Phineas Finn and the course of true love

Phineas Finn: The Irish Member by Anthony Trollope

serialized 1867-88, published as a book 1868

       


Then Violet Effingham entered the room, rolled up in pretty white furs, and silk cloaks, and lace shawls

(picture from NYPL – it is from some years later but seemed to give the right impression)           

 

 

More about this excellent Trollope book, which I read on a trip to Ireland. (Previous post here)

There are quite a few youngish (in their 20s) people in the book with their futures to be considered, and decided, by Trollope.

Lord Chiltern is an absolutely excellent character: he is so recognizable – someone who behaves badly and needs reforming. He is obstinate and hard to help but has an underlying charm and integrity, and a sense of humour which feels very modern.

A not-particularly-pleasant man called Mr Kennedy is attacked in the street by thieves – key character Phineas Finn saves his life as he is about to be garotted. Talking it over with Lord Chiltern:

"The fellow was in the act of doing it."

"And you stopped him?"

"Yes;—I got there just in time. Wasn't it lucky?"

"You ought to be garrotted yourself. I should have lent the man a hand had I been there."

Chiltern is probably in love with Violet – and this is how he speaks about her chaperone:

"That old grandmother of evil has come to town,—has she? Poor Violet! When we were young together we used to have such fun about that old woman."

Are he and Violet destined to get together? She has also taken the fancy of Phineas Finn himself. He is worried about another rival, Lord Fawn. Violet tells them about an important charity:

The Female Protestant Unmarried Women's Emigration Society.

In a three-way conversation, she says:

"But it is a perilous affair for me, as my aunt wants me to go out as a sort of leading Protestant unmarried female emigrant pioneer myself."

"You don't mean that," said Lord Fawn, with much anxiety.

"Of course you'll go," said Phineas. "I should, if I were you."

"I am in doubt," said Violet.

"It is such a grand prospect," said he. "Such an opening in life. So much excitement, you know; and such a useful career."

Lord Fawn is puzzled, he doesn’t understand the joke, and ‘Then Phineas began to hope that he need not be afraid of Lord Fawn.’




But Lord Chiltern is another matter – he and Violet were childhood friends,

“Do you remember my taking you away right through Saulsby Wood once on the old pony, and not bringing you back till tea-time, and Miss Blink going and telling my father?"

"Do I remember it? I think it was the happiest day in my life. His pockets were crammed full of gingerbread and Everton toffy, and we had three bottles of lemonade slung on to the pony's saddlebows. I thought it was a pity that we should ever come back."

I think that is a remarkable description in a couple of lines of a childhood day out – the reader can wholly imagine it.

Lord Chiltern and Phineas Finn’s rivalry brings them to a most surprising event – and I am most certainly not going to tell you who ends up married to whom.

It is a great book, with a lot to say about male-female relations – although I would repeat my advice from the previous post: skim through the politics and hunting. Stick to relationships.

Standing man, standing in for Lord Chiltern, from NYPL.

Comments

  1. I do love that description of the day out, Moira. And yes, it sounds as though the relationships and their development are a very well-done part of the novel. Sometimes it's those things that add the most suspense to a novel, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Margot - one of the reasons I love Trollope is that I feel he has a good heart (as shown in the childhood day out) and that he can be simultaneously very Victorian and very modern. What a man!

      Delete
  2. His humor can sometimes be a bit ponderous so it is fun when so evident. I will say that as a teen I started reading Trollope because of BBC miniseries I enjoyed. I remember one with Susan Hampshire, one of my favorite actresses, where the men had the most amazing mutton chop whiskers! However, when looking it up to see it was the Pallisers, I see one of her first gigs was as Katy Carr in the Katy series in the early 60s. Is this the reason the Katy books are so much better known in the UK than in their native country?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't see that TV series, but weirdly, going through piles of old stuff in my Mum's house, I came across a supplement to the TV guide of the day, a quite substantial magazine about the Pallisers series - with, of course, Susan Hampshire on the front cover. I glanced through it, and it immediately spoilered my next read in this series, which is annoying. So I have to put it aside till I've read more...
      I did not realize that SH played Katy Carr, how fascinating. I think I must have watched that series though I was quite young, but it was always the book for me.
      As we've discussed before I think, it's still a mystery why the UK took to it so much compared with US.

      Delete
    2. Trollope's writing about the Palliser marriage intrigued me. He could see both partners' sides, as well as their faults. A problem marriage but definitely not the disaster that was Lady Laura's. And I rather agree with Lord Children about Mr Kennedy! The man deserved to be locked up at least.

      Delete
    3. My tablet keeps "correcting" words for me...although Lord C was a bit like a big kid!

      Delete
    4. The Katy books were translated into Swedish quite early - at least the first three were - and I read them and loved them when quite young, probably twelve or so. Though thinking of them now I am more than a little bit disturbed by that worship of the dead or half-dead (or at least severely ill or disabled) young woman that is so ubiquitous in 19th- century culture. Cousin Helen first, then Katy herself - bedridden for a longish period. As is Pollyanna. Judy in "Seven Little Australians"? Too lively to be allowed to live, so we kill her. And Beth in "Little Women" of course. I could probably think of half a dozen more if I tried. I am more and more impressed and grateful that Anne Shirley gets away with it and stays whole and hearty all through the series.

      Delete
    5. And of course, the weirdest example of them all: Elizabeth Barrett. Who ceased being an invalid when she fell in love with Robert Browning, and basically scrambled down the drainpipe to his waiting carriage, went to Italy and had a satisfying love life. The fact that she (consciously or unconsciously) played the part up until then just shows what a satisfying act it could be.

      Delete
    6. If you were one of a large family of daughters, this was perhaps one way of achieving some kind of individuality (consciously or unconsciously). There's a sofa-dwelling invalid lady in Trollope's "Barchester Towers" though she doesn't stick to the patient, saintly stereotype - Signora Madeline Vesey Neroni, played in a BBC adaptation by Susan Hampshire who was Lady Glencora in the earlier Pallisers series.

      Sovay

      Delete
    7. Alice James (only sister of William & Henry and two other brothers, to make things worse!) is another classic "female invalid". The James family epitomise many nineteenth century American traits - two brothers fought (and were wounded physically and mentally) in the US civil war; Henry was excluded by a mysterious illness (some say piles) and William felt guilty for not enlisting.
      Robertson Davies's The Cunning Man has a long meditation by a doctor on possible physical causes of Victorian female invalidity.

      Delete
    8. So much helpful erudition in this conversation!
      Florence Nightingale had her startling achievements and then took to her sofa or bed for the rest of her life for no particular reason, I believe.
      Apparently I read The Cunning Man in 1996, but have no real memory of it. The description online doesnt help.

      Delete
    9. All excellent exampes. And I suppose there were also a lot of young women who did actually die eg of consumption, in real life as well as in Victorian novels. Dickens seems never to have got over his young sister-in-law's sudden death.
      It is possible to feel some sympathy for a woman who can't do any of the things she wants to do, so just retires from life.

      Delete
    10. And there's Lady Bertram in Mansfield Park who may just be lazy, but could be bored stiff! I wonder if some of the well-off "invalids" were suffering from depression in varying degrees, that could have affected them physically. (It's depressing just reading about their lives, sometimes.) And the hypochondria of rich and idle women is a familiar trope of detective fiction.

      Delete
    11. Yes indeed, Marty. And of course it is accepted now that many 'women's troubles' were never taken seriously or understood or believed back in the day - post natala depression and endometriosis for example.

      Delete
  3. One of the things that I think is so good about Trollope it that he never forgets that the question of marriage was so much more important to a woman than a man. He at least will have his work - political career especially in these novels - if the marriage didn't work out, whereas for the woman it would be an absolute shipwreck as it is with Lady Laura. Until the Married Women's Property Act in, I think, 1886, married women couldn't even own anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I LOVE that my posts on Trollope bring forward such fascinating discussions on marriage, law, morals.
      I very much liked Laurence Stone's (non-fiction, quite academic) books about families, marriage and the law, though there were some awful stories in them. Those books brought home to me the situations people could find themselves in. And yes, Trollope gets every nuance.

      Delete
    2. Yes, Laurence Stone's books are very readable. And yes some awful stories.

      Delete
    3. It is hard to believe how much views had to change to achieve basic rights

      Delete
    4. Per Wiki, the legal doctrine of coverture was what made married women (as Elizabeth Candy Stanton put it) "civilly dead.". They had no independent legal existence, but were absorbed into their husbands' persons in the eyes of the law.

      Delete
    5. It is startling, and hard to take in. Everything they had owned, everything they did and achieved, their own children - all assumed to be the man's.

      Delete
  4. Wait, what? The Female Protestant Unmarried Women's Emigration Society??
    I absolutely love it. I'm already conceiving of a woman whose life involves emigrating to Canada and finding Meaning to Her Life. (As many did, of course, without such an aid).

    And wow...It WAS a Real Thing. This needs some looking into.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonderful! Chrissie

      Delete
    2. Oh my goodness, who would have thought? We need to find out more. And how many great novels could arise from this?

      Delete
  5. Married Women's Property Act was 1882 (an early very limited Act in 1870. Chrissie - again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks, v helpful! I'd be interested to know what the situation was like in other countries at the time.

      Delete
    2. In the US, reforms started around the 1830's but were very piecemeal because the actions were taken by individual States. I've read that reforms happened faster in the western part of the country and in general was a result of practicalities rather than principles. Of course land, especially, over here was much more available than in the Old World and we didn't have quite the same weight of traditions. Not that the changes were universally accepted by any means!

      Delete
    3. I think Switzerland passed the equivalent of the Married Women's Property Act in the 1990ies, which is even more striking than how late they were with women voting. There is a book by Patricia Moyes which has a strand of the investigation that seemingly only exists to inform the reader about the state of the law in various European countries at the time.

      Delete
    4. Sweden passed the married women's property act in the 1920ies, after earlier partial reforms, but existing marriages kept the old rules giving the husband decision-making power.

      Delete
    5. Thank you for this information, Marty and Johan. Very interested in the way the Swedish system worked out: how odd to have two arrangements on the go at the same time. I wonder when the last one died out.

      Delete
    6. It was eventually abolished even for old marriages, in the 1950ies.

      Delete
  6. Philippa Gregory's Normal Women is a great (non-fiction) book on women's rights and the law in history. Especially how rights were
    were lost, or rather stolen, in the Medieval period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just saw an interview with her in which this book was mentioned and thought how interesting it sounded, so thanks for the further recommendation.

      Delete

Post a Comment