Roy Vickers - two novellas from a lost crime writer

 The Sole Survivor and The Kynsard Affair by Roy Vickers

 published 1952




 

This was a surprise – I would say ‘a turn up for the books’ but it was more that a book turned up…

Roy Vickers is someone I associated solely with the Department  of Dead Ends stories, a collection of which has featured on the blog. Then I came across this book featuring a pair of novellas: The Sole Survivor and The Kynsard Affair (1952). So (finally) looking him up I found out he wrote dozens of novels and dozens of stories. But it seems to me that most people, if they’ve heard of him at all, know only the Department of Dead Ends.

I read this pair, which could hardly be more different from each other.

 


The Sole Survivor is about the aftermath of a shipwreck – the framing device is an investigation into what happened to the men who washed up on an island. Only one survived till help came, and most of the story is taken up with his written testimony.

Now, an action book featuring only men in a fraught situation is something I can very much resist, but bring in the desert island castaways and I can most definitely be reeled in. As I said once before (in a post about – who else? – Robinson Crusoe)  

George Orwell (well ahead of the modern listicle culture) says no-one can resist a list of artefacts with which a character is shipwrecked, and he’s right isn’t he? (I tried to look up the exact Orwell quote, but was confounded by the number of Google entries where people pick Orwell for a desert island book…)

But one of my regular blogfriends, Roger Allen, sent me on the right path in the comments - and when I was searching this time for Crusoe and Orwell, one of the hits was my own blogpost, so rather circular. But - I can now give the quote I meant

A list of the objects in a shipwrecked man's possession is probably the surest winner in fiction, surer even than a trial scene.

And The Sole Survivor has both!

Here is a partial list of what they had  (usual bad photography):



The story is tense and worrying, and rather creepy - and you don’t know what to think or what to believe.

The survivor is William Clovering, a history don of 35, and he is fussy, finicky, very class-conscious, and very judge-y about his fellow castaways. The men on the island are being murdered one by one. Perhaps there is an extra, unknown, person on the island? The Wild Man, they postulate. And there is always this:

‘Did you not at any time suspect yourself of homicidal mania?’ The answer is ‘Yes - for a very bad quarter of an hour’.

How did Clovering survive? I did not find the ending of this one satisfactory, but greatly enjoyed the journey.

Obviously it has shades of Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None, and the Hitchcock film Lifeboat, and a novel on similar lines from 2012, also called Lifeboat, by Charlotte Rogan. (It does not resemble at all those other desert island classics, Lord of the Flies and The Coral Island).


The Kynsard Affair




 

Couldn’t be more different, couldn’t be more urban and less castaway. In this short murder story, a woman’s naked body is found in a car in an alley next to a prison where a man has just been executed. Yes, strange.

The crux of the story is this: there is a barrister’s wife who is missing. She had a ‘friend’ who looked very like her, who lived a rather rackety bohemian life. For most of he book it is highly unclear whether there are two women involved here, or a double life for the first one mentioned. It is quite clever how long Vickers keeps this going… it seems very obvious, and then you have to change your mind, and maybe change it again. The whole novella is built round this uncertainty, clues going back and forth, and a lot of detail of what time X saw Y and exactly where. The final solution contained, I thought, one very clever aspect, and one very throwaway one, as well as some strange relationships amongst various pairs.

One of the women  in the book was featured in an advert for lingerie, doing some modelling, ‘An attractive young woman in Titania underwear’ and there was much emphasis on this for no good reason except possible lasciviousness. One of the men involved was determined that the underwear was merely stage clothes. But Vickers proceeds to hammer it home:‘Cami-knicks! Panties! Stepins!’ is an actual quote from the book. Admittedly the blog has an interest in stepins, but this seemed on a different, and quite unnecessary, level. It adds nothing to the story - but there weren't any other clothes to speak of, so that's the illo. 

I think Vickers might have been able to create quite interesting, rounded people, but we didn’t get the chance to appreciate that because everything was subsidiary to the plot points. I wondered also if both of these books had been written to order, to a certain fixed length, because both ended very abruptly, and quite unsatisfactorily, and leaving a few loose ends.

But he was good at creating an atmosphere, and I thought this was a great picture of London at the time, very convincing. (It was probably a very good picture of the desert island in the first book, but I wouldn’t really feel I could judge)

The Sole Survivor picture, from the State Library of Queensland, shows 'Group of men with a captured wild pig on the beach at Moreton Island, ca. 1920', but most certainly has a look of shipwrecked sailors. As I was searching for a photo to use I thought that it was hard to think of the story as taking place around the time of publication: it seemed like something from earlier.

NOTE ON THE BLOG COMMENTS:

There has been a new development in spam: maybe they are being AI-generated? Comments that aaalmost could be real, but have a giveaway link at the end. I am trying to deal with these as they come up, but please don't let that put you off from contributing - I can tell a real comment! And let me know if I seem to have missed one. (I don't want to go for pre-approval of the comments unless I have to, which means I have to pick these off after they are posted) 

Thanks for persevering - the level of discussion at the end of my posts is something I am very proud of.

 

 

Comments

  1. Hmm.... I'm not much of a one for the 'action book with just men' sort of story either, Moira, but it sounds as though that one has a solid sense of tension and an interesting bit of plot line. The other got my attention right away; what an interesting premise for a story! I'm one of the many who's not read Vickers, but these do sound interesting...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm always one for very urban crime - a London murder is ideal - but I must say that the shipwrecked crew did pull me in.

      Delete
  2. I haven't read this or any other Vickers, but shipwrecks and survivors of shipwrecks seem to be fairly common in Golden Age crime - I think Michael Innes and J. Jefferson Farjeon both used them, and others too, no doubt.
    The first Robinsoniad seems to have been The Isle of Pines by Henry Neville - https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/21410 - an interesting work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd not heard of the Neville, but has an intriguing plot summary on Wiki!
      Thanks again for help tracking down Orwell. It's a most enjoyable passage, with his remembering exactly the list from the Coral Island. He is talking about Charles Reade, an author that I think I am yet to grapple with... I feel that Cloister and the Hearth in the school library may have been picked up and ploughed through, but I remember nothing. (I don't think till looking this up that I had fully realized that there is a Dickens story called The Cricket and the Hearth, and that these two items are quite separate)

      Delete
    2. Nothing like flattery!
      I may have been unfair to Defoe (if not to Crusoe). Crusoe is a fictional character, so his opinions on slavery may not be Defoe's own. The way Crusoe enslaves his benefactors suggests something dubious about him, whether deliberate or not. Defoe's "autobiographies" were so persuasive that some were taken for real, and the real memoirs of various people were taken for fabrications by Defoe.

      Delete
    3. Such an interesting character, DD, I feel I don't know enough about him, but also feel there are too many books and topics out there waiting for me...

      Delete
  3. Innes wrote of shipwrecked people in Appleby on Ararat, but the island they landed on was most definitely not deserted. (I remember mentions of the sea being green, which reminded me of a discussion here about incorruptibility.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are really keeping track! Still haven't got to the bottom of sea-green incorruptible...
      I decided a few years ago not to read any more Innes (having read an awful lot in my time) but you have almost tempted me. Is Ararat a reference to Noah's Ark? - it seems very un-sea-like.

      Delete
  4. The novellas both sound as if they have their merits and I will keep an eye out for them. I feel just the same way about Innes - read lots and lots years ago and not tempted to reread. Chrissie xxx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was so taken aback to find the green Penguin! And I am puzzled as to why on the cover 'sole survivor' isn't capitalized....
      It's very freeing to realize you don't need to read more of an author, isn't it? In the days when it was hard to get hold of GA titles I suppose Innes met a need for me, but no longer.

      Delete
  5. I don't remember a lot about the plot of Ararat. It was one of Innes' adventure thrillers, set during WW2. (A torpedo caused the shipwreck.) The "desert island" part only lasted for the first few chapters, and then they found there was a hotel on the island, and a bunch of colorful characters planning trouble (for Appleby to outwit). Still very Innes-ish, which I don't mind but I prefer his "cozier" mysteries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like you, I preferred the cozier ones - but I found your mention of the hotel with interesting characters quite appealing!

      Delete
    2. Whatever you think of Innes, you can't deny he creates colorful characters (Appleby excepted)! And colorful situations, although sometimes farfetched as in Ararat. His learned allusions often go over my head, but I still enjoy reading (and yes, re-reading) him. I think it may be his sense of humor and whimsy, obviously a very personal reaction.

      Delete
    3. You make a convincing case! OK, tell me your favourite Innes...?

      Delete
    4. I have a soft spot for Lord Mullion's Secret (which is a Honeybath book, not one of Appleby's cases). It's not one of his best mysteries but it just appeals to me. Innes' mysteries seem to take place in a world all their own, removed from realty even when real-life problems come up!

      Delete
    5. I will look out for it as your recommendations are always so good...

      Delete
    6. My last - anonymous - post on Innes/Stewart got lost twice! I hope one is in your stack somewhere.
      Roger Allen

      Delete
    7. I think it is not lost, but posted to a different blogpost - I think it ended up on the Gladys Mitchell forum, can you check if that is the missing one...? there's nothing else in spam.

      Delete
    8. Yes that's it - how very careless of me.

      Delete
  6. Based on this and on your post about "Department of Dead Ends", I'm thinking I don't need to add any Roy Vickers to my ever-growing search list.

    Sovay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mmm - I couldn't truly say he was a must-read, but I did find some of the Dead Ends stories entertaining. But when there is so much more to read round and about....

      Delete
  7. In the right place!

    The most interesting Innes is Lament for a Maker, I think. It was the first Innes i read; I came across it soon after I'd read Dunbar's great poem, which biases me. It's an odd mixture of whimsy (Appleby and assorted bright young people from Hamlet Revenge! are there) and grim psychopathology, using The Moonstone's technique and it doesn't really hold together, which makes it more interesting.
    Innes/Stewart is a fascinating character (Philip Larkin was a great admirer). He could write learned academic works, thrillers and detective stories and novels and short stories at a rate of more than one a year and produced what is a candidate for the prize for the least revealing autobiography ever written, but he never seems to have used his full abilities or pushed himself. I think he could have been a great novelist, but he either wasn't interested or lacked the nerve to do his utmost. His conventional novels are homages/parodies of other writers. The first one, Mark Lambert's Supper, is close to being a Jamesian masterpiece (and has something in common with LAment), but his later models weren't as good and he never struck out on his own.
    - Roger Allen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I'll move my reply over here as well!
      You do make him sound interesting, and I will look out for Lament (which I may have read a long time ago), and also Mark Lambert.
      I read the Staircase in Surrey books - five of them? - when they first came out, and think I enjoyed them a lot, perhaps more than the Appleby books. And a couple of his straight novels. One about The Man Who Won the Pools, and one very annoying one about someone who muffed his Oxbridge entrance, or cheated, or swapped papers or something? (Angela Brazil did a girls' school story on a similar theme back in around 1916, which I remember much more about)
      I have just remembered that I did two posts on his The Last Tresilians way back in 2013.

      Delete
  8. I'm feeling an urge to write a bit of fan-fic involving the wreck of a cruise ship on a desert island; passengers include Miss Silver, Miss Marple, and Joan Murchison, as well as a variety of other women. All the men get killed early on in some brave but misguided attempts at self-rescue, and life is much more peaceful without them. Only someone gets suspicious about the circumstances in which her son died . . . Of course the ladies have some very practical items they rescued from their cabins!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment