The Unknown Ajax by Georgette Heyer

The Unknown Ajax by Georgette Heyer

published 1959

 


One of my favourites of Georgette Heyer’s Regency books is The Unknown Ajax, which has a strong crime plot as well as romance, an awful patriarch, and the arrival of a new heir. (Heyer’s best crime book, Envious Casca, in my view combines elements of Unknown Ajax and Hercule Poirot’s Christmas to great effect – my post on HPC having one of my favourite blogtitles

Xmas Murder - en route to the house-party of death)

This excellent story has a lost heir coming to a miserable country house on the Sussex/Kent border - it is rooted in a clear time, 1817, and place, near Rye. The horrible patriarch has been hoping to disinherit him but has failed, two other heirs have died in an accident (this is taken very lightly considering they are close relations of the main family) so he is being brought in to be trained up. He is the result of a terrible misalliance when the son of the house married a ‘weaver’s daughter’ in Yorkshire, and was then cut off by his family.

So Hugo turns up, seen as an outsider and usurper to a family ready to dislike and despise him. They all expect him to talk rough, to have no manners and generally show how low-class he is.

So to the surprise of no reader, he is not like that at all, but sees their assumptions and plays along with their expectations.



Naturally there is a young woman, Anthea, and it has been decided by her grandfather that she must marry her cousin the new heir.

She asks her mother ‘with careful restraint: ‘Does it ever occur to you, Mama, that my grandfather is a lunatic?’

‘Frequently!’ Mrs Darracott assured her…’That is – oh dear, what am I saying? Of course not.’

‘He’s a mediaeval bedlamite.’

So Anthea decides she must be very cold to the potential husband, even though she is secretly charmed by him. This is all done predictably but well: the family slowly learns he is not as he appears, and Hugo and Anthea have wonderful conversations as they get to know each other: a delight.



But in addition to all this there is a very strong plot about Anthea’s brother Richmond, the wild young man of the family who is being held at home by his over-protective mother and grandfather, and hasn’t had a proper education.

Hugo, the outsider, can see that he is headed for trouble: he suspects Richmond has taken up with the local smugglers. When he cautiously suggests this, he is told it is impossible. The family has no problem with smugglers, and drink brandy on which no tax has been paid, but would draw a distinction between that and helping them. But Richmond is young and over-protected: does he understand the difference?

***The smugglers got me thinking ot this plot element in other favourite books, so I am reserving some disussion for another post this week...



The action involves the Dower House as well as the big house (mmm, I do love a Dower House, always a sign of trouble, may have to collect instances of them, too) culminating in an absolutely fantastic scenario where the newcomer has to organize a family tableau - almost a pageant - to get the young man out of trouble. It is intensely visual and would make a wonderful screen drama. It also contains one of my favourite lines in all of Heyer, where the hideous old man says ‘WILL you make way for your betters, oaf?” to a Sergeant. I’d quite like to have seen him carted off to jail, but had to make do with adding this phrase to my own idiom. (In case not clear – I always have resisted the idea that anyone is better than anyone else. Unlike Georgette Heyer I believe. I use the phrase with irony)

The characters are all well-drawn and filled out  - I particularly liked the Lady Aurelia, ‘a Roman-nosed matron in a turban’, 




who at one point saves the day when she addresses her grown-up dandy son in these frankly unbelievable words:

‘You have no need to trouble yourself about anything, for Mama is here, and will make you better directly.’

And Claud is shown as being easily laughed at and foolishly vain – but he also sees and speaks truths that other people apparently can’t.



More on the ethics and economics of smuggling, and of the events in the book, in that future post...

The burnt orange walking dress (second picture)  was very popular when I used it in a Jane Austen post last year, so why not bring it out again – it is from a few years earlier than the setting of the book, but people then and now hung onto nice clothes….

A walking dress, or carriage costume - NYPL Digital Collections

Walking dress ; Drawing room dress - NYPL Digital Collections

Walking dresses - NYPL Digital Collections

Evening full dresses - NYPL Digital Collections

[The Glengarry habit, September 1817.] - NYPL Digital Collections

Lady in a turban, Paris museums

Comments

  1. I had to look twice at the second picture to make sure that wasn't a large snake coiled around the lady --highly improbable I know, but that's what I saw at first!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I haven't read Heyer in too long, Moira! I'd forgotten how good she could with with family drama and with that sly wit of hers. I think you have a brilliant idea for that still-to-come post, too, and I'm looking forward to your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Margot - I'm sure you know plenty of smuggling plots!

      Delete
  3. Ages since I’ve read this but a firm favourite. Thank you for another lovely post Moira. Quite right, it would make a lovely film. Wish the BBC would move on from Austenmania!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re-reading an old favourites can result in downgrading - but absolutely not in this case: I loved it as much as ever and know I will read it again

      Delete
  4. I don't think this was in my Heyer top five when I first read all her books as a teen but it has certainly moved into a top position, and I enjoy it more with every reread. I certainly envisioned the characters when I visited Rye several years ago. Lady Aurelia is indeed a great character and what about the quarrelsome valets?

    In Five Children and It, the children say Anthea rhymes with panther, which always puzzled me as this name is uncommon in the US. Is it pronounced ANN-thee-ah or ANTH-ee-ah?

    There are some classic smuggler stories - Frenchman's Creek, Jamaica Inn (which I prefer), Watch the Wall, My Darling (Hodge), and one I just read and liked called The Sea Child (Wilgus). The Maplin Bird features another willful young man like Richmond with a ship and no father to keep him in line. I recommend it if you haven't read it (you know how much I love Peyton, Moira!).

    Constance

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for suggestions, which I have added to my list.
      I don't think most people rhyme Anthea with panther! Wishful thinking for children? I remember their calling her Panty, most unfortunate, Panther would have been better.
      Any Antheas I know pronounce it ANN-the-ah

      Delete
    2. The scenes of the downstairs pecking order, and the rivalry between the valets are priceless.

      Delete
    3. Yes indeed, I loved the weird fact that one of the main valet's scrubby young nephew suddenly outranked him!

      Delete
  5. I haven’t read this Heyer, but after these recommendations I will do so at once. One of my favorite Heyer books is The Grand Sophy, in which there is a remark that I find very apt for this blog. Sophy is choosing an outfit when she is asked if she does not think that there are more important things than clothes. She replies, “Not, I hold, when one is dressing for dinner.”
    Nerys

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ajax was one of the last Heyers I read and I saved the best to last. I love it. The scene with Lady Aurelia's ancestors lining up behind her in spirit is sooooo good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, Elvira and Anthea threatening/fantasising to start up a dress shop is fun and the cardboard reticule shaped like an Etruscan urn definitely arouses discussion among Heyerites!

      Delete
    2. So many quotable bits. Yes love the dress shop idea. And I love that Lady Aurelia was so firm and stern, but sees the truth about Hugo instantly, and sweeps her way through the pageant. Somewhere she says 'of course I'm a mere woman, I wouldn't dream....'
      Wouldn't it have been wonderful to have a whole book about her.
      Oh and I loved the two brothers, whenever in trouble with their mother, having a tradition of always unstintingly and without hesitation putting the blame on the other.

      Delete
  7. Christine Harding8 April 2026 at 16:38

    What a lot of different dresses for different activities and occasions! Walking dresses, carriage costumes, drawing room dresses, full evening costume… Did they really change their garments so frequently during the course of a day? And what about all the laundering?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should think that people liked categorizing clothes, but you didn't have to have all of them, or change all the time. In fashion mags to this day they have stylings for all kinds of activities which may not be what the readers are up to...'just the thing for your summer picnic' or 'festival outfits' or 'walk in the park'. And as for the clothes fashion writers think you need for a holiday....

      Delete
  8. On my TBR list! Chrissie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Honestly, it is such fun and so clever - ideal convalescent reading

      Delete
  9. This off-topic, but the era is the same--has anyone seen The Other Bennett Girl?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been watching it: an idle way to pass the time, pleasant to watch though full of unlikely events, wholly unconvincing.
      I've read the book, from which my main takeaway was that it was TOO LONG. When Austen wrapped P&P up in short order, doesn't it feel cheeky to write a 600-page book on Mary?

      Delete
    2. I'd thought that at least it was an original idea to focus on Mary, instead of doing the-current-generation's-take on-Pride-and-Prejudice, but wondered if it would actually make a good story considering Mary's personality. And I think it's a bit cheeky to write a 600-page book on anything!

      Delete
    3. I suppose it appeals to people who can't get enough of JA's characters. Im not sure I'm in that group, I am happy with what JA provided.
      It is imaginative and has some good ideas, and she has thought of ways to make Mary more interesting, and give a slight twist to some other characters. But in the end - why? and why 600 pages?
      However, I will continue to sit through the half-hour epis, which are undemanding entertainment.

      Delete
    4. Maybe the author realized that Mary would probably end up as the one left "looking after" the parents--and putting up with their put-downs--and wanted to write a different ending for her. Alternate Austen, so to speak--like the books with Mary Crawford as a heroine? Mary would probably need a personality revision though, like Fanny in the Rozema MP! I'm sure you'll feel otherwise, but I've always felt a little sorry for Mary--she wanted to be accomplished and clever but wasn't equipped to be either, and instead was made a figure of fun. Sure she was priggish and pedantic, but that could be a reaction to the flightiness of her younger sisters!

      Delete
    5. Yes I think the author really wants to give her the happy ending. Mrs Bennet is an absolute horror in the book and series, no redeeming features.
      Mary seemed caught in a classic trap - Jane and Lizzy older than her, Lydia & Kitty younger, two partnerships and she rather lonely in the middle. So yes I do have sympathy for her! I was interested to see an article today claiming that lots of women are very much identifying with Mary in the series and cheering her on...

      Delete
  10. Hugo is one of my favourite Heyer heroes and the imbroglio ending one of her best. Would so love to see a Heyer novel filmed instead of a Bridgerton.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! I agree with all. I don't know how anyone could read the finale and not visualize it as a film.

      Delete
  11. Now that everyone's moved on to the smuggling/Patrick McGoohan post (148 and counting!) I'm going to share this meandering observation I wrote for my D E Stevenson website, about The Unknown Ajax and DES's Katherine Wentworth. Perhaps of interest only to those who (like me) who used to gobble up both in my dewy youth. (And I still reread DES ad infinitum.)
    https://www.dalyght.ca/DEStevenson/des-heyer.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, that was fascinating Susan. Did you get any response to that?
      And - weirdly enough - I've just written a comment on the other post (smugglers) in which I discuss Heyer's concern that another author was plagiarizing her!! My thought was that it was Barbara Cartland, but perhaps....

      Delete
  12. My mother, a retired English teacher, told me that the first paragraph of the unknown Ajax was some of the best writing she had ever read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had to rush up and have another look - and I wouldn't have remembered what it was. I'm glad Heyer got in some of her notorious weird words. Whopstraw...

      Delete

Post a Comment