Queen of writing
about Tosh). She wrote very popular books in her day – more than 90 of them - but is now almost forgotten.
There is also a discussion of why war is not helpful to a
novelist, which again stuck with me, and explained to me why I don’t like war
novels very much – for example the central section in Anthony
Powell’s A Dance to the Music of Time sequence.
His words of wisdom are too long to quote in full, but if
you are interested you might be able to read in this photograph:
(if it’s too small to read, and you are VERY interested, email
me and I will send you a bigger image)
The gentlemanly world of publishing is also considered
here - the Waugh boys’ father was a
publisher of some esteem. Different days.
Not much in the way of clothes, although I liked Raymond in
the late 1940s having ‘quite a number of new suits, ordered them during the
phoney war [ie 1939-40], but I’m not wearing them yet awhile’. This is because
it is not done to be too smart – people will suspect you of using the black
market. ‘You ought to give your coupons to a female’.
[men in suits, NYPL]
So for the top pictures I considered the question of being
over-dressed, which is not a concept I believe in much - and highly tangential to
the book of course. Black and white dress is a Barbier illustration. The second
picture, of a dance at a casino, is by the Spanish painter Carlos Saenz de Tejada
– maybe it’s more that the woman on the right is under-dressed? You be the
judge.
The mixture of memoir and novel I found quite annoying, but
didn’t dislike it as much as I thought I would. It reminded me of some of William
Boyd’s books, using the novel to look at the century as well as
tell a story.
The sections in the West Indies reminded me of another
Queen of Tosh, the mysterious Jane
Duncan – summary post here, with links to many other
entries.
Evelyn
Waugh is all over the blog. I wrote about Brideshead
Revisited for the Guardian, and I love his letters. (One
of my desert island books would be the collected letters between him and Nancy
Mitford).
Hmm...a mixture of memoir and novel. I'm not sure I'd go for that, because it would be so hard to do well. Still, I do give credit to an author for trying something a bit more challenging, even if it isn't entirely successful. And I can't help but feel a bit for Alec Waugh in the sense of coming to terms with his brother's talent. That can't have been easy!
ReplyDeleteI think there's a reason why there aren't many memoir/novel mashups - it is hard to do. the book is more of an oddity than a recommendation, but it was interesting to read. And yes, what a difficult role in life, the less important bro
DeleteI have the same problem with Uncle Vanya, and Howards End.
ReplyDeleteOK, I need more details - which particular problem?
DeleteWilliam Boyd has moved over to biographies/autobiographies of imaginary characters now.
ReplyDeleteThe memoir/novel crossover has quite a long history, in fact. Museum Pieces, by William Plomer (1952), is a good early one.
I think Evelyn (cowers from a metaphysical horsewhip!) was being autoiographical when he writes about vocations in Brideshead Revisited. He had a vocation as a writer and didn't want it, whereas Alec regarded writing as the family business and took it up the way someone born into a family of lawyers or doctors becomes a lawyer or doctor.
-Roger Allen
That's a very interesting perception - and would certainly seem to be reflected in Alec's writing, which is very competent and professional, but misses out on the spark of greatness.
DeleteI didn't get the "words of wisdom" at all. Why would a war have those effects on novel-writing?
ReplyDeleteI am sure that not all writers would be affected, but I can very much see that for some it would make difficulties - I think he explains it very well. As a reader, I find that when a book is set in the 1930s I know that the war is about to interrupt everything. Alec Waugh liked to write stories that encompassed long periods, and those books often head into the future: if there is a major war on it is going to be difficult to work with that.
DeleteReading The Unbearable Bassington or The Good Soldier is very different when you remember that neither of the central characters will live very long anyway.
DeleteYes indeed. And - on a quite different level - light-hearted family books set in the 1930s: My Family and Other Animals, and Ballet shoes....
Delete"you cannot have an important character slip under a cab or have a brick fall on his head in the middle of a story. And that's what a war does ; it's the equivalent of a brick falling off a roof." Waugh said.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if Beerbohm's Savaranola Brown, who disagreed with Maupassant there, was inspired to fall under a bus by that remark!
The Last Tresilians, which I mentioned above, has a similar relationship to the Ruck/Waugh one at its core, and there's a short story by Michael Innes centring on the same theme - in this case the reference is to seventeenth century Dutch painters.
I think that question of what you can and cannot do with, or have happen to, your characters is a very interesting one, but your range of references may be too wide for me!
DeleteThat had escaped me about Last Tresilians, I don't remember much about it....
Should be Mark Lambert's Supper, not Tresilians!
DeleteOh good - I don't feel so bad about not getting the reference!
DeleteI think the war problem is very much there for a certain type of book - I followed your link to Jo Walton's blog about Brat Farrar, one of my favourite books, and can see it there most definitely in the skewed post-war setting: definitely post war, because the dentist had been bombed, but in which the war cannot have happened within the chronology of the characters' lives. I have tried every way I can to work this one out and nothing gets over the problem. And of course it isn't just that it was published in 1949, but that the society she describes is impossible to set very much later without looking ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteYes, she obviously took a certain decision, but it is mysterious. And in some ways a much stranger setting than a Science Fiction or futuristic book.
DeleteAnd time HAS passed - the change in the type of servants, and the elegiac description of how arrangements for the horse show changed.
Another mystery is that I dont think Tey herself came from that kind of background at all - how did she know so much about the long-term life of a horse-y family in an English village? It is the most English book imaginable, and she wasn't...
(Anyone reading these comments without knowing the book would be utterly mystified I think)
Berta Ruck is such a fabulous name! I had heard of her in a vague way but haven't read her.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it just? And I think it was her real name - Roberta Ruck.
DeleteOne of those authors who was extremely successful, but completely forgotten now.