Long Island by Colm Toibin
published 2024
This is the sequel to his Brooklyn, a book that had
two posts on the blog:
Dress
Down Sunday: Brooklyn by Colm Toibin
Dress
Down Sunday: Sales and stockings
back in 2015. I was astonished, by the way, to see that Brooklyn
came out in 2009, I assumed it was much more recent than that. Toibin certainly
gave it some space before the followup…
The book gets going fast: Eilish has been married many
years to Tony, they have two children, and live on Long Island. It is one
traditional extended family: their house is in a cul-de-sac where the other
houses belong to his parents and siblings.
One day a man turns up to talk to Eilis. His wife has been
having an affair with Tony, she is pregnant, and the wronged husband intends to
dump the baby on their doorstep when it is born. This is p4: setup complete.
Eilis is furious, says she will never accept the baby. She
is even more furious when she realizes that the Italian family, while not
impressed with Tony’s behaviour, are shrugging their shoulders and ready to go
along with this. What is another baby? He or she will be part of their family.
There is a certain amount of to-ing and fro-ing with the
family, and finding out who knows what, including this splendid moment:
Later, as she worked in the
kitchen, Tony came and joined her. ‘Was my mother here today?’
‘Oh yes, she was,’ Eilis said.
‘It was lovely to see her.’
‘I think she was worried about
you.’
‘We had a nice talk.’
‘So there is no problem?’ The
idea that she was standing beside a drawer of knives gave Eilis pause for
thought.
Eilis decides to put some distance from the situation, and
go back to Ireland for the summer, using her mother’s 80th birthday
as an excuse – though Eilis tends not to need an excuse for anything she does. She
hasn’t been back in many years to Enniscorthy, the town in county Wexford where
she grew up.
It is never stated directly what the date is, but you would
guess early 1970s.
Fifty pages in and we are in Ireland, and meeting again
Nancy, Eilis’s great friend from years ago, and Jim, the man she almost stayed
in Ireland to be with. Back then, ‘They were not just four friends; they were
two couples’.
Unlike the first book, the POV changes, and gives us life
through Jim and Nancy’s eyes as well as Eilis. Jim and Nancy are what the Irish
call ‘doing a line’ – Nancy has been widowed, Jim never married. (This has
echoes of a similar plotline in recently-featured A
Summer Season by Elizabeth Taylor). They would seem to suit,
both of them are keen on the idea.
Well, you don’t have to be Miss Marple to see where this is
going. The plot lays itself out before you. Eilis is going to waltz in and
upset everyone’s lives, just as she did before, while leaving her other trail
of trouble in New York state.
The next few weeks play out with events (a wedding, the
birthday) and outings and activities. Eilis’s children, all-American kids, join
them for a bit of most enjoyable cultural comparison.
The events are very well-described, as is the gossip-y
nature of the town. Everything moves in a leisurely way to a climax. When will
Nancy realize what is going on? What will be the outcome, who will end up
where? Can Eilis forgive Tony and go home – and what about her poor children?
I will say that in the last tranche of pages the readers is
dying to find out, and it isn’t at all clear how it is going to pan out.
The ending could be seen as ambiguous, though in my mind it
was clear what would happen next. And I thought there was a bit of a cheat in a
way that Eilis’s life is going to made easier. I will say, this is a great choice
for a bookgroup, because everyone gets caught up in it, and people surprise
each other with their take on it: if they object to the ending, what they think
will happen. And – and this is the big one – where their sympathies lie. Lots
of surprises there, you might find.
It is a very good read. The area in Ireland where it is
mostly set is one I know well, as some of my own family came from there. Their
homeplace is even mentioned: ‘I stopped in The Ballagh,’ Eilis said, ‘and
bought something I might cook, a sort of breakfast.’ That certainly added to
the interest for me, but I think anyone can enjoy the picture of rural Ireland.
It is unlike the first book, which, as mentioned above, was
wholly in Eilis’s head, and also was extremely linear: one thing happened, and
then the next. There weren’t flashbacks and memories and re-arranging of
events. This book was the opposite: that annoying thing with a chapter ending
‘how did you know I was here?’ and then the next one giving the answer,
starting with his getting up that morning. (It may be just me, but I find this
intensely irritating, and in this case it is clear that Colm Toibin is perfectly
capable of doing it in my preferred way.)
I remember also his saying that he liked in Jane Austen the
way girls were planning and preparing for parties and balls. And he does an
excellent number on this (both books) – I like the way he takes his time to
discuss this, and of course Clothes in Books takes it seriously too.
And then at the event we might get this:
Nancy danced with Matt’s
father who directed her around the floor, she thought, like a man driving a
tractor.
-along with a lot of watching and taking note and seeing
how everyone gets home, and who with.
I also liked the description of a church service:
she noticed her mother making
a sign to Jack at the end of the pew. He stood up and the entire family walked
up the aisle to the altar, Eilis’s mother flanked by Rosella and Dominick. It
was not the waiting that mattered, Eilis saw, or the kneeling at the altar
rails to take the host. It was the turning and the walking back, the large
congregation all watching them – Mrs Lacey, her sons, her daughter, her
grandchildren all home for her eightieth birthday. Eilis realized that her
mother had planned this moment, knowing the right time to step out into the
aisle and how to walk back to her place as though no one was looking at her.
(Interestingly, there is a similar scene in a John
McGahern book I read recently, also set in Ireland. Post to come later.)
Eilis is an intriguing heroine: she is quite affectless and
passive, while staying stubborn and unmoving. You don’t warm to her at all,
while quite admiring her entrenched views, but also every now and then the reader says ‘no don’t do that’ to her. The very prickly relationship with her mother is well done
– based on misunderstandings and miscommunication, it is heart-breaking and
touching.
Clothes are an issue. Here Nancy is contemplating a dress worn
by Eilis:
The pale yellow colour was new
to her, but the strangest part of it was the waist, how the waist was held in
by a belt in the same cotton and the same colour.
Toibin pays attention, as mentioned above, but doesn’t
describe much, and I’m not wholly sure what these young women are wearing. I am
worried by Nancy not seeming familiar with the idea of what my mother (a great
fashion expert with deep Irish roots) was certainly calling a ‘self-belt’ long
before the time of the book, it seems unlikely it didn’t exist in Ireland? It
is true that clothes were (in those days) very different in different
countries, and would look slightly out of place, for better or worse, if
they’ve travelled. The days of The Gap were yet to come.
I have just picked some illos from 1970s fashion magazines…
With the previous book, I actually found the film better
than the book, and can now only see Saoirse Ronan as Eilis with her cool
passive face. We can hope there will be another film.
There is another book by this author on the blog:
- Set in
classical times and quite splendid.



Agree, it doesn't make sense that a simple dress with a self fabric belt would be so nonplussing. I mean, Donald Davies was a quite well-known Irish designer of the 60s and 70s who made an entire career out of very simple, chic wool and linen shirt dresses with self fabric belts.
ReplyDeleteI feel like this is a case of a writer who has no particular interest in clothes trying to write something about clothes, but instead accidentally revealing their own indifference. Anyone who actually noticed clothes would know that what he's describing sounds like a completely normal, everyday and ubiquitous garment. Of course, the flipside to this is when they make up something that sounds completely nonsensical and makes no logical sense, cos they've found a name of a fabric, the name of a designer label, and the name of a technique, but don't know that a tulle Fortuny eyelet dress makes zero sense at all to anyone familiar with any of those three.
DeleteYes, you put it very well, as I would expect. I die for the tulle Fortuny eyelet dress! And yes exactly. I often think 'Bless' about male writers doing their best....
DeleteIt sounds as if Nancy had bigger things to be nonplussed about than a dress....
DeleteYes, but it's part of her feeling inferior to Eilis, and I don't think she should be feelling that
DeleteDefinitely not just male writers. I'd say historical writers are pretty prone to this, whatever their gender - they see all these glorious dress descriptions and toss them around willy nilly without fully grasping what each term means.
DeleteOne of the most charming descriptions I remember is when James Herriot is writing about the first date he had with Helen, and he just says "She was wearing a blue dress—the kind, without shoulder straps, that seems to stay up by magic."
Honestly, if you're not au fait with women's clothes, that's exactly how you write it. No lies detected.
I just found the chapter online with that quote in, and I hadn't realised how Clothes in Booky it is
In fact, I do strongly recommend All Creatures Great and Small, just for that one chapter. The gusset! The borrowed antique shoes! The impertubable housekeeper almost face cracking but saving the day. And the sheer awkwardness of that first date...!
DeleteWell you've certainly sold that to me, I must find it. If I ever read it, it must have been 30 years ago, no memory at all. Thanks!
DeleteThe waiter at the hotel restaurant! "NOT staying!"
DeleteYou're all tempting me....
DeleteHerriot himself had compassion for animals, but the book is full of companion and working animals not all of whom are treated well. (One in particular is too well-loved, although quite the character, the infamous Tickie Poo.)
DeleteTricki Woo! A memorable character in the books and also the tv/film adaptations. Herriot also documents the rarity of women wearing trousers in pre-ww2 Yorkshire: "Helen was one of the pioneers of slacks in the Dales and she was wearing a bright purple pair this morning which would in modern parlance knock your eye out. The farmer’s wife was partly shocked, partly fascinated but she soon found that Helen was of the same stock as herself and within seconds the two women were chattering busily."
DeleteI love it when blog readers love and converse about books I don't know...
DeleteIn spite of my obviously bad memory for names I vividly remember an episode about a harsh and unpopular man who had a cat, and it still upsets me to think about it.
DeleteQuite soon the whole book will have featured in this thread, and I won't need to read it....
DeleteI didn't really like Brooklyn. I can see that he is a good writer and yet I don't warm to him. I feel you have read this so that I don't have to.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! I always think Colm Toibin's books have a cold heart at the centre. The strange thing is that his book about semi-mythical Ancient Greece did NOT seem to me to have that disadvantage. Unexpected.
DeleteYes, that is exactly it. Having said this, I am now going to have to find out what happens in the end! Sorry, should have said this is Chrissie.
ReplyDeleteI guessed! I think you would be interested in the ending as a writer, the way he chooses to do it. But if you can't bring yourself to read it I will tell you....
DeleteI liked this book and although Eilis was passive in places and not in others, I identified with her and admired her for not wanting to accept the husband's love child. I thought her in-laws were incredibly annoying, although it is human nature to support their relative rather than his wife, even after all those years of dutiful in-law behavior and his bad behavior. It was a great book group choice - we had read Brooklyn years before and hadn't really thought about it since, but it all came back to us.
ReplyDeleteI especially liked Eilis ordering the refrigerator for her mother and then didn't it sit there for weeks before the mother was willing to have it connected? Also, the description of the grease hanging in the air of Nancy's fish and chips show was quite vivid.
I assume there will be another book at some point as the ending did not seem conclusive. I can also see him writing a book about the children set later on and giving an indirect view of the fallout that way.
He is undoubtedly a very good writer.
DeletePerhaps there were cultural differences between an Italian family and how Eilis would expect an Irish family to react to the situation...?
Eilis meant well, but she was very high-handed with her (impossible!) mother.
I think the book smacks of being the middle of a trilogy, I am expecting another book with a geographical title, but what? Very little of this one actually happened in Long Island, but it was there in the backgroun I suppose...
Given that Frank (the youngest brother) is gay, and living in 1970s New York, I did wonder if that would feed into a third book.
DeleteYes, there's plenty that could happen, and that's a very likely strand...
DeleteBy coincidence, I've just started a book called When Brooklyn Was Queer, by Hugh Ryan (nonfiction).
DeleteSounds interesting! Tell us how you get on with it...
DeleteMaybe the Irish family would have come up with a fake pregnancy and then smuggled the love child into the house in a warming pan? Rather than talk about claiming him openly...
ReplyDelete.... Yes an Irish mother/mother-in-law would pretend to have had an unlikely late pregnancy to explain away the presence of a new baby. And there were plenty of young women going off 'to do a nursing course in England'. They knew how to do a cover up in Ireland!
DeleteI liked this book a lot, and found it very absorbing. Also love Brooklyn and the film. It really struck me that in the past, when Irish people went to live in America, they would probably never see their families again. My grandfather was from Dublin, and I have wondered if any of his relatives went to America.
ReplyDeleteA self-belt turns up in a Ruth Rendell novel, but I can't remember which one. A mid-period one, I think.
Yes, my own grandfather's sisters went to Boston, while he came to Liverpool. They never saw each other again, as they knew would be the case. It was very sad - the later generations did meet up, but the original siblings never got the chance to visit.
DeleteFor me, this was more enjoyable and interesting than Brooklyn. Eilis takes a harsh view( I nearly wrote a hard line but as readers of the book will know, a hard line is somewhat different)on the baby and her husband's family but eventually her fate is taken out of her hands. The end definitely promises another book. It made me re-read Toibin's excellent non fiction book Lady Gregory's toothbrush which dissects the fantasy of romantic Irish nationism and the terrible conditions and servitude the mass of Irish people suffered for many years after the famine.
ReplyDeleteI've not come across that book, it sounds interesting.
DeleteYes, the more I think about it the more it seems he will continue the story....
Trollope set some of his books in Ireland and although he was mainly concerned with the Anglo-Irish he sometimes did put in descriptions of the awful poverty that existed there. This discussion reminds me of the song "Isle of Hope, Isle of Tears" which I first heard sung by the Three Irish Tenors on a public TV program, about the 15-yo Irish girl who was the first "off the boat" at Ellis Island. What a huge step to take!
DeleteShe was the first at Ellis Island, that is, not the first Irish person to come here!
DeleteYes it's hard to imagine, those people heading for a new life, but with little idea what to expect. I often think of my own great-aunts... there were famliy stories passed down about their experiences, I must make sure my own children know.
Delete